Shahram Shoeibi

Dr. Shahram Shoeibi

Associate professor
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

22Years (2005-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2017 in Food Control
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HRHossein Rastegar
Hossein Rastegar
SSShahram Shoeibi
Shahram Shoeibi
HYHassan Yazdanpanah
Hassan Yazdanpanah
MAMaryam Amirahmadi
Maryam Amirahmadi
AKAmin Mousavi Khaneghah
Amin Mousavi Khaneghah
ASAnderson S. Sant’ana
Anderson S. Sant’ana

17 October 2017 in Journal of Environmental Health Science and Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RMRoya Mirzaei
Roya Mirzaei
MYMasud Yunesian
Masud Yunesian
SNSimin Nasseri
Simin Nasseri
MGMitra Gholami
Mitra Gholami
EJEsfandiyar Jalilzadeh
Esfandiyar Jalilzadeh
AMAlireza Mesdaghinia
Alireza Mesdaghinia
Antibiotic residues are being constantly identified in environmental waters at low concentration. Growing concern has been expressed over the adverse envir

3 July 2017 in Toxin Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MAMaryam Amirahmadi
Maryam Amirahmadi
SSShahram Shoeibi
Shahram Shoeibi
HRHossein Rastegar
Hossein Rastegar
MEMehdi Elmi
Mehdi Elmi
AKAmin Mousavi Khaneghah
Amin Mousavi Khaneghah
The present study was developed to simultaneously quantify different mycotoxins including zearalenone (ZEA), T2-toxin, aflatoxin B1 (AFB1), deoxynivalenol (DON), and ochratoxin A (OTA) in 30 and 10 corn flour samples collected from local gristmill corn in Ardabil province and local markets in Tehran, respectively. A modified method QuEChERS (quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged, and safe) in combination with an LC-MS/MS technique was used for sample preparation and measuring the levels of mycotoxins, respectively. Spiked calibration curves based on external and internal standards were used to overcome matrix effects and were reported as linear between 2 and 50 ng g−1 for aflatoxin B1, T-2 toxin, ochratoxin A; 50 and 1250 ng g−1 for zearalenone; and 75 and 1800 ng g−1 for deoxynivalenol. With the aid of spike calibration curves and acidic condition, the absorption of OTA by primary, secondary amine was reduced, and consequently, the percentage of recoveries was improved (in the range of 92.98–103.8). AFB1, OTA, and ZEA were detected and quantified in 23 (76.6%), 6 (20%), and 14 (46%) of 30 samples, with average contamination of 154.1 ng g−1, 25 ng g−1, and 358.7 ng g−1, respectively. The co-occurrence of AFB1 + ZEA and AFB1 + OTA + ZEA was noted in 20% and 23% of corn samples, respectively. The measured level of contamination for DON and T-2 toxin of corn flour samples did not exceed the maximum tolerated level. Moreover, the estimation of dietary intake of AFB1, OTA, ZER, DON, and T2-toxin were 5.8, 1.1, 32.1, 5.58, and 0.06 ng per kg body weight per day, respectively.

6 January 2015 in Food Additives & Contaminants: Part B
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SAShirin Andayesh
Shirin Andayesh
MHMohammad Rasoul Hadiani
Mohammad Rasoul Hadiani
ZMZahra Mousavi
Zahra Mousavi
SSShahram Shoeibi
Shahram Shoeibi
Fifty-four canned tuna fish samples corresponding to 10 widely used different brands were purchased from local markets in Tehran, Iran during 2012-2013 and analysed on heavy metals. Mercury was determined by a direct mercury analyser without any sample preparation. For analysis of other elements samples were digested using a microwave apparatus. Lead and cadmium were determined by graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry and arsenic via hydride vapour generation. All samples had arsenic and mercury contamination. Arsenic levels showed a range of 0.25-1.42 mg kg(-1), which might be due to lack of national and international limits for arsenic in canned tuna fish. Lead and cadmium were measured in a small number of samples with a mean of 0.053 ± 0.058 mg kg(-1) and 0.013 ± 0.015 mg kg(-1), respectively. Results obtained for these heavy metals in all samples were lower than the corresponding limits, whereas arsenic and mercury contents might raise some attention.

1 September 2017 in Biosensors and Bioelectronics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ZAZahra Aghili
Zahra Aghili
NNNavid Nasirizadeh
Navid Nasirizadeh
ADAdeleh Divsalar
Adeleh Divsalar
SSShahram Shoeibi
Shahram Shoeibi
PYParichehreh Yaghmaei
Parichehreh Yaghmaei

6 October 2014 in Food Additives & Contaminants: Part B
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MHMohammad Rasoul Hadiani
Mohammad Rasoul Hadiani
SDShirin Dezfooli-Manesh
Shirin Dezfooli-Manesh
SSShahram Shoeibi
Shahram Shoeibi
PZParisa Ziarati
Parisa Ziarati
AKAmin Mousavi Khaneghah
Amin Mousavi Khaneghah
A survey of Iranian waters, sampled from 2010 to 2013, is presented. A total of 128 water samples from 42 different brands of bottled mineral and drinking water were collected and analysed for contamination levels of lead (Pb), cadmium (Cd), copper (Cu), arsenic (As) and mercury (Hg). Determinations were performed using a graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrophotometer for Pb, Cd and Cu, a hydride vapour generation as well as an Arsenator digital kit (Wagtech WTD, Tyne and Wear, UK) for As and a direct mercury analyser for Hg. Arsenic concentration in six bottled gaseous mineral samples was higher than the related limit. Regardless of these, mean concentrations of Pb, Cd, Cu, As and Hg in all types of water samples were 4.50 ± 0.49, 1.08 ± 0.09, 16.11 ± 2.77, 5.80 ± 1.63 and 0.52 ± 0.03 µg L−1, respectively. Values obtained for analysed heavy metals in all samples were permissible according to the limits of national and international standards.