Eduardo de la Pena

Prof. Eduardo de la Pena

Department of Plants and Crops, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Coupure Links 653, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

22Years (2005-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
9 November 2005 in New Phytologist
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Eduardo de la PenaEduardo de la Pena
Eduardo de la Pena
SESusana Rodríguez Echeverría
Susana Rodríguez Echeverría
WPWim H. Van Der Putten
Wim H. Van Der Putten
Helena Maria De Oliveira FreitasHelena Maria De Oliveira Freitas
Helena Maria De Oliveira Freitas
MMMaurice Moens
Maurice Moens
• Root-feeding herbivores can affect plant performance and the composition of natural plant communities, but there is little information about the mechanisms that control root herbivores in natural systems. This study explores the interactions between the pioneer dune grass Ammophila arenaria, arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) and the root-feeding nematode Pratylenchus penetrans. • Our objectives were to determine whether AMF can suppress nematode infection and reproduction and to explore the mechanisms of nematode control by AMF. A sequential inoculation experiment and a split-root experiment were designed to analyse the importance of plant tolerance and resistance and of direct competition between AMF and P. penetrans for the root herbivore and the plant. • Root infection and multiplication of P. penetrans were significantly reduced by the native inoculum of AMF. Plant preinoculation with AMF further decreased nematode colonization and reproduction. Nematode suppression by AMF did not occur through a systemic plant response but through local mechanisms. • Our results suggest that AMF are crucial for the control of root-feeding nematodes in natural systems and illustrate that locally operating mechanisms are involved in this process.

5 May 2009 in Journal of Evolutionary Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DBD. Bonte
D. Bonte
Eduardo de la PenaEduardo de la Pena
Eduardo de la Pena
Body condition‐dependent dispersal strategies are common in nature. Although it is obvious that environmental constraints may induce a positive relationship between body condition and dispersal, it is not clear whether positive body conditional dispersal strategies may evolve as a strategy in metapopulations. We have developed an individual‐based simulation model to investigate how body condition–dispersal reaction norms evolve in metapopulations that are characterized by different levels of environmental stochasticity and dispersal mortality. In the model, body condition is related to fecundity and determined either by environmental conditions during juvenile development (adult dispersal) or by those experienced by the mother (natal dispersal). Evolutionarily stable reaction norms strongly depend on metapopulation conditions: positive body condition dependency of dispersal evolved in metapopulation conditions with low levels of dispersal mortality and high levels of environmental stochasticity. Negative body condition‐dependent dispersal evolved in metapopulations with high dispersal mortality and low environmental stochasticity. The latter strategy is responsible for higher dispersal rates under kin competition when dispersal decisions are based on body condition reached at the adult life stage. The evolution of both positive and negative body condition‐dependent dispersal strategies is consequently likely in metapopulations and depends on the prevalent environmental conditions.

6 October 2009 in Biological Invasions
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Sergio RoiloaSergio Roiloa
Sergio Roiloa
SRSusana Rodríguez-Echeverría
Susana Rodríguez-Echeverría
Eduardo de la PenaEduardo de la Pena
Eduardo de la Pena
Helena Maria De Oliveira FreitasHelena Maria De Oliveira Freitas
Helena Maria De Oliveira Freitas

16 April 2016 in Functional Ecology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Eduardo de la PenaEduardo de la Pena
Eduardo de la Pena
LBLander Baeten
Lander Baeten
HSHanne Steel
Hanne Steel
NVNicole Viaene
Nicole Viaene
NSNancy De Sutter
Nancy De Sutter
KVKris Verheyen
Kris Verheyen
Summary: Although biotic legacies of past agricultural practices are widespread and increasing in contemporary ecosystems, our understanding of the mechanisms driving such legacies is still poor. Forest understories on former agricultural land show low frequencies and abundance of typical woodland species when compared with ancient forests. These community shifts have been ascribed to the effects of dispersal limitation. A rarely considered mechanism is that post‐dispersal processes driven by plant‐associated communities determine the poor performance and recruitment of woodland indicators. Given the strong alterations in soil conditions due to former agricultural practices, we hypothesized that (abiotic) plant–soil feedbacks could be a major factor in community shifts. We addressed this hypothesis by comparing plant‐associated communities in the soil and above the ground in ancient and post‐agricultural alluvial forests; then, we experimentally tested whether the changes in biotic and abiotic soil properties could affect above‐ground herbivore abundance and pressure and plant performance. Ancient and post‐agricultural communities clearly differed in composition at different levels of the food web. Besides the plant community, we also observed the differences in the microbial and nematode community with increased abundance of root‐feeding nematodes in post‐agricultural soils. The composition of the above‐ground invertebrate community did not differ in ancient and post‐agricultural forest parcels; however, plants growing in post‐agricultural sites showed higher abundance of invertebrate herbivores and suffered more herbivory. Nutrient analyses of soil and plants showed that increased levels of phosphorus (and to a lesser extent, nitrogen) made plants more nutritious for insect herbivores. Laboratory experiments further pointed to this mechanism as an explanation of the poorer performance of woodland indicators in post‐agricultural woodlands. Our results point to biotic and abiotic plant–soil feedbacks coupled with herbivory as a new mechanism to explain the legacy effects in temperate forests. The modification of the below‐ground community and soil abiotic characteristics by previous agricultural activity affects not only the plant growth but also the plant nutrient content in the compared understorey species, making them more susceptible to above‐ground herbivory. Our results provide one of the first examples of integrating plant–soil feedback and above‐ and below‐ground interactions to explain land‐use legacies.

11 April 2010 in Biological Invasions
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Eduardo de la PenaEduardo de la Pena
Eduardo de la Pena
NCNikki de Clercq
Nikki de Clercq
DBDries Bonte
Dries Bonte
Sergio RoiloaSergio Roiloa
Sergio Roiloa
SRSusana Rodríguez-Echeverría
Susana Rodríguez-Echeverría
Helena Maria De Oliveira FreitasHelena Maria De Oliveira Freitas
Helena Maria De Oliveira Freitas

1 August 2008 in Forest Ecology and Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Eduardo de la PenaEduardo de la Pena
Eduardo de la Pena
MHMarisol Hidalgo
Marisol Hidalgo
BLBarbara Langdon
Barbara Langdon
APAnibal Pauchard
Anibal Pauchard