Jian Xiao

Dr. Jian Xiao

Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

13Years (2014-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2024 in Immune Network
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LWLijing Wang
Lijing Wang
QYQiao Yu
Qiao Yu
JXJian Xiao
Jian Xiao
QCQiong Chen
Qiong Chen
MFMin Fang
Min Fang
HZHongjun Zhao
Hongjun Zhao
Wang L, et al. Immune Netw. 2024 Jan;24(2):e3. https://doi.org/10.4110/in.2024.24.e3

1 June 2020 in Journal of Infection and Public Health
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JXJian Xiao
Jian Xiao
MFMin Fang
Min Fang
QCQiong Chen
Qiong Chen
BHBixiu He
Bixiu He
In the recent two decades, three global viral infectious diseases, severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), middle east respiratory syndrome (MERS), and coronavirus disease (COVID-19), have occurred worldwide. SARS occurred in November 2002, causing 8096 infected cases, as well as 774 deaths. MERS occurred in June, 2012, causing 2519 confirmed cases, along with 866 associated deaths. COVID-19 occurred in December 2019, as of 30 April 2020, a total of 3,024,059 clinical cases have been reported, including 208,112 deaths. Healthcare workers (HCWs) need to be in close contact with these virus-infected patients and their contaminated environments at work, thus leading to be infected in some of them, even a few of them are died in line of duty. In this review, we summarized the infection status of HCWs during the outbreak of SARS, MERS and COVID-19, with in-depth discussion, hoping to provoke sufficient attention to the HCWs infection status by more people.

1 September 2016 in OncoTargets and Therapy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JXJian Xiao
Jian Xiao
YZYong Zou
Yong Zou
XLXiaoxiao Lu
Xiaoxiao Lu
BXBin Xie
Bin Xie
QYQiao Yu
Qiao Yu
QCQiong Chen
Qiong Chen
Objective: Increasing evidence indicates that the decreased expression of microRNA-133a (miR-133a) may be correlated with poor survival for cancer patients. Thus, we performed this meta-analysis to evaluate the prognostic value of decreased miR-133a in solid cancers. Methods: Eligible studies were gathered by searching on PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase. Using the STATA 12.0 software, the pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for total and subgroup analyses were calculated to investigate the possible correlation between decreased miR-133a and overall survival (OS) of patients with cancer. Results: Ten studies were enrolled in this meta-analysis. The pooled result showed that decreased expression of miR-133a predicted poor OS in solid cancer patients (HR =1.62, 95% CI: 1.16–2.24, P=0.004). Compared with the total pooled HR, further analyses indicated that the subgroups of digestive system neoplasms (HR =1.73, 95% CI: 1.20–2.51, P=0.003), frozen tissue preservation (HR =1.89, 95% CI: 1.41–2.53, P<0.001), and multivariate analysis (HR =2.07, 95% CI: 1.42–3.02, P<0.001) exhibited stronger connection between decreased miR-133a expression and OS outcome. Conclusion: This meta-analysis suggested that decreased miR-133a was associated with poor OS in patients with solid cancer. Because of the data in our study are limited, additional studies are required to verify the poor prognosis of decreased miR-133a in solid tumors.

1 April 2016 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JXJian Xiao
Jian Xiao
YZYong Zou
Yong Zou
XCXi Chen
Xi Chen
YGYing Gao
Ying Gao
MXMingxuan Xie
Mingxuan Xie
QCQiong Chen
Qiong Chen
Liver kinase B1 (LKB1) is a protein kinase that regulates the growth, integrity and polarity of mammalian cells. Recent studies have reported the prognostic value of decreased LKB1 expression in different tumors. However, the results of these studies remain controversial. Therefore, this meta-analysis was performed to more accurately estimate the role of decreased LKB1 in the prognostication of human solid tumors. A systematic literature search in the electronic databases PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and CNKI (updated to October 15, 2015) was performed to identify eligible studies. The overall survival (OS), relapse-free survival (RFS), disease-free survival (DFS) and clinicopathological features data were collected from these studies. The hazard ratios (HRs), odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated and pooled with a random-effects models using Stata12.0 software. A total of 14 studies covering 1915 patients with solid tumors were included in this meta-analysis. Decreased LKB1 was associated with poorer OS in both the univariate (HR: 1.86, 95%CI: 1.42–2.42, P<0.001) and multivariate (HR: 1.55, 95%CI: 1.09–2.21, P = 0.015) analyses. A subgroup analysis revealed that the associations between decreased LKB1 and poor OS were significant within the Asian region (HR 2.18, 95%CI: 1.66–2.86, P<0.001) and obvious for lung cancer (HR: 2.16, 95%CI: 1.47–3.18, P<0.001). However, the articles that involved analyses of both RFS and DFS numbered only 3, and no statistically significant correlations of decreased LKB1 with RFS or DFS were observed in this study. Additionally, the pooled odds ratios (ORs) indicated that decreased LKB1 was associated with larger tumor size (OR: 1.60, 95%CI: 1.09–2.36, P = 0.017), lymph node metastasis (OR: 2.41, 95%CI: 1.53–3.78, P<0.001) and a higher TNM stage (OR: 3.35, 95%CI: 2.20–5.09, P<0.001). These results suggest that decreased LKB1 expression in patients with solid tumors might be related to poor prognosis and serve as a potential predictive marker of poor clinicopathological prognostic factors. Additional studies are required to verify the clinical utility of decreased LKB1 in solid tumors.

26 July 2016 in Scientific Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JXJian Xiao
Jian Xiao
BHBixiu He
Bixiu He
YZYong Zou
Yong Zou
XCXi Chen
Xi Chen
XLXiaoxiao Lu
Xiaoxiao Lu
QCQiong Chen
Qiong Chen
The prognostic value of forkhead box protein P1 (FOXP1) protein expression in tumors remains controversial. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis, searching the PubMed, Embase and Web of Science databases to identify eligible studies. In total, we analyzed 22 articles that examined 9 tumor types and included 2468 patients. Overall, decreased expression of FOXP1 protein was associated with favorable overall survival (OS) in lymphoma patients (HR = 0.38, 95%CI: 0.30–0.48, p < 0.001). In patients with solid tumors, decreased FOXP1 expression correlated with unfavorable OS (HR = 1.82, 95%CI: 1.18–2.83, p = 0.007). However, when FOXP1 protein expression was nuclear, decreased expression was also associated with favorable OS (HR = 0.53, 95%CI: 0.32–0.86, p = 0.011). Furthermore, decreased FOXP1 expression resulted in the best OS in patients with mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphomas (HR = 0.26, 95%CI: 0.11–0.59, p = 0.001), but the worst OS was observed in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients (HR = 3.11, 95%CI: 1.87–5.17, p < 0.001). In addition, decreased FOXP1 expression was significantly correlated with an unfavorable relapse-free survival (RFS) in breast cancer patients (HR = 1.93, 95%CI: 1.33–2.80, p = 0.001).

11 June 2020 in Thoracic Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JXJian Xiao
Jian Xiao
XCXi Chen
Xi Chen
XLXiaoxiao Lu
Xiaoxiao Lu
MXMingxuan Xie
Mingxuan Xie
BHBixiu He
Bixiu He
QCQiong Chen
Qiong Chen
Background: The aim of this study was to determine whether progesterone could inhibit the growth of lung adenocarcinoma cells via membrane progesterone receptor alpha (mPRα) and elucidate its potential mechanism. The relationship between mPRα expression and the survival prognosis of lung adenocarcinoma patients was studied.Methods: A mPRα knockdown lung adenocarcinoma cell line was constructed and treated with P4 and Org (a derivative of P4 and specific agonist of mPRα). Cell proliferation was assessed using CCK‐8 and plate colony formation assays. Protein expression was detected by western blotting. A nude mouse model of lung adenocarcinoma was established to assess the antitumor effect of P4/Org in vivo.Results: We initially determined that mPRα could promote the development of lung adenocarcinoma through the following lines of evidence. High expression of mPRα both at the mRNA and protein level was significantly associated with the poor prognosis of lung adenocarcinoma patients. The downregulation of mPRα inhibited the proliferation of lung adenocarcinoma cells. We further showed that mPRα mediates the ability of P4 to inhibit the growth of lung adenocarcinoma cells through the following lines of evidence: P4/Org inhibited the proliferation of lung adenocarcinoma cells; mPRα mediated the ability of P4/Org to inhibit lung adenocarcinoma cell proliferation; mPRα mediated the ability of P4/Org to inhibit the PKA (cAMP‐dependent protein kinase)/CREB (cAMP responsive element binding protein) and PKA/β‐catenin signaling pathways; and P4/Org inhibited the growth of a lung adenocarcinoma tumor model in vivo.Conclusions: In summary, the results of our study show that progesterone can inhibit lung adenocarcinoma cell growth via mPRα.