Francyne Kubaski

Dr. Francyne Kubaski

UFRGS
+2
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

15Years (2012-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 July 2019 in Transplantation and Cellular Therapy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MTMadeleine Taylor
Madeleine Taylor
SKShaukat Khan
Shaukat Khan
MSMolly Stapleton
Molly Stapleton
JWJianmin Wang
Jianmin Wang
JCJing Chen
Jing Chen
Shunji TomatsuShunji Tomatsu
Shunji Tomatsu
Allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) has proven to be a viable treatment option for a selected group of patients with mucopolysaccharidoses (MPS), including those with MPS types I, II, IVA, VI, and VII. Early diagnosis and timely referral to an expert in MPS are critical, followed by a complete examination and evaluation by a multidisciplinary team, including a transplantation physician. Treatment recommendations for MPS are based on multiple biological, sociological, and financial factors, including type of MPS, clinical severity, prognosis, present clinical signs and symptoms (disease stage), age at onset, rate of progression, family factors and expectations, financial burden, feasibility, availability, risks and benefits of available therapies such as HSCT, enzyme replacement therapy (ERT), surgical interventions, and other supportive care. International collaboration and data review are critical to evaluating the therapeutic efficacy and adverse effects of HSCT for MPS. Collaborative efforts to assess HSCT for MPS have been ongoing since the first attempt at HSCT in a patient with MPS reported in 1981. The accumulation of data since then has made it possible to identify early outcomes (ie, transplantation outcomes) and long-term disease-specific outcomes resulting from HSCT. The recent identification of predictive factors and the development of innovative regimens have significantly improved the outcomes of both engraftment failure and transplantation-related mortality. Assessment of long-term outcomes has considered a variety of factors, including type of MPS, type of graft, age at transplantation, and stage of disease progression, among others. Studies on long-term outcomes are considered a key factor in the use of HSCT in patients with MPS. These studies have shown the effects and limitations of HSCT on improving disease manifestations and quality of life. In this review, we summarize the efficacy, side effects, risks, and cost of HSCT for each type of MPS.

1 October 2017 in Transplantation and Cellular Therapy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Francyne KubaskiFrancyne Kubaski
Francyne Kubaski
HYHiromasa Yabe
Hiromasa Yabe
YSYasuyuki Suzuki
Yasuyuki Suzuki
TSToshiyuki Seto
Toshiyuki Seto
THTakashi Hamazaki
Takashi Hamazaki
Shunji TomatsuShunji Tomatsu
Shunji Tomatsu
There is limited information regarding the long-term outcomes of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for mucopolysaccharidosis II (MPS II). In this study, clinical, biochemical, and radiologic findings were assessed in patients who underwent HSCT and/or enzyme replacement therapy (ERT). Demographic data for 146 HSCT patients were collected from 27 new cases and 119 published cases and were compared with 51 ERT and 15 untreated cases. Glycosaminoglycan (GAG) levels were analyzed by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry in blood samples from HSCT, ERT, and untreated patients as well as age-matched controls. Long-term magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings were investigated in 13 treated patients (6 ERT and 7 HSCT). Mean age at HSCT was 5.5 years (range, 2 to 21.4 years) in new patients and 5.5 years (range, 10 months to 19.8 years) in published cases. None of the 27 new patients died as a direct result of the HSCT procedure. Graft-versus-host disease occurred in 8 (9%) out of 85 published cases, and 9 (8%) patients died from transplantation-associated complications. Most HSCT patients showed greater improvement in somatic features, joint movements, and activity of daily living than the ERT patients. GAG levels in blood were significantly reduced by ERT and levels were even lower after HSCT. HSCT patients showed either improvement or no progression of abnormal findings in brain MRI while abnormal findings became more extensive after ERT. HSCT seems to be more effective than ERT for MPS II in a wide range of disease manifestations and could be considered as a treatment option for this condition.

1 September 2018 in Molecular Genetics and Metabolism
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MSMolly Stapleton
Molly Stapleton
NANivethitha Arunkumar
Nivethitha Arunkumar
Francyne KubaskiFrancyne Kubaski
Francyne Kubaski
RMRobert W. Mason
Robert W. Mason
OTOrii Tadao
Orii Tadao
Shunji TomatsuShunji Tomatsu
Shunji Tomatsu

22 March 2020 in Diagnostics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Francyne KubaskiFrancyne Kubaski
Francyne Kubaski
Fabiano PoswarFabiano Poswar
Fabiano Poswar
KMKristiane MICHELIN Michelin-Tirelli
Kristiane MICHELIN Michelin-Tirelli
MBMaira Graeff Burin
Maira Graeff Burin
DMDiana Málaga
Diana Málaga
Roberto GiuglianiRoberto Giugliani
Roberto Giugliani
The mucopolysaccharidoses (MPSs) include 11 different conditions caused by specific enzyme deficiencies in the degradation pathway of glycosaminoglycans (GAGs). Although most MPS types present increased levels of GAGs in tissues, including blood and urine, diagnosis is challenging as specific enzyme assays are needed for the correct diagnosis. Enzyme assays are usually performed in blood, with some samples (as leukocytes) providing a final diagnosis, while others (such as dried blood spots) still being considered as screening methods. The identification of variants in the specific genes that encode each MPS-related enzyme is helpful for diagnosis confirmation (when needed), carrier detection, genetic counseling, prenatal diagnosis (preferably in combination with enzyme assays) and phenotype prediction. Although the usual diagnostic flow in high-risk patients starts with the measurement of urinary GAGs, it continues with specific enzyme assays and is completed with mutation identification; there is a growing trend to have genotype-based investigations performed at the beginning of the investigation. In such cases, confirmation of pathogenicity of the variants identified should be confirmed by measurement of enzyme activity and/or identification and/or quantification of GAG species. As there is a growing number of countries performing newborn screening for MPS diseases, the investigation of a low enzyme activity by the measurement of GAG species concentration and identification of gene mutations in the same DBS sample is recommended before the suspicion of MPS is taken to the family. With specific therapies already available for most MPS patients, and with clinical trials in progress for many conditions, the specific diagnosis of MPS as early as possible is becoming increasingly necessary. In this review, we describe traditional and the most up to date diagnostic methods for mucopolysaccharidoses.

16 March 2020 in Diagnostics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Francyne KubaskiFrancyne Kubaski
Francyne Kubaski
Fabiano PoswarFabiano Poswar
Fabiano Poswar
KMKristiane MICHELIN Michelin-Tirelli
Kristiane MICHELIN Michelin-Tirelli
UMUrsula Matte
Ursula Matte
DHDafne D. Horovitz
Dafne D. Horovitz
Roberto GiuglianiRoberto Giugliani
Roberto Giugliani
Mucopolysaccharidosis type I (MPS I) is caused by the deficiency of α-l-iduronidase, leading to the storage of dermatan and heparan sulfate. There is a broad phenotypical spectrum with the presence or absence of neurological impairment. The classical form is known as Hurler syndrome, the intermediate form as Hurler–Scheie, and the most attenuated form is known as Scheie syndrome. Phenotype seems to be largely influenced by genotype. Patients usually develop several somatic symptoms such as abdominal hernias, extensive dermal melanocytosis, thoracolumbar kyphosis odontoid dysplasia, arthropathy, coxa valga and genu valgum, coarse facial features, respiratory and cardiac impairment. The diagnosis is based on the quantification of α-l-iduronidase coupled with glycosaminoglycan analysis and gene sequencing. Guidelines for treatment recommend hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for young Hurler patients (usually at less than 30 months of age). Intravenous enzyme replacement is approved and is the standard of care for attenuated—Hurler–Scheie and Scheie—forms (without cognitive impairment) and for the late-diagnosed severe—Hurler—cases. Intrathecal enzyme replacement therapy is under evaluation, but it seems to be safe and effective. Other therapeutic approaches such as gene therapy, gene editing, stop codon read through, and therapy with small molecules are under development. Newborn screening is now allowing the early identification of MPS I patients, who can then be treated within their first days of life, potentially leading to a dramatic change in the disease’s progression. Supportive care is very important to improve quality of life and might include several surgeries throughout the life course.

11 August 2014 in Metabolites
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Shunji TomatsuShunji Tomatsu
Shunji Tomatsu
TSTsutomu Shimada
Tsutomu Shimada
RMRobert W. Mason
Robert W. Mason
AMAdriana M. Montaño
Adriana M. Montaño
JKJoan Kelly
Joan Kelly
TOTadao Orii
Tadao Orii
Mucopolysaccharidoses (MPS) are a group of lysosomal storage disorders caused by deficiency of the lysosomal enzymes essential for catabolism of glycosaminoglycans (GAGs). Accumulation of undegraded GAGs results in dysfunction of multiple organs, resulting in distinct clinical manifestations. A range of methods have been developed to measure specific GAGs in various human samples to investigate diagnosis, prognosis, pathogenesis, GAG interaction with other molecules, and monitoring therapeutic efficacy. We established ELISA, liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS), and an automated high-throughput mass spectrometry (HT-MS/MS) system (RapidFire) to identify epitopes (ELISA) or disaccharides (MS/MS) derived from different GAGs (dermatan sulfate, heparan sulfate, keratan sulfate, and/or chondroitin sulfate). These methods have a high sensitivity and specificity in GAG analysis, applicable to the analysis of blood, urine, tissues, and cells. ELISA is feasible, sensitive, and reproducible with the standard equipment. HT-MS/MS yields higher throughput than conventional LC-MS/MS-based methods while the HT-MS/MS system does not have a chromatographic step and cannot distinguish GAGs with identical molecular weights, leading to a limitation of measurements for some specific GAGs. Here we review the advantages and disadvantages of these methods for measuring GAG levels in biological specimens. We also describe an unexpected secondary elevation of keratan sulfate in patients with MPS that is an indirect consequence of disruption of catabolism of other GAGs.