Daniela Rega

Dr. Daniela Rega

1Colorectal Surgical Oncology, Abdominal Oncology Department, Istituto Nazionale per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori, "Fondazione G. Pascale" IRCSS, Naples, Italy

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

18Years (2009-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
3 July 2015 in Oncology Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Marina De RosaMarina De Rosa
Marina De Rosa
UPUgo Pace
Ugo Pace
DRDaniela Rega
Daniela Rega
VCValeria Costabile
Valeria Costabile
FDFrancesca Duraturo
Francesca Duraturo
PDPaolo Delrio
Paolo Delrio
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common type of cancer worldwide and a leading cause of cancer death. Surgery represents the mainstay of treatment in early cases but often patients are primarily diagnosed in an advanced stage of disease and sometimes also distant metastases are present. Neoadjuvant therapy is therefore needed but drug resistance may influence response and concur to recurrent disease. At molecular level, it is a very heterogeneous group of diseases with about 30% of hereditary or familial cases. During colorectal adenocarcinomas development, epithelial cells from gastrointestinal trait acquire sequential genetic and epigenetic mutations in specific oncogenes and/or tumour suppressor genes, causing CRC onset, progression and metastasis. Molecular characterization of cancer associated mutations gives valuable information about disease prognosis and response to the therapy. Very early diagnosis and personalised care, as well as a better knowledge of molecular basis of its onset and progression, are therefore crucial to obtain a cure of CRC. In this review, we describe updated genetics, current diagnosis and management of CRC pointing out the extreme need for a multidisciplinary approach to achieve the best results in patient outcomes.

21 April 2015 in Colorectal Disease
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DHDieter Hahnloser
Dieter Hahnloser
RCRamon Cantero
Ramon Cantero
GSGervasio Salgado
Gervasio Salgado
DDDaniel Dindo
Daniel Dindo
DRDaniela Rega
Daniela Rega
PDPaolo Delrio
Paolo Delrio

29 July 2019 in Scientific Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DRDaniela Rega
Daniela Rega
UPUgo Pace
Ugo Pace
DSDario Scala
Dario Scala
PCPaolo Chiodini
Paolo Chiodini
VGVincenza Granata
Vincenza Granata
PDPaolo Delrio
Paolo Delrio
Extended right or left hemicolectomy are the most common surgical treatments for splenic flexure colon cancer. Extended resection (including distal pancreasectomy and/or splenectomy), has been often indicated for the treatment for the splenic flexure cancer, because the lymphatic drainage at this site is poorly defined and assumed as heterogeneous. Between January 2006 and May 2016, 103 patients with splenic flexure colon cancer were enrolled in the study. We evaluated the clinicopathological findings and outcomes of all patients and associated them to the different surgical treatment. Out of 103 selected cases an extended right hemicolectomy was performed in 22 (21.4%) patients, an extended left hemicolectomy in 24 (23.3%) patients, a segmental resection of the splenic flexure in 57 (55.3%) patients; the combined resection of adjacent organs showing tumor adherence was carried out in 11 (10.7%) patients. The tumor infiltrated near organs (T4) in 5 patients. No significant differences in complications were found among the three groups. In all groups no differences were found in the total number of harvested lymphnodes. After a median follow-up of 42 months, 30 recurrences and 19 deaths occurred (12 for tumor progression). There was no difference in overall and progression free survival among the three different surgical treatments. According to our results, the partial resection of splenic flexure was not associated with a worse prognosis and it was leading for a satisfactory oncological outcome. It is our opinion that the extended surgery is seldomly indicated to cure splenic flexure cancer.

24 June 2015 in Abdominal Radiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
VGVincenza Granata
Vincenza Granata
OCOrlando Catalano
Orlando Catalano
RFRoberta Fusco
Roberta Fusco
Fabiana TatangeloFabiana Tatangelo
Fabiana Tatangelo
DRDaniela Rega
Daniela Rega
Antonella PetrilloAntonella Petrillo
Antonella Petrillo

1 August 2010 in Pancreas
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RCRiccardo Casadei
Riccardo Casadei
CRClaudio Ricci
Claudio Ricci
DRDaniela Rega
Daniela Rega
MDMarielda D'AMbra
Marielda D'AMbra
Raffaele PezzilliRaffaele Pezzilli
Raffaele Pezzilli
FMFrancesco Minni
Francesco Minni
Pancreatic endocrine tumors (PETs) are usually small, benign or low-grade malignant, and surgery should preserve the pancreatic parenchyma as much as possible. The aim of the study was to evaluate the postoperative and long-term survival of patients undergoing enucleation in small PETs. Of 82 patients having PETs, 46 with tumor less than 4 cm in diameter, without distant metastases and with R0 resection by final pathologic examination, were included in this study. Enucleation was performed when the tumor did not involve the main pancreatic duct and in the absence of peripancreatic lymphadenopathy (group A); a typical resection was carried out in all other cases (group B). The 2 groups were compared regarding postoperative mortality and morbidity, pancreatic fistula, postoperative hospital stay, reoperation, World Health Organization classification, TNM stage, recurrence, and long-term survival. There were 15 patients (32.6%) in group A and 31 (67.4%) in group B. Postoperative and long-term results were similar in the 2 groups, whereas World Health Organization classification was significantly different; enucleation was performed more frequently than typical R0 resection in benign tumors (P = 0.009). Enucleation should be reserved for patients having benign PETs less than 4 cm in diameter and far from the main pancreatic duct.

2 July 2010 in Updates in Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
RCRiccardo Casadei
Riccardo Casadei
FMFrancesco Monari
Francesco Monari
SBSalvatore Buscemi
Salvatore Buscemi
MLMarco Laterza
Marco Laterza
CRClaudio Ricci
Claudio Ricci
FMFrancesco Minni
Francesco Minni