Dimitrios Rekkas

Dr. Dimitrios Rekkas

Department of Pharmacy, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens 15784, Greece

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

27Years (2000-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 February 2018 in European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Francesca ButtiniFrancesca Buttini
Francesca Buttini
SRStavroula Rozou
Stavroula Rozou
ARAlessandra Rossi
Alessandra Rossi
VZVarvara Zoumpliou
Varvara Zoumpliou
DRDimitrios Rekkas
Dimitrios Rekkas

12 September 2021 in Pharmaceutics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SXStyliani Xiroudaki
Styliani Xiroudaki
Aurélie SchoubbenAurélie Schoubben
Aurélie Schoubben
Stefano GiovagnoliStefano Giovagnoli
Stefano Giovagnoli
DRDimitrios Rekkas
Dimitrios Rekkas
During the last decades, the term “drug delivery systems” (DDSs) has almost fully replaced previously used terms, such as “dosage forms”, in an attempt to emphasize the importance of the drug carrier in ensuring the claimed safety and effectiveness of the product. However, particularly in the case of delivery devices, the term “system”, which by definition implies a profound knowledge of each single part and their interactions, is not always fully justified when using the DDS term. Within this context, dry powder inhalers (DPIs), as systems to deliver drugs via inhalation to the lungs, require a deep understanding of the complex formulation–device–patient interplay. As of now and despite the progress made in particle engineering and devices design, DPIs’ clinical performance is limited by variable patients’ breathing patterns. To circumvent this pitfall, next-generation DPIs should ideally adapt to the different respiratory capacity of individuals across age, health conditions, and other related factors. In this context, the recent wave of digitalization in the health care and industrial sectors may drive DPI technology towards addressing a personalized device–formulation–patient liaison. In this review, evolving technologies are explored and analyzed to outline the progress made as well as the gaps to fill to align novel DPIs technologies with the systems theory approach.

14 December 2010 in Pharmaceutical Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
EKEvdokia Korakianiti
Evdokia Korakianiti
DRDimitrios Rekkas
Dimitrios Rekkas

28 August 2025 in Nanomaterials
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LALefkothea Antonara
Lefkothea Antonara
ETEfstathia Triantafyllopoulou
Efstathia Triantafyllopoulou
MCMaria Chountoulesi
Maria Chountoulesi
Natassa PippaNatassa Pippa
Natassa Pippa
PDParaskevas P Dallas
Paraskevas P Dallas
DRDimitrios Rekkas
Dimitrios Rekkas
Lipid-based nanocarriers are ideal drug delivery systems for transdermal administration due to their biocompatibility and biodegradability. Their lipophilicity and/or similarity to the natural lipids of the epidermis enable intermolecular interactions with the lipid membrane and therefore result in effective passage through the skin. The purpose of this review is to focus on lipid-based drug delivery nanoplatforms administered via the transdermal route by summarizing the most recent developments with the intention of fast clinical translation. Liposomes, solid lipid nanoparticles (SLNs), nanostructured lipid carriers (NLCs), ethosomes, and transfersomes exhibit ideal physicochemical characteristics and encapsulation efficiency to enhance the effectiveness of the incorporated Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients (APIs). The state of the art for fabricating transcutaneous lipid drug delivery nanoparticles and the strategies for overcoming the current obstacles, as well as the added value of novel formulations, will be discussed within the scope of Quality by Design applications. The limitations and challenges that still exist will also be considered.

1 December 2000 in AAPS PharmSciTech
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
EKEvdokia S. Korakianiti
Evdokia S. Korakianiti
DRDimitrios Rekkas
Dimitrios Rekkas
PDParaskevas P. Dallas
Paraskevas P. Dallas
NCNikolaos H. Choulis
Nikolaos H. Choulis

21 September 2016 in Pharmacy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JAJeffrey Atkinson
Jeffrey Atkinson
Kristien De PaepeKristien De Paepe
Kristien De Paepe
APAntonio Sánchez Pozo
Antonio Sánchez Pozo
DRDimitrios Rekkas
Dimitrios Rekkas
Daisy VolmerDaisy Volmer
Daisy Volmer
CSChris Van Schravendijk
Chris Van Schravendijk
This paper presents the results of the second European Delphi round on the ranking of competences for pharmacy practice and compares these data to those of the first round already published. A comparison of the numbers of respondents, distribution by age group, country of residence, etc., shows that whilst the student population of respondents changed from Round 1 to 2, the populations of the professional groups (community, hospital and industrial pharmacists, pharmacists in other occupations and academics) were more stable. Results are given for the consensus of ranking and the scores of ranking of 50 competences for pharmacy practice. This two-stage, large-scale Delphi process harmonized and validated the Quality Assurance in European Pharmacy Education and Training (PHAR-QA) framework and ensured the adoption by the pharmacy profession of a framework proposed by the academic pharmacy community. The process of evaluation and validation of ranking of competences by the pharmacy profession is now complete, and the PHAR-QA consortium will now put forward a definitive PHAR-QA framework of competences for pharmacy practice.