Paraschiva CHERECHES-PANTA

Dr. Paraschiva CHERECHES-PANTA

Mother and Child, Disc. Pediatrics, Iuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Cluj, Romania
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

20Years (2007-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
12 April 2023 in Journal of Clinical Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
VTValentina Tarau-Sas
Valentina Tarau-Sas
Paraschiva CHERECHES-PANTAParaschiva CHERECHES-PANTA
Paraschiva CHERECHES-PANTA
DBDiana Alexandra Borcau
Diana Alexandra Borcau
CSCristina-Nicoleta Schnell
Cristina-Nicoleta Schnell
EIEdita-Gabriela Ichim
Edita-Gabriela Ichim
SMSorin Claudiu Man
Sorin Claudiu Man
Electronic nose (e-nose) is a new technology applied for the identification of volatile organic compounds (VOC) in breath air. Measuring VOC in exhaled breath can adequately identify airway inflammation, especially in asthma. Its noninvasive character makes e-nose an attractive technology applicable in pediatrics. We hypothesized that an electronic nose could discriminate the breath prints of patients with asthma from controls. A cross-sectional study was conducted and included 35 pediatric patients. Eleven cases and seven controls formed the two training models (models A and B). Another nine cases and eight controls formed the external validation group. Exhaled breath samples were analyzed using Cyranose 320, Smith Detections, Pasadena, CA, USA. The discriminative ability of breath prints was investigated by principal component analysis (PCA) and canonical discriminative analysis (CDA). Cross-validation accuracy (CVA) was calculated. For the external validation step, accuracy, sensitivity and specificity were calculated. Duplicate sampling of exhaled breath was obtained for ten patients. E-nose was able to discriminate between the controls and asthmatic patient group with a CVA of 63.63% and an M-distance of 3.13 for model A and a CVA of 90% and an M-distance of 5.55 for model B in the internal validation step. In the second step of external validation, accuracy, sensitivity and specificity were 64%, 77% and 50%, respectively, for model A, and 58%, 66% and 50%, respectively, for model B. Between paired breath sample fingerprints, there were no significant differences. An electronic nose can discriminate pediatric patients with asthma from controls, but the accuracy obtained in the external validation was lower than the CVA obtained in the internal validation step.

TBTeodora Irina Adam Bonci
Teodora Irina Adam Bonci
Paraschiva CHERECHES-PANTAParaschiva CHERECHES-PANTA
Paraschiva CHERECHES-PANTA
EBEduard- Alexandru Bonci
Eduard- Alexandru Bonci
SMSorin Claudiu Man
Sorin Claudiu Man
A(Ancuţa Benedec (Cutaş)
Ancuţa Benedec (Cutaş)
AIAlexandru Irimie
Alexandru Irimie
Even though vitamin D is widely acknowledged as having a potential immunomodulatory role in asthma, its exact beneficial mechanisms are yet to be clarified. An optimal serum 25-hydroxy-vitamin D (25-OH-VitD) level in pediatric asthma patients might not rely solely on the effect of dose-dependent vitamin D3 intake, but might also be influenced by factors related to insufficient asthma control. We aimed to survey the prevalence of serum 25-OH-VitD deficiency and analyze whether suboptimal levels were associated with asthma severity factors. The current cross-sectional study enrolled 131 pediatric asthma or asthma-suggestive recurrent wheezing patients, for whom serum 25-OH-VitD, IgE, and eosinophil count were assessed. The prevalence of suboptimal serum 25-OH-VitD was 58.8%. A suboptimal vitamin D status was associated with asthma exacerbation in the previous month (p = 0.02). Even under seasonal oral vitamin D3 supplementation, patients with a positive history of asthma attack in the previous four weeks presented significantly lower serum 25-OH-VitD concentrations, compared to their peers with no disease exacerbation. In conclusion, sequential measurements of serum 25-OH-VitD might prove useful for future studies evaluating the dynamic changes in vitamin D3 status in regard to asthma, especially in symptomatic patients.

23 August 2007 in Journal of Perinatology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Paraschiva CHERECHES-PANTAParaschiva CHERECHES-PANTA
Paraschiva CHERECHES-PANTA
MNM V Nanulescu
M V Nanulescu
MCM Culea
M Culea
NPN Palibroda
N Palibroda

4 January 2023 in Children
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CPClaudia Felicia Pop
Claudia Felicia Pop
PCPetronela Alina Coblisan
Petronela Alina Coblisan
LCLigia Capalna
Ligia Capalna
Paraschiva CHERECHES-PANTAParaschiva CHERECHES-PANTA
Paraschiva CHERECHES-PANTA
ABAnca Dana Buzoianu
Anca Dana Buzoianu
Ioana Corina BocsanIoana Corina Bocsan
Ioana Corina Bocsan
Vaccines represent an important preventive strategy in paediatric populations, but the rate of vaccination has been constantly declining in the last decade. Concerns about vaccines’ safety represent one of the main causes of vaccine hesitancy among parents. The aim of this study was the analysis of the immediate adverse reactions induced by vaccines included in the national program of immunization for the first year of life. Method: Eighty-one children born between 1st of January 2018 and 31st of March 2019 were included. The vaccination refusal rate, and incidence and severity of adverse effects induced by three mandatory vaccines (Hexavalent, Prevenar 13 and MMR) were analyzed. The level of parents’ education and the sources of information that were consulted in order to understand the adverse effects were also analyzed. Results and conclusions: The rate of adverse events was lower than 30% of the total number of doses, and most of them were mild. The incidence and severity of vaccine-induced adverse effects were correlated with prematurity. The vaccine hesitancy rate was lower than the national one, possibly due to a high level of education and good information provided by doctors that might have led to parents’ concerns regarding vaccination being answered.

1 January 2011
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Paraschiva CHERECHES-PANTAParaschiva CHERECHES-PANTA
Paraschiva CHERECHES-PANTA
SCSorin C
Sorin C
DDDiana Dumitrescu
Diana Dumitrescu
MMMirela Marshall
Mirela Marshall
IMIleana Mirestean
Ileana Mirestean
MNMircea V Nanulescu
Mircea V Nanulescu

16 October 2025 in Children
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Paraschiva CHERECHES-PANTAParaschiva CHERECHES-PANTA
Paraschiva CHERECHES-PANTA
IMIoana Marica
Ioana Marica
VTValentina Tarau-Sas
Valentina Tarau-Sas
ABAlina Petronela Bouari-Coblișan
Alina Petronela Bouari-Coblișan
SMSorin Claudiu Man
Sorin Claudiu Man
Background: Asthma is the most common chronic disease during childhood. Spirometry is recommended as a reliable lung function test. Several studies have demonstrated the lack of use of spirometry for both diagnostic confirmation and monitoring. Using subjective symptom control tests alone may underestimate the risk for future asthma attacks. Methods/Objectives: We conducted a retrospective, observational study in a single pediatric centre in Romania. The main objectives of the study were to analyse the quality of spirometry in children and to emphasise the importance of performing accurate spirometry for asthma monitoring. The secondary objective was to evaluate if forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) and mid-maximum expiratory flow (MMEF) values are predictive markers for future exacerbations in children with asthma. Results: The study group included 416 patients between 5 and 18 years who performed at least one spirometry. The success rate for spirometry in our study was 66.3%. In a subsequent study group of 88 patients we monitored spirometry initially and after 12 months. We found a statistically significant difference between FEV1 and MMEF in the controlled, partially controlled and uncontrolled groups (p = 0.0102 and p = 0.0001). Our study showed no association between FEV1 and risk for exacerbations (Rs = −0.156, p = 0.146) and an acceptably negative (Rs = −0.30) and statistically significant (p = 0.040) correlation between initial MMEF values and the number of exacerbations. Conclusions: Low initial MMEF values correlate with the number of exacerbations in a 12-month follow-up period. This suggests that evaluating MMEF alongside FEV1 in children with asthma could contribute to better identification of the risk of exacerbation.