Sho Takahashi

Dr. Sho Takahashi

University of Tsukuba Hospital, Tsukuba, Japan

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

18Years (2009-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 June 2009 in Psychogeriatrics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
STSho Takahashi
Sho Takahashi
KMKatsuyoshi Mizukami
Katsuyoshi Mizukami
FYFumihiko Yasuno
Fumihiko Yasuno
TATakashi Asada
Takashi Asada

1 March 2022 in Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YKYasuto Kunii
Yasuto Kunii
HUHitomi Usukura
Hitomi Usukura
KOKotaro Otsuka
Kotaro Otsuka
MMMasaharu Maeda
Masaharu Maeda
HYHirooki Yabe
Hirooki Yabe
HTHiroaki Tomita
Hiroaki Tomita
Post‐disaster mental health and psychosocial support have drawn attention in Japan after the 1995 Great Hanshin‐Awaji Earthquake, with mental health care centers for the affected communities being organized. After the catastrophe, a reconstruction budget was allocated to organize mental health care centers to provide psychosocial support for communities affected by the 2007 Chūetsu offshore earthquake, the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake, and the 2016 Kumamoto Earthquake. There were several major improvements in post‐disaster mental health measures after the Great East Japan Earthquake. The Disaster Psychiatric Assistance Team system was organized after the earthquake to orchestrate disaster response related to the psychiatric health system and mental health of the affected communities. Special mental health care efforts were drawn to the communities affected by the nuclear power plant accident through Chemical, Biological, Radiological, Nuclear, and high yield Explosives, being succeeded by measures against the coronavirus pandemic. As another new movement after the Great East Japan Earthquake, the number of surveys involving communities affected by disasters has soared. More than 10 times the number of scientific publications were made in English during the decade following the Great East Japan Earthquake, compared with the previous decades. In this review, we examined the results and issues acquired in the 10 years since the Great East Japan Earthquake, proposing evidence‐based disaster psychiatry as the direction of future mental health measures related to emergency preparedness and response.

MGMelissa Genereux
Melissa Genereux
PSPhilip Schluter
Philip Schluter
STSho Takahashi
Sho Takahashi
SUShiori Usami
Shiori Usami
SMSonoe Mashino
Sonoe Mashino
YKYoshiharu Kim
Yoshiharu Kim
Emergencies and disasters typically affect entire communities, cause substantial losses and disruption, and result in a significant and persistent mental health burden. There is currently a paucity of evidence on safe and effective individual- and community-level strategies for improving mental health before, during, and after such events. In October 2018, the World Health Organization (WHO) Centre for Health Development (WHO Kobe Centre) convened a meeting bringing together leading Asia Pacific and international disaster research experts. The expert meeting identified key research needs in five major areas, one being “Psychosocial management before, during, and after emergencies and disasters”. Experts for this research area identified critical gaps in observational research (i.e., the monitoring of long-term psychological consequences) and interventional research (i.e., the development and evaluation of individual- and community-level interventions). Three key research issues were identified. First, experts underscored the need for a standardized and psychometrically robust instrument that classified the mental health/psychosocial risk of people within both a clinical and community setting. Then, the need for a standardization of methods for prevention, screening, diagnosis, and treatment for affected people was highlighted. Finally, experts called for a better identification of before, during, and after emergency or disaster assets associated with greater community resilience.

22 October 2022 in Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
IKIto Kawakami
Ito Kawakami
JIJun‐Ichi Iga
Jun‐Ichi Iga
STSho Takahashi
Sho Takahashi
YLYi‐Ting Lin
Yi‐Ting Lin
HFHiroshige Fujishiro
Hiroshige Fujishiro
Senile depression (SD) is a heterogeneous syndrome. Several clinical profiles are more likely to appear in SD than in early‐life depression, but it remains unclear whether the pathophysiology is different. The prevalence of dementia increases with aging, and the underlying pathophysiological processes in the preclinical phase begin even before cognitive deficits or neurological signs appear. SD may be either a risk factor for developing dementia or a prodromal stage of dementia. The inconsistent findings regarding the association between SD and incident dementia may be attributable to the neuropathological heterogeneity underlying SD. Most studies have focused on patients with the clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer disease (AD) as an outcome, but several clinicopathological studies suggest that primary age‐related tauopathy and argyrophilic grain disease may account for a proportion of cases clinically misdiagnosed as AD in the elderly population. Furthermore, most AD cases have additional neuropathologic changes such as cerebrovascular disease and Lewy body disease. Here, we review the neuropathological findings linking SD to incident dementia, focusing on common age‐related neuropathologies. In particular, the roles of disturbance of neural circuity, imbalance of monoaminergic systems, dysregulation of the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis, and elevated neuroinflammatory status are discussed. Finally, we review the current treatment of SD in the context of age‐related neuropathological changes.

STSho Takahashi
Sho Takahashi
YTYoshifumi Takagi
Yoshifumi Takagi
YFYasuhisa Fukuo
Yasuhisa Fukuo
TATETSUAKI ARAI
TETSUAKI ARAI
MWMichiko Watari
Michiko Watari
HTHirokazu Tachikawa
Hirokazu Tachikawa
Background: How long acute mental health needs continue after the disaster are problems which must be addressed in the treatment of victims. The aim of this study is to determine victims’ needs by examining activity data from Disaster Psychiatric Assistance Teams (DPATs) in Japan. Methods: Data from four disasters were extracted from the disaster mental health information support system (DMHISS) database, and the transition of the number of consultations and the activity period were examined. Results: Common to all four disasters, the number of consultations increased rapidly from 0–2 days, reaching a peak within about a week. The partial correlation coefficient between the number of days of activity and the maximum number of victims showed significance. The number of victims and days of activity can be used to obtain a regression curve. Conclusions: This is the first report to reveal that mental health needs are the greatest in the hyper-acute stage, and the need for consultation and the duration of needs depends on the number of victims.

YTYoshifumi Takagi
Yoshifumi Takagi
STSho Takahashi
Sho Takahashi
YFYasuhisa Fukuo
Yasuhisa Fukuo
TATETSUAKI ARAI
TETSUAKI ARAI
HTHirokazu Tachikawa
Hirokazu Tachikawa
This study analyzed the support activities that the Disaster Psychiatric Assistance Team (DPAT) in Japan provided following four previous disasters (a volcanic eruption, a mudslide, a flood, and an earthquake) to identify links between the disaster type and the characteristics of acute stage mental disorders observed. Using Disaster Mental Health Information Support System database records of consultations with patients supported by the DPAT during the survey period from 2013 (when DPAT was launched) to 2016, we performed cross-tabulations and investigated significant differences using chi-squared tests. For expected values less than 5, Fisher’s exact test was performed. Frequently occurring acute-stage symptoms after a disaster include anxiety, sleep problems, mood and affect, and physical symptoms. The affected population characteristics, victim attributes, severity of damage sustained, and evacuation status were the chief factors that influenced acute-stage mental health symptoms. The psychiatric symptoms detected in our study together with the results of diagnoses are important for determining the types of early interventions needed during the acute stage of a disaster. By sharing baseline mental health information, together with disaster-related characteristics highlighted in this study, mental health providers are better able to predict future possible mental disorders and symptoms.