Phillip Minnaar

Dr. Phillip Minnaar


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

11Years (2016-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 September 2017 in International Journal of Food Microbiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PMPhillip Minnaar
Phillip Minnaar
NJN.P. Jolly
N.P. Jolly
VPV. Paulsen
V. Paulsen
Heinrich Du PlessisHeinrich Du Plessis
Heinrich Du Plessis
MRM. Van Der Rijst
M. Van Der Rijst

1 December 2019 in Food Chemistry: X
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PMPhillip Minnaar
Phillip Minnaar
HPH.W. du Plessis
H.W. du Plessis
NJN.P. Jolly
N.P. Jolly
MRM. van der Rijst
M. van der Rijst
MTM. du Toit
M. du Toit
Syrah must was co-inoculated with mixed cultures of Saccharomyces + O. oeni/Lb. plantarum and Saccharomyces + non-Saccharomyces + O. oeni/Lb. plantarum to evaluate the effect on phenolics and sensory attributes. Reference wines were produced by S. cerevisiae. Malvidin-3-O-glucoside, flavan-3-ols, flavonols and phenolic acids were quantified using a RP-HPLC technique. Physicochemical characteristics and sensory attributes were measured. Total acidity and alcohol in mixed co-inoculations were different from reference wines. The concentration of l-malic acid was 7-times less in mixed co-inoculations. Mixed co-inoculations had ca. 1.3-times more malvidin-3-O-glucoside and phenolic acids than reference wines. Flavan-3-ols and flavonols were not different between mixed co-inoculations and reference wines. Acidity and astringency were least in mixed co-inoculations. Mouthfeel and bitterness least in S. cerevisiae wines. Tasters preferred mixed co-inoculated wines. Mixed co-inoculation is a strategy to contemplate for Syrah vinification but the modalities of inoculation need further investigation. Success depends on a suitable combination of yeast/bacteria and consideration of strain variation.

10 October 2017 in South African Journal of Enology and Viticulture
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PMPhillip Minnaar
Phillip Minnaar
Heinrich Du PlessisHeinrich Du Plessis
Heinrich Du Plessis
VPV. Paulsen
V. Paulsen
NNN. Ntushelo
N. Ntushelo
NJN.P. Jolly
N.P. Jolly
MTM. du Toit
M. du Toit
Wine consumers predominantly use visual, sensory and textual descriptors as quality/preference indicators to describe olfactory sensations. In this study, different wines were analysed to generate relevant chemical and sensory characterisation data and attributes. Sequential inoculation of Syrah grape must was performed with a combination of Saccharomyces yeast, non-Saccharomyces yeasts and lactic acid bacteria for the possible improvement of Syrah wine quality. Selected anthocyanins, flavan-3-ols, flavonols and phenolic acids were quantified in Syrah wines using the reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography photodiode array detection (RP-HPLC-DAD) technique. Sensory (descriptive evaluation) and physicochemical/oenological parameters (Winescan® and OenoFoss™) results were compared to phenolic compound concentrations. Phenolic compound concentrations increased in Syrah wines made with a combination of a Saccharomyces reference yeast, non-Saccharomyces yeasts and lactic acid bacteria. Syrah wines made with a combination of Metschnikowia pulcherrima + Saccharomyces cerevisiae + Oenococcus oeni , and M. pulcherrima + S. cerevisiae + Lactobacillus plantarum , had higher flavonol concentrations compared to wines made without lactic acid bacteria. Syrah wines made with a combination of Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Sc) + Oenococcus oeni (LAB1) were highest in phenolic acid concentrations. Syrah wines made with a combination of M. pulcherrima + S. cerevisiae + L. plantarum had higher total anthocyanins than wines made without lactic acid bacteria. Syrah wine sensory attributes, viz. mouthfeel and astringency, correlated with a combination of lactic acid bacteria and yeast treatments. Syrah wines made with a combination of yeast and lactic acid bacteria (LAB) scored highest in overall quality. Indications are that the S. cerevisiae reference yeast retained more phenolic compounds during fermentation when compared to wines made with a combination of non-Saccharomyces yeasts and LAB. The improved red colour of Syrah wines may be achieved by sequential inoculation with non-Saccharomyces yeast and LAB. This could be beneficial where winemakers use grape cultivars with low anthocyanin levels in the grape skin to produce wines of improved quality.

1 December 2018 in Food Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PMPhillip Minnaar
Phillip Minnaar
LNLudwe Nyobo
Ludwe Nyobo
NJNeil Jolly
Neil Jolly
NNNombasa Ntushelo
Nombasa Ntushelo
SMSkyé Meiring
Skyé Meiring

1 January 2015 in South African Journal of Enology and Viticulture
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PMPhillip Minnaar
Phillip Minnaar
NNN. Ntushelo
N. Ntushelo
ZNZ. Ngqumba
Z. Ngqumba
VBV. van Breda
V. van Breda
NJN.P. Jolly
N.P. Jolly
Pinotage and Cabernet franc grape must were inoculated with Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Torulaspora delbrueckii yeasts. Differences in colour were observed between Pinotage ( S. cerevisiae ) and Pinotage ( T. delbrueckii ) wines, whereas differences in berry and herbaceous character were observed between Cabernet franc ( S. cerevisiae ) and Cabernet franc ( T. delbrueckii ) wines. Mouthfeel properties between treatments for both wines were not significantly different. Overall quality was slightly higher in wines inoculated with T. delbrueckii compared to wines inoculated with S. cerevisiae . Anthocyanins and flavanols measured in Pinotage wines made with T. delbrueckii were higher compared to Pinotage must inoculated with S. cerevisiae . Cabernet franc wines made with S. cerevisiae were higher in anthocyanin glycoside and flavanol concentrations compared to Cabernet franc wines made with T. delbrueckii . Insignificant differences in acetylated and coumarylated anthocyanins were evident between Cabernet franc ( S. cerevisiae ) and Cabernet franc ( T. delbrueckii ) wines. Principal component analysis showed that epigallocatechin gallate, epicatechin gallate, procyanidin B2, peonidin 3-O-glucoside, delphinidin 3-(6-acetyl) glucoside, petunidin 3-(6-acetyl) glucoside, malvidin 3-(6-acetyl) glucoside and malvidin 3-O-glucoside concentrations were highest in Pinotage wines inoculated with T. delbrueckii . Cabernet franc wines inoculated with S. cerevisiae yeasts were highest in malvidin 3-(6-p-coumaroyl) glucoside, petunidin 3-(6-p-coumaroyl) glucoside, petunidin 3-O-glucoside, epicatechin gallate and epigallocatechin gallate concentrations. Total anthocyanins were highest in Pinotage ( S. cerevisiae ) wines and Cabernet franc ( T. delbrueckii ) wines. Flavanols were highest in Pinotage ( T. delbrueckii ) and Cabernet franc ( S. cerevisiae ) wines. It is evident from the results that yeast species has an impact on the flavonoid concentrations within a grape variety.

10 October 2017 in South African Journal of Enology and Viticulture
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ZNZ. Ngqumba
Z. Ngqumba
NNN. Ntushelo
N. Ntushelo
NJN.P. Jolly
N.P. Jolly
BXB.J. Ximba
B.J. Ximba
PMPhillip Minnaar
Phillip Minnaar
The non-Saccharomyces yeast Torulaspora delbrueckii contributes positively to the sensory properties of wines by affecting aroma and flavour due to changes in alcohols, esters, fatty acids and lactone levels. One of the less-studied aspects of T. delbrueckii is its effect on phenolic compounds relating to sensory attributes. An HPLC-DAD technique was used for the quantification of phenolic compounds in Chenin blanc wines made with S. cerevisiae and two T. delbrueckii yeasts over three vintages. Chemical and sensory data were subjected to ANOVA and PCA. VIN13, M2/1 and VIN13+M2/1 had a positive effect on the phenolic compound concentrations of Chenin blanc wines. Mouthfeel was highest in VIN13+654 wines and astringency highest in VIN13 wines. An association was evident between flavanols, astringency and mouthfeel for the VIN13, M2/1 and VIN13+M2/1 wines. Chenin blanc wines made with M2/1 and VIN13+M2/1 may result in increased phenolic compound concentrations and astringency, whereas 654 and VIN13+654 may result in wines with increased mouthfeel properties.