Olivier Beauchet

Prof. Olivier Beauchet

Department of Medicine, Division of Geriatric Medicine, Sir Mortimer B. Davis-Jewish General Hospital and Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3T 1E2, Canada
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

24Years (2003-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
30 October 2012 in Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Manuel Montero-OdassoManuel Montero-Odasso
Manuel Montero-Odasso
JVJoe Verghese
Joe Verghese
Olivier BeauchetOlivier Beauchet
Olivier Beauchet
JHJeffrey M. Hausdorff
Jeffrey M. Hausdorff

3 May 2011 in The Journal of nutrition, health and aging
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Olivier BeauchetOlivier Beauchet
Olivier Beauchet
BFB. Fantino
B. Fantino
GAGilles Allali
Gilles Allali
SMS. W. Muir
S. W. Muir
Manuel Montero-OdassoManuel Montero-Odasso
Manuel Montero-Odasso
Cedric AnnweilerCedric Annweiler
Cedric Annweiler
To assess the association and the predictive ability of the Timed Up and Go test (TUG) on the occurrence of falls among people aged 65 and older.

31 March 2009 in European Journal of Neurology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Olivier BeauchetOlivier Beauchet
Olivier Beauchet
Cedric AnnweilerCedric Annweiler
Cedric Annweiler
VDV. Dubost
V. Dubost
GAGilles Allali
Gilles Allali
RKR. W. Kressig
R. W. Kressig
FHF. R. Herrmann
F. R. Herrmann

1 June 2016 in Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Olivier BeauchetOlivier Beauchet
Olivier Beauchet
Cedric AnnweilerCedric Annweiler
Cedric Annweiler
MCMichele Callisaya
Michele Callisaya
ACAnne-Marie De Cock
Anne-Marie De Cock
JHJorunn L. Helbostad
Jorunn L. Helbostad
GAGilles Allali
Gilles Allali

1 August 2013 in Journal Of Hypertension
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Olivier BeauchetOlivier Beauchet
Olivier Beauchet
SCSébastien Celle
Sébastien Celle
FRFrédéric Roche
Frédéric Roche
RBRobert Bartha
Robert Bartha
Manuel Montero-OdassoManuel Montero-Odasso
Manuel Montero-Odasso
Cedric AnnweilerCedric Annweiler
Cedric Annweiler
High blood pressure (BP) levels may be associated with brain volume reduction and may contribute to brain atrophy in key brain regions involved in cognition and susceptible to neurodegeneration in Alzheimer's disease. The purpose of this work was to systematically review and quantitatively synthesize the association of BP levels with brain volume reduction in humans. An English Medline, Cochrane Library and PsycINFO search was conducted in June 2012 using the Medical Subject Heading terms 'Blood pressure', 'Hypertension', 'Brain mapping' and 'Brain atrophy'. Of the 609 screened abstracts, 28 studies (4.6%) were included in the qualitative analysis. Twenty-six studies (92.9%) showed a significant association of higher BP levels and/or hypertension with total and/or regional brain volume reduction, the frontal and temporal lobes being particularly affected. In addition, four other studies reported an association between lower BP levels and brain volume reduction. Due to the heterogeneity of methodology and outcomes, random-effects meta-analyses of the mean difference of brain volume could be performed on only seven studies, with a total of 709 cases with hypertension and 1001 controls without hypertension. The findings showed no between-group difference regarding the whole-gray matter volume (summary mean difference = 2.42 cm [95% confidence interval (CI): -2.13 to 6.96]). Conversely, cases with hypertension exhibited lower hippocampus volume compared with controls [summary mean difference = -0.10 cm (95% CI: -0.17 to -0.02)]. These findings provide evidence that high BP levels lead to brain volume reduction, specifically in hippocampus, and may be an important factor that contributes to neurodegeneration in Alzheimer's disease.

3 August 2017 in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Olivier BeauchetOlivier Beauchet
Olivier Beauchet
GAGilles Allali
Gilles Allali
HSHarmehr Sekhon
Harmehr Sekhon
JVJoe Verghese
Joe Verghese
SGSylvie Guilain
Sylvie Guilain
JHJorunn L. Helbostad
Jorunn L. Helbostad
Background. Gait disorders, a highly prevalent condition in older adults, are associated with several adverse health consequences. Gait analysis allows qualitative and quantitative assessments of gait that improves the understanding of mechanisms of gait disorders and the choice of interventions. This manuscript aims 1) to give consensus guidance for clinical and spatiotemporal gait analysis based on the recorded footfalls in older adults aged 65 years and over, and 2) to provide reference values for spatiotemporal gait parameters based on the recorded footfalls in healthy older adults free of cognitive impairment and multi-morbidities. Methods. International experts working in a network of two different consortiums (i.e.; Biomathics and Canadian Gait Consortium) participated in this initiative. First, they identified items of standardized information following the usual procedure of formulation of consensus findings. Second, they merged databases including spatiotemporal gait assessments with GAITRite® system and clinical information from the “Gait, cOgnitiOn & Decline” (GOOD) initiative and the Generation 100 (Gen 100) study. Only healthy - free of cognitive impairment and multi-morbidities (i.e.; ≤3 therapeutics taken daily) - participants aged 65 and older were selected. Age, sex, body mass index, mean values and coefficients of variation (CoV) of gait parameters were used for the analyses. Results. Standardized systematic assessment of three categories of items, which were demographics and clinical information, and gait characteristics (clinical and spatiotemporal gait analysis based on the recorded footfalls), were selected for the proposed guidelines. Two complementary sets of items were distinguished: a minimal data set and a full data set. In addition, a total of 954 participants (mean age 72.8 ± 4.8 years, 45.8% women) were recruited to establish the reference values. Performance of spatiotemporal gait parameters based on the recorded footfalls declined with increasing age (mean values and CoV) and demonstrated sex differences (mean values only). Conclusions. Based on an international multicenter collaboration, we propose consensus guidelines for gait assessment and spatiotemporal gait analysis based on the recorded footfalls, and reference values for healthy older adults.