Virupakshagouda Patil

Prof. Virupakshagouda Patil

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

37Years (1990-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
17 February 2020 in Precision Agriculture
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SVShyamal Virnodkar
Shyamal Virnodkar
VPVinod K. Pachghare
Vinod K. Pachghare
VPVirupakshagouda Patil
Virupakshagouda Patil
SJSunil Kumar Jha
Sunil Kumar Jha

5 December 2017 in Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RMRangaswamy Madugundu
Rangaswamy Madugundu
KAKhalid A. Al-Gaadi
Khalid A. Al-Gaadi
ETElkamil Tola
Elkamil Tola
Abdalhaleem Abdallah HassaballaAbdalhaleem Abdallah Hassaballa
Abdalhaleem Abdallah Hassaballa
VPVirupakshagouda Patil
Virupakshagouda Patil
Accurate estimation of evapotranspiration (ET) is essential for hydrological modeling and efficient crop water management in hyper-arid climates. In this study, we applied the METRIC algorithm on Landsat-8 images, acquired from June to October 2013, for the mapping of ET of a 50 ha center-pivot irrigated alfalfa field in the eastern region of Saudi Arabia. The METRIC-estimated energy balance components and ET were evaluated against the data provided by an eddy covariance (EC) flux tower installed in the field. Results indicated that the METRIC algorithm provided accurate ET estimates over the study area, with RMSE values of 0.13 and 4.15 mm d−1. The METRIC algorithm was observed to perform better in full canopy conditions compared to partial canopy conditions. On average, the METRIC algorithm overestimated the hourly ET by 6.6 % in comparison to the EC measurements; however, the daily ET was underestimated by 4.2 %.

1 October 1995 in Plant and Soil
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CCC. P. Chandrashekara
C. P. Chandrashekara
VPVirupakshagouda Patil
Virupakshagouda Patil
MSM. N. Sreenivasa
M. N. Sreenivasa

4 February 2020
Verified
Book Chapter
Closed access
PDF file
SVShyamal Virnodkar
Shyamal Virnodkar
VPVinod K. Pachghare
Vinod K. Pachghare
VPVirupakshagouda Patil
Virupakshagouda Patil
SJSunil Kumar Jha
Sunil Kumar Jha

1 June 2022 in Journal of King Saud University Computer and Information Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SVShyamal Virnodkar
Shyamal Virnodkar
VPVinod K. Pachghare
Vinod K. Pachghare
VPVirupakshagouda Patil
Virupakshagouda Patil
SJSunil Kumar Jha
Sunil Kumar Jha

22 May 2014 in IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
VPVirupakshagouda Patil
Virupakshagouda Patil
KAKhalid A. Al-Gaadi
Khalid A. Al-Gaadi
RMRangaswamy Madugundu
Rangaswamy Madugundu
ETElkamil Tola
Elkamil Tola
SMSamy Marey
Samy Marey
PGPrasanna H. Gowda
Prasanna H. Gowda
The primary objective of this study was to assess the water productivity (WP) of the annual (wheat, barley, and corn) and biennial (alfalfa and Rhodes grass) crops cultivated under centerpivot irrigation located over desert areas of the Al-Kharj region in Saudi Arabia. The Surface Energy Balance Algorithm for Land (SEBAL) was applied to Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer (ASTER) images to obtain evapotranspiration (ET) for assessing WP and irrigation performance (IP) of crops. Crop productivity (CP) was estimated using Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) crop productivity models. The predicted CP (CPP) for corn varied from 12 690 to 14 060 kg/ha and from 6000 to 7370 kg/ha for wheat. The for alfalfa and Rhodes grass was 42 450 and 58 210 (kg/ha/year), respectively. The highest predicted WP was observed in wheat (0.80-2.01 kg/m3) and the lowest was in alfalfa (0.38-0.46 kg/m3). The deviation between SEBAL predicted ET (ETP) and weather station recorded ET (ETW) was 10%. The performance of the prediction models was assessed against the measured data. The overall mean bias/error of the predictions of CP, ET, and WP was 9.4%, , and 9.65%, respectively; the root mean square error (RMSE) was 1996 (kg/ha), 2107 (m3/ha), and 0.09 (kg/m3) for CP, ET, and WP, respectively. When CP was converted into variations between the actual and predicted, the variations were 8% to 12% for wheat, 14% to 20% for corn, 17% to 35% for alfalfa, 3% to 38% for Rhodes grass, and 4% for barley.