Yunlong Zhang

Mr. Yunlong Zhang

Harbin Institute of Technology

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

8Years (2019-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
14 August 2020 in Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YZYunlong Zhang
Yunlong Zhang
WTWang Tao
Wang Tao
YCYanbin Chen
Yanbin Chen
ZLZhenkun Lei
Zhenkun Lei
RBRuixiang Bai
Ruixiang Bai
Zhenglong LeiZhenglong Lei
Zhenglong Lei
The aim of this work was to study the buckling behavior and failure mode of the double-sided laser-welded Al–Li alloy panel structure under the effect of axial compression via experimental and numerical simulation methods. In the test, multi-frequency fringe projection profilometry was used to monitor the out-of-plane displacement of the laser-welded panel structure during the axial compression load. In addition, the in-plane deformation was precisely monitored via strain gauge and strain rosette. The basic principles of fringe projection profilometry were introduced, and how to use fringe projection profilometry to obtain out-of-plane displacement was also presented. Numerical simulations were performed using the finite element method (FEM) to predict the failure load and buckling modes of the laser-welded panel structure under axial compression, and the obtained results were compared with those of the experiment. It was found that the fringe projection profilometry method for monitoring the buckling deformation of the laser-welded structure was verified to be effective in terms of a measurement accuracy of sub-millimeter level. The structural failure was caused by local buckling of the skin. The observed failure modes such as local buckling of the skin, bending deformation of the stringers, continuous fracture of several welds, and failure of local strength and stiffness were attributed to the deformed laser-welded panel structure under the axial compression. The predicted failure load in the numerical simulation was slightly smaller than that of the experimental test, and the error of the simulation result relative to the test result was −2.7%. The difference between them might be due to the fact that the boundary and loading conditions used in the FEM model could not be completely consistent with those used in the actual experiment.

6 December 2019 in Metals
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YZYunlong Zhang
Yunlong Zhang
YCYanbin Chen
Yanbin Chen
WTWang Tao
Wang Tao
Zhenglong LeiZhenglong Lei
Zhenglong Lei
ZYZhaohui Yang
Zhaohui Yang
TNTiantian Nan
Tiantian Nan
The durable structure and robustness of T-joints in the panel materials for civil aircraft are a crucial matter of importance. In this work, the impact of the post-weld heat treatments (PWHTs) on the microstructure and mechanical properties of laser beam welded T-joints of 2060-T3/2099-T3 Al-Li alloy was analyzed. Heat-treatment of the laser beam welded T-joints was carried out in two different ways, namely, solution treatment and artificial aging (STAA) at varied duration and only artificial aging (AA) at varied duration. The microstructure and mechanical properties of the heat-treated joints were investigated using metallographic and scanning electron microscopic images, micro-hardness test, and tensile test, respectively. The results showed that, in cases of STAA, the eutectic structures on the grain boundary were partially dissolved via solution treatment (ST), and increased dispersed precipitation of the second phase in matrix resulted in significant dispersion strengthening, as well as enhanced strength and plasticity. In contrast, in the AA process, alloy elements in the matrix continued to segregate towards the grain boundary, resulting in significant grain boundary strengthening, enhanced strength, and decreased plasticity. Additionally, joint fractures were micro-porous aggregation transgranular ones in the fusion zone (FZ). The joints treated by STAA exhibited excellent plasticity compared with those treated by AA. Furthermore, the micro-hardness of welded joints treated by AA was higher than that of those treated by STAA. Indeed, the tensile strength of joints treated by STAA and AA ranged from 405 to 475 MPa, which was 81–95% of the base metal 2060-T8, though the elongation of joints treated by STAA was superior to the counterpart AA.