Jean-Sébastien Landry

Mr. Jean-Sébastien Landry


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

15Years (2012-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 May 2014 in Environmental Research Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Federico MartellozzoFederico Martellozzo
Federico Martellozzo
JLJean-Sébastien Landry
Jean-Sébastien Landry
DPD Plouffe
D Plouffe
VSV Seufert
V Seufert
PRPedram Rowhani
Pedram Rowhani
NRN Ramankutty
N Ramankutty

13 April 2016 in Biogeosciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JLJean-Sébastien Landry
Jean-Sébastien Landry
HMH. Damon Matthews
H. Damon Matthews
Non-deforestation fire – i.e., fire that is typically followed by the recovery of natural vegetation – is arguably the most influential disturbance in terrestrial ecosystems, thereby playing a major role in carbon exchanges and affecting many climatic processes. The radiative effect from a given atmospheric CO2 perturbation is the same for fire and fossil fuel combustion. However, major differences exist per unit of CO2 emitted between the effects of non-deforestation fire vs. fossil fuel combustion on the global carbon cycle and climate, because (1) fossil fuel combustion implies a net transfer of carbon from geological reservoirs to the atmospheric, oceanic, and terrestrial pools, whereas fire occurring in terrestrial ecosystems does not; (2) the average lifetime of the atmospheric CO2 increase is longer when originating from fossil fuel combustion compared to fire, due to the strong vegetation regrowth following fire disturbances in terrestrial ecosystems; and (3) other impacts, for example on land surface albedo, also differ between fire and fossil fuel combustion. The main purpose of this study is to illustrate the consequences from these fundamental differences between fossil fuel combustion and non-deforestation fires using 1000-year simulations of a coupled climate–carbon model with interactive vegetation. We assessed emissions from both pulse and stable fire regime changes, considering both the gross (carbon released from combustion) and net (fire-caused change in land carbon, also accounting for vegetation decomposition and regrowth, as well as climate–carbon feedbacks) fire CO2 emissions. In all cases, we found substantial differences from equivalent amounts of emissions produced by fossil fuel combustion. These findings suggest that side-by-side comparisons of non-deforestation fire and fossil fuel CO2 emissions – implicitly implying that they have similar effects per unit of CO2 emitted – should therefore be avoided, particularly when these comparisons involve gross fire emissions, because the reservoirs from which these emissions are drawn have very different residence times (millions of years for fossil fuel; years to centuries for vegetation and soil–litter). Our results also support the notion that most net emissions occur relatively soon after fire regime shifts and then progressively approach zero. Overall, our study calls for the explicit representation of fire activity as a valuable step to foster a more accurate understanding of its impacts on global carbon cycling and temperature, as opposed to conceiving fire effects as congruent with the consequences from fossil fuel combustion.

1 February 2018 in Environmental Research Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
APAntti-Ilari Partanen
Antti-Ilari Partanen
JLJean-Sébastien Landry
Jean-Sébastien Landry
HMH Damon Matthews
H Damon Matthews

25 January 2017 in Global Change Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JLJean-Sébastien Landry
Jean-Sébastien Landry
HMH. Damon Matthews
H. Damon Matthews

16 July 2015 in Climatic Change
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JLJean-Sébastien Landry
Jean-Sébastien Landry
HMH. Damon Matthews
H. Damon Matthews
NRNavin Ramankutty
Navin Ramankutty

1 April 2016 in Geoscientific Model Development
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JLJean-Sébastien Landry
Jean-Sébastien Landry
DPDavid T. Price
David T. Price
NRNavin Ramankutty
Navin Ramankutty
LPLael Parrott
Lael Parrott
HMH. Damon Matthews
H. Damon Matthews
Insects defoliate and kill plants in many ecosystems worldwide. The consequences of these natural processes on terrestrial ecology and nutrient cycling are well established, and their potential climatic effects resulting from modified land–atmosphere exchanges of carbon, energy, and water are increasingly being recognized. We developed a Marauding Insect Module (MIM) to quantify, in the Integrated BIosphere Simulator (IBIS), the consequences of insect activity on biogeochemical and biogeophysical fluxes, also accounting for the effects of altered vegetation dynamics. MIM can simulate damage from three different insect functional types: (1) defoliators on broadleaf deciduous trees, (2) defoliators on needleleaf evergreen trees, and (3) bark beetles on needleleaf evergreen trees, with the resulting impacts being estimated by IBIS based on the new, insect-modified state of the vegetation. MIM further accounts for the physical presence and gradual fall of insect-killed dead standing trees. The design of MIM should facilitate the addition of other insect types besides the ones already included and could guide the development of similar modules for other process-based vegetation models. After describing IBIS–MIM, we illustrate the usefulness of the model by presenting results spanning daily to centennial timescales for vegetation dynamics and cycling of carbon, energy, and water in a simplified setting and for bark beetles only. More precisely, we simulated 100 % mortality events from the mountain pine beetle for three locations in western Canada. We then show that these simulated impacts agree with many previous studies based on field measurements, satellite data, or modelling. MIM and similar tools should therefore be of great value in assessing the wide array of impacts resulting from insect-induced plant damage in the Earth system.