Reprogramming of energy metabolism is regarded as one of the hallmarks of cancer; in particular, oncogenic RAS has been shown to be a critical regulator of cancer metabolism. Recently, asparagine metabolism has been heavily investigated as a novel target for cancer treatment. For example, Knott et al. showed that asparagine bioavailability governs metastasis in a breast cancer model. Gwinn et al. reported the therapeutic vulnerability of asparagine biosynthesis in KRAS-driven non-small cell lung cancer. We previously reported that KRAS-mutated CRC cells can adapt to glutamine depletion through upregulation of asparagine synthetase (ASNS), an enzyme that synthesizes asparagine from aspartate. In our previous study, we assessed the efficacy of asparagine depletion using human cancer cell lines. In the present study, we evaluated the clinical relevance of asparagine depletion using a novel patient-derived spheroid xenograft (PDSX) mouse model. First, we examined ASNS expression in 38 spheroid lines and found that 12 lines (12/37, 32.4%) displayed high ASNS expression, whereas 26 lines (25/37, 67.6%) showed no ASNS expression. Next, to determine the role of asparagine metabolism in tumor growth, we established ASNS-knockdown spheroid lines using lentiviral short hairpin RNA constructs targeting ASNS. An in vitro cell proliferation assay demonstrated a significant decrease in cell proliferation upon asparagine depletion in the ASNS-knockdown spheroid lines, and this was not observed in the control spheroids lines. In addition, we examined asparagine inhibition with the anti-leukemia drug L-asparaginase (L-Asp) and observed a considerable reduction in cell proliferation at a low concentration (0.1 U/mL) in the ASNS-knockdown spheroid lines, whereas it exhibited limited inhibition of control spheroid lines at the same concentration. Finally, we used the PDSX model to assess the effects of asparagine depletion on tumor growth in vivo. The nude mice injected with ASNS-knockdown or control spheroid lines were administered with L-Asp once a day for 28 days. Surprisingly, in mice injected with ASNS-knockdown spheroids, the administration of L-Asp dramatically inhibited tumor engraftment. On the other hands, in mice injected with control spheroids, the administration of L-Asp had no effect on tumor growth inhibition at all. These results suggest that ASNS inhibition could be critical in targeting asparagine metabolism in cancers.

Some colorectal cancer patients harboring FGFR (fibroblast growth factor receptor) genetic alterations, such as copy number gain, mutation, and/or mRNA overexpression, were selected for enrollment in several recent clinical trials of FGFR inhibitor, because these genetic alterations were preclinically reported to be associated with FGFR inhibitor sensitivity as well as poor prognosis, invasiveness, and/or metastatic potential. However, few enrolled patients were responsive to FGFR inhibitors. Thus, practical strategies are eagerly awaited that can stratify patients for the subset that potentially responds to FGFR inhibitor chemotherapy. In the present study, we evaluated the sensitivity to FGFR inhibitor erdafitinib on 25 patient-derived tumor-initiating cell (TIC) spheroid lines carrying wild-type RAS and RAF genes, both in vitro and in vivo. Then, we assessed possible correlations between the sensitivity and the genetic/genomic data of the spheroid lines tested. Upon their exposure to erdafitinib, seven lines (7/25, 28%) responded significantly. Normal colonic epithelial stem cells were unaffected by the inhibitors. Moreover, the combination of erdafitinib with EGFR inhibitor erlotinib showed stronger growth inhibition than either drug alone, as efficacy was observed in 21 lines (84%) including 14 (56%) that were insensitive to erdafitinib alone. The in vitro erdafitinib response was accurately reflected on mouse xenografts of TIC spheroid lines. However, we found little correlation between their genetic/genomic alterations of TIC spheroids and the sensitivity to the FGFR inhibitor. Accordingly, we propose that direct testing of the patient-derived spheroids in vitro is one of the most reliable personalized methods in FGFR-inhibitor therapy of colorectal cancer patients.

A lack of caudal-type homeobox transcription factor 2 (CDX2) protein expression has been proposed as a prognostic biomarker for colorectal cancer (CRC). However, the relationship between CDX2 levels and the survival of patients with stage II/III CRC along with the relationship between microRNAs (miRs) and CDX2 expression are unclear. Tissue samples were collected from patients with stage II/III CRC surgically treated at Kyoto University Hospital. CDX2 expression was semi-quantitatively evaluated by immunohistochemistry (IHC). The prognostic impacts of CDX2 expression on overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) were evaluated by multivariable statistical analysis. The expression of miRs regulating CDX2 expression and their prognostic impacts were analyzed using The Cancer Genome Atlas Program for CRC (TCGA-CRC). Eleven of 174 CRC tissues lacked CDX2 expression. The five-year OS and RFS rates of patients with CDX2-negative CRC were significantly lower than those of CDX2-positive patients. Multivariate analysis of clinicopathological features revealed that CDX2-negative status is an independent marker of poor prognosis in stage II/III CRC. miR-9-5p was shown to regulate CDX2 expression. TCGA-CRC analysis showed that high miR-9-5p expression was significantly associated with poor patient prognosis in stage II/III CRC. In conclusion, CDX2, the post-transcriptional target of microRNA-9-5p, is a useful prognostic biomarker in patients with stage II/III CRC.

Experimental techniques for patient‐derived cancer stem‐cell organoids/spheroids can be powerful diagnostic tools for personalized chemotherapy. However, establishing their cultures from gastric cancer remains challenging due to low culture efficiency and cumbersome methods. To propagate gastric cancer cells as highly proliferative stem‐cell spheroids in vitro, we initially used a similar method to that for colorectal cancer stem cells, which, unfortunately, resulted in a low success rate (25%, 18 of 71 cases). We scrutinized the protocol and found that the unsuccessful cases were largely caused by the paucity of cancer stem cells in the sampled tissues as well as insufficient culture media. To overcome these obstacles, we extensively revised our sample collection protocol and culture conditions. We then investigated the following second cohort and, consequently, achieved a significantly higher success rate (88%, 29 of 33 cases). One of the key improvements included new sampling procedures for tumor tissues from wider and deeper areas of gastric cancer specimens, which allowed securing cancer stem cells more reproducibly. Additionally, we embedded tumor epithelial pieces separately in both Matrigel and collagen type‐I as their preference to the extracellular matrix was different depending on the tumors. We also added a low concentration of Wnt ligands to the culture, which helped the growth of occasional Wnt‐responsive gastric cancer stem‐cell spheroids without allowing proliferation of the normal gastric epithelial stem cells. This newly improved spheroid culture method may facilitate further studies, including personalized drug‐sensitivity tests prior to drug therapy.