Some cultivars of Pyrus communis develop mature fruit with a distinctive red blush. Investigating the patterns of pear colour development in response to sunlight has implications for orchard management of these pears. The objectives of these experiments are to study the seasonal patterns of colour development and investigate the influence of shade and sunlight exposure on the red colour and harvest quality of blush pears “ANP-0118” and “ANP-0131”. Several long, medium and short shading treatments were applied at different stages of fruit development from 28 (“ANP-0131”) and 29 (“ANP-0118”) days after full bloom (DAFB) until harvests at 119 DAFB (“ANP-0118”) and 175 DAFB (“ANP-0131”). Fruits were measured every three weeks for colour parameters (a*, hue angle, chroma) and at harvest for quality parameters (fresh weight, visual assessments of percentage blush coverage and blush intensity, flesh firmness and soluble solids concentration). In the unshaded control, red colour increased during the growing season (increase in a* value and decrease in hue angle), as well as increasing in chroma value. Periods of shading during the season negatively affected red colour in both cultivars, as evidenced by significant decreases in a* value and increases in hue angle. Shaded fruits that were subsequently re-exposed to sunlight reacted with a dynamic increase in a* value and decrease in hue angle. Fruit shaded for the length of the experiment or prior to harvest had significantly lower a* values than the control at harvest. Visual assessment at harvest of percentage blush coverage and blush intensity were significantly affected by shading in both cultivars. Shading treatments applied early in the experiment had a negative effect on the fresh fruit weight of “ANP-0118”.
The aims of this study were to investigate the sunlight requirements during floral initiation and differentiation for the development of flower buds in ‘Autumn Bright’ nectarine and to explore its source–sink relationship. In early January 2019 (111 days after full bloom), prior to floral initiation and differentiation, 12 new shoots were tagged on 14 trees, with four shoots in each of the low (0–1.2 m), middle (1.2–2.0 m), and high (>2.0 m) canopy heights. Three treatments (bud shading; leaf pluck; bud shading and leaf pluck) were applied to three shoots in each canopy height on the fourth and eighth bud, in addition to a fourth control shoot. Light penetration was measured at the different canopy heights. Buds were assessed in Spring for floral transition, number of floral buds per node, and fruit set. The treatments at the node level had no effect on floral initiation, indicating that sink strength was not promoted by additional light. Light penetration decreased with decreasing canopy height and corresponded with lower floral buds in the low zone. Fruit set was uninfluenced by all treatments. The results of this study emphasised the importance of the availability of photosynthetic assimilates for floral initiation in peach and nectarine trees. Balanced crop load management and summer pruning to enhance canopy sunlight distribution would increase the availability of nutrients for improved floral transition in this cultivar.
This study aimed to evaluate the effects of fruit position, light exposure and fruit surface temperature (FST) on apple fruit colour development and fruit quality at harvest, including sunburn damage severity. This was achieved by undertaking two experiments in a high-density planting of the dark-red apple ANABP 01 in Tatura, Australia. In the 2020–2021 growing season an experiment was conducted to draw relationships between fruit position and fruit quality parameters. Here, sample fruit position and level of light exposure were respectively determined using a static LiDAR system and a portable quantum photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) sensor. At harvest the sample fruit were analysed for percentage red colour coverage, objective colour parameters (L*, a*, b*, hue angle and chroma), sunburn damage, fruit diameter (FD), soluble solids concentration (SSC), flesh firmness (FF) and starch pattern index (SPI). A second experiment was conducted in the 2021–2022 growing season and focused on how fruit shading, light exposure and the removal of ultraviolet (UV) radiation affected the FST, colour development and harvest fruit quality. Five treatments were distributed among sample fruit: fully shaded with aluminium umbrellas, shaded for one month and then exposed to sunlight until harvest, exposed for one month and then shaded until harvest, covered with a longpass UV filter and a control treatment. The development of colour in this dark-red apple cultivar was highly responsive to aspects of fruit position, and the intensity and quality of light exposure. The best-coloured fruit were exposed to higher quantities of PAR, exposed to both PAR and UV radiation simultaneously and located higher in the tree canopy. Fruit that were fully exposed to PAR and achieved better colour development also displayed higher FST and sunburn damage severity.