Patrick Mullie

Patrick Mullie


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

24Years (2003-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2014 in The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PAPhilippe Autier
Philippe Autier
MBMathieu Boniol
Mathieu Boniol
CPCécile Pizot
Cécile Pizot
PMPatrick Mullie
Patrick Mullie

24 March 2014 in Nutrients
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PCPeter Clarys
Peter Clarys
TDTom Deliens
Tom Deliens
Inge HuybrechtsInge Huybrechts
Inge Huybrechts
PDPeter Deriemaeker
Peter Deriemaeker
BVBarbara Vanaelst
Barbara Vanaelst
PMPatrick Mullie
Patrick Mullie
The number of studies comparing nutritional quality of restrictive diets is limited. Data on vegan subjects are especially lacking. It was the aim of the present study to compare the quality and the contributing components of vegan, vegetarian, semi-vegetarian, pesco-vegetarian and omnivorous diets. Dietary intake was estimated using a cross-sectional online survey with a 52-items food frequency questionnaire (FFQ). Healthy Eating Index 2010 (HEI-2010) and the Mediterranean Diet Score (MDS) were calculated as indicators for diet quality. After analysis of the diet questionnaire and the FFQ, 1475 participants were classified as vegans (n = 104), vegetarians (n = 573), semi-vegetarians (n = 498), pesco-vegetarians (n = 145), and omnivores (n = 155). The most restricted diet, i.e., the vegan diet, had the lowest total energy intake, better fat intake profile, lowest protein and highest dietary fiber intake in contrast to the omnivorous diet. Calcium intake was lowest for the vegans and below national dietary recommendations. The vegan diet received the highest index values and the omnivorous the lowest for HEI-2010 and MDS. Typical aspects of a vegan diet (high fruit and vegetable intake, low sodium intake, and low intake of saturated fat) contributed substantially to the total score, independent of the indexing system used. The score for the more prudent diets (vegetarians, semi-vegetarians and pesco-vegetarians) differed as a function of the used indexing system but they were mostly better in terms of nutrient quality than the omnivores.

28 January 2011 in International Journal of Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Sara GandiniSara Gandini
Sara Gandini
MBMathieu Boniol
Mathieu Boniol
JHJari Haukka
Jari Haukka
GBGraham Byrnes
Graham Byrnes
BCBrian Cox
Brian Cox
PAPhilippe Autier
Philippe Autier

20 September 2012 in British Journal of Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PBP Boyle
P Boyle
MBM Boniol
M Boniol
AKA Koechlin
A Koechlin
CRC Robertson
C Robertson
FVF Valentini
F Valentini
PAP Autier
P Autier
The potential of an increased risk of breast cancer in women with diabetes has been the subject of a great deal of recent research. A meta-analysis was undertaken using a random effects model to investigate the association between diabetes and breast cancer risk. Thirty-nine independent risk estimates were available from observational epidemiological studies. The summary relative risk (SRR) for breast cancer in women with diabetes was 1.27 (95% confidence interval (CI), 1.16–1.39) with no evidence of publication bias. Prospective studies showed a lower risk (SRR 1.23 (95% CI, 1.12–1.35)) than retrospective studies (SRR 1.36 (95% CI, 1.13–1.63)). Type 1 diabetes, or diabetes in pre-menopausal women, were not associated with risk of breast cancer (SRR 1.00 (95% CI, 0.74–1.35) and SRR 0.86 (95% CI, 0.66–1.12), respectively). Studies adjusting for body mass index (BMI) showed lower estimates (SRR 1.16 (95% CI, 1.08–1.24)) as compared with those studies that were not adjusted for BMI (SRR 1.33 (95% CI, 1.18–1.51)). The risk of breast cancer in women with type 2 diabetes is increased by 27%, a figure that decreased to 16% after adjustment for BMI. No increased risk was seen for women at pre-menopausal ages or with type 1 diabetes.

1 December 2017 in The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PAPhilippe Autier
Philippe Autier
PMPatrick Mullie
Patrick Mullie
AMAlina Macacu
Alina Macacu
MDMiruna Dragomir
Miruna Dragomir
MBMagali Boniol
Magali Boniol
MBMathieu Boniol
Mathieu Boniol

1 February 2010 in The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
IGIsabelle Guelinckx
Isabelle Guelinckx
RDRoland Devlieger
Roland Devlieger
PMPatrick Mullie
Patrick Mullie
GVGreet Vansant
Greet Vansant
Background: Maternal obesity and excessive gestational weight gain (GWG) are major short- and long-term risk factors for maternal and fetal complications.