Zhenqing Zhang

Zhenqing Zhang


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

13Years (2014-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 August 2018 in Carbohydrate Polymers
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ZLZhonghua Liu
Zhonghua Liu
YXYuanjing Xiong
Yuanjing Xiong
LYLin Yi
Lin Yi
RDRujuan Dai
Rujuan Dai
YWYanxin Wang
Yanxin Wang
SYSheng Yuan
Sheng Yuan

1 August 2016 in Carbohydrate Polymers
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JHJie Hao
Jie Hao
JLJiaojiao Lu
Jiaojiao Lu
NXNaiyu Xu
Naiyu Xu
RLRobert J. Linhardt
Robert J. Linhardt
ZZZhenqing Zhang
Zhenqing Zhang

1 May 2015 in Carbohydrate Polymers
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JLJiaojiao Lu
Jiaojiao Lu
HYHai Yang
Hai Yang
JHJie Hao
Jie Hao
CWChengling Wu
Chengling Wu
LLLi Liu
Li Liu
ZZZhenqing Zhang
Zhenqing Zhang

11 May 2023 in Carbohydrate Polymers
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TZTingting Zhao
Tingting Zhao
HYHan Yue
Han Yue
JPJunfeng Peng
Junfeng Peng
YNYingmin Nie
Yingmin Nie
LWLongzhen Wu
Longzhen Wu
KDKan Ding
Kan Ding

1 February 2017 in Carbohydrate Polymers
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LTLei Tao
Lei Tao
FSFei Song
Fei Song
NXNaiyu Xu
Naiyu Xu
DLDuxin Li
Duxin Li
RLRobert J. Linhardt
Robert J. Linhardt
ZZZhenqing Zhang
Zhenqing Zhang

23 January 2018 in Glycobiology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
WYwang yanxin
wang yanxin
XNXin Niu
Xin Niu
XGXiaoli Guo
Xiaoli Guo
YHYu Han
Yu Han
ZLZhonghua Liu
Zhonghua Liu
SYSheng Yuan
Sheng Yuan
Two chitin deacetylases, Cda1 and Cda2, from Coprinopsis cinerea were expressed and characterized. Cda1 preferably deacetylates the nonreducing end residue of (GlcNAc)2, the internal or nonreducing end residue of (GlcNAc)3 and the nonreducing residue of (GlcNAc)6 after deacetylating the internal residues. In contrast, Cda2 preferably deacetylates the reducing end residue of (GlcNAc)2, the internal or reducing end residue of (GlcNAc)3 and the reducing residue of (GlcNAc)6 after deacetylating the internal residues. Furthermore, Cda1 prefers chitohexaose with higher degrees of acetylation for deacetylation, while Cda2 shows a weaker preference for chitohexaose with varying degrees of acetylation. The predicted Cda1 structure shows more hydrophobic aromatic amino acids on the surface near subsite +1 in the active site than on the surface near subsite −1, whereas the predicted Cda2 structure has more hydrophobic aromatic amino acids on the surface near subsite −1 than on the surface near subsite +1, which may be the molecular basis of the distinctive catalytic features between Cda1 and Cda2. Notably, Cda1 has a high transcription level in the nonelongating basal stipe region, whereas Cda2 has a high transcription level in the elongating apical stipe region, and the transcription level of the former is approximately five times that of the latter. Correspondingly, the molar ratio of GlcN/GlcNAc increased from 0.15 in the cell wall of the apical stipe region to 0.22 in the cell wall of the basal stipe region. Different modes of action of Cda1 and Cda2 may be related to their functions in the different stipe regions.