Silvia Pianigiani

Mrs. Silvia Pianigiani


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

16Years (2011-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 December 2016 in The Journal of Arthroplasty
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Bernardo InnocentiBernardo Innocenti
Bernardo Innocenti
SPSilvia Pianigiani
Silvia Pianigiani
GRGaetano Ramundo
Gaetano Ramundo
ETEmmanuel Thienpont
Emmanuel Thienpont

1 May 2011 in Journal of Biomechanics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Bernardo InnocentiBernardo Innocenti
Bernardo Innocenti
SPSilvia Pianigiani
Silvia Pianigiani
LLLuc Labey
Luc Labey
JVJan Victor
Jan Victor
JBJohan Bellemans
Johan Bellemans

10 May 2015 in Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JBJean Brihault
Jean Brihault
ANAlessandro Navacchia
Alessandro Navacchia
SPSilvia Pianigiani
Silvia Pianigiani
LLLuc Labey
Luc Labey
RCRonny De Corte
Ronny De Corte
Bernardo InnocentiBernardo Innocenti
Bernardo Innocenti

1 August 2012 in Journal of Biomechanics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SPSilvia Pianigiani
Silvia Pianigiani
YCYan Chevalier
Yan Chevalier
LLLuc Labey
Luc Labey
VPValerio Pascale
Valerio Pascale
Bernardo InnocentiBernardo Innocenti
Bernardo Innocenti

20 August 2018 in Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Bernardo InnocentiBernardo Innocenti
Bernardo Innocenti
Gusztáv FeketeGusztáv Fekete
Gusztáv Fekete
SPSilvia Pianigiani
Silvia Pianigiani
Augments are a common solution for treating bone loss in revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and industry is providing to surgeons several options, in terms of material, thickness, and shapes. Actually, while the choice of the shape and the thickness is mainly dictated by the bone defect, no proper guidelines are currently available to select the optimal material for a specific clinical situation. Nevertheless, different materials could induce different bone responses and, later, potentially compromise implant stability and performances. Therefore, in this study, a biomechanical analysis is performed by means of finite element modeling about existing features for augment designs. Based upon a review of available products at present, the following augments features were analyzed: position (distal/proximal and posterior), thickness (5, 10, and 15 mm), and material (bone cement, porous metal, and solid metal). For all analyzed configurations, bone stresses were investigated in different regions and compared among all configurations and the control model for which no augments were used. Results show that the use of any kind of augment usually induces a change in bone stresses, especially in the region close to the bone cut. The porous metal presents result very close to cement ones; thus, it could be considered as a good alternative for defects of any size. Solid metal has the least satisfying results inducing the highest changes in bone stress. The results of this study demonstrate that material stiffness of the augment should be as close as possible to bone properties for allowing the best implant performances.

30 August 2016 in Journal of Orthopaedic Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CBClaudio Belvedere
Claudio Belvedere
Alberto LeardiniAlberto Leardini
Alberto Leardini
FCFabio Catani
Fabio Catani
SPSilvia Pianigiani
Silvia Pianigiani
Bernardo InnocentiBernardo Innocenti
Bernardo Innocenti
In total knee replacement, the investigation on the exact contact patterns at the post‐cam in implanted patients from real in vivo data during daily living activities is fundamental for validating implant design concepts and assessing relevant performances. This study is aimed at verifying the restoration of natural tibio‐femoral condylar kinematics by investigating the post‐cam engagement at different motor tasks. An innovative validated technique, combining three‐dimensional fluoroscopic and finite element analyses, was applied to measure joint kinematics during daily living activities in 15 patients implanted with guided motion posterior‐stabilized total knee replacement. Motion results showed physiological antero‐posterior translations of the tibio‐femoral condyles for every motor task. However, high variability was observed in the position of the calculated pivot point among different patients and different motor tasks, as well as in the range of post‐cam engagement. Physiological tibio‐femoral joint rotations and contacts at the condyles were found restored in the present knee replacement. Articular contact patterns experienced at the post‐cam were found compatible with this original prosthesis design. The present study reports replaced knee kinematics also in terms of articular surface contacts, both at the condyles and, for the first time, at the post‐cam. © 2016 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 35:1396–1403, 2017.