Assessing Erb-b2 receptor tyrosine kinase 2 (ERBB2) amplification status in breast and gastric cancer is necessary for deciding the best therapeutic strategy. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) are currently used for assessing protein levels and gene copy number (CN), respectively. The use of next-generation sequencing (NGS) to measure ERBB2 CN in breast cancer is approved by the United States Federal Drug Administration as a companion diagnostic. However, a CN of less than 8 is evaluated as “equivocal”, which means that some ERBB2 amplification cases diagnosed as “HER2 negative” might be false-negative cases. We reviewed the results of gene profiling targeting 160 cancer-related genes in breast (N = 90) and non-breast (N = 19) cancer tissue, and compared the ERBB2 CN results with the IHC/FISH scores. We obtained an estimated CN from the measured CN by factoring in the histological proportion of tumor cells and found that an ERBB2-estimated CN of 3.2 or higher was concordant with the combined IHC/FISH outcome in 98.4% (88/90) of breast cancer cases, while this was not always evident among non-breast cancer cases. Therefore, NGS-estimated ERBB2 CN could be considered a diagnostic test for anti-HER2 therapy after the completion of adequate prospective clinical trials.

Reconstitution of high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma from primary fallopian tube secretory epithelial cells Reconstitution of high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma from primary fallopian tube secretory epithelial cells

Tumor sensitivity to platinum (Pt)‐based chemotherapy and poly(adenosine diphosphate ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors is increased by homologous recombination deficiency‐causing mutations; in particular, reversion mutations cause drug resistance by restoring protein function. Treatment response is predicted by breast cancer susceptibility gene 1/2 (BRCA1/2) mutations; however, BRCA1/2 reversion mutations have not been comprehensively studied in pan‐cancer cohorts. We aimed to characterize BRCA1/2 reversion mutations in a large pan‐cancer cohort of Japanese patients by retrospectively analyzing sequencing data for BRCA1/2 pathogenic/likely pathogenic mutations in 3738 patients with 32 cancer types. We identified somatic mutations in tumors or circulating cell‐free DNA that could restore the ORF of adverse alleles, including reversion mutations. We identified 12 (0.32%) patients with somatic BRCA1 (n = 3) and BRCA2 (n = 9) reversion mutations in breast (n = 4), ovarian/fallopian tube/peritoneal (n = 4), pancreatic (n = 2), prostate (n = 1), and gallbladder (n = 1) cancers. We identified 21 reversion events—BRCA1 (n = 3), BRCA2 (n = 18)—including eight pure deletions, one single‐nucleotide variant, six multinucleotide variants, and six deletion–insertions. Seven (33.3%) reversion deletions showed a microhomology length greater than 1 bp, suggesting microhomology‐mediated end‐join repair. Disease course data were obtained for all patients with reversion events: four patients acquired mutations after PARP‐inhibitor treatment failure, two showed somatic reversion mutations after disease progression, following Pt‐based treatment, five showed mutations after both treatments, one patient with pancreatic cancer and BRCA1 reversion mutations had no history of either treatment. Although reversion mutations commonly occur in BRCA‐associated cancers, our findings suggest that reversion mutations due to Pt‐chemotherapy might be correlated with BRCA1/2‐mediated tumorigenesis even in non‐BRCA‐associated histologies.

Precision medicine, which includes comprehensive genome sequencing, is a potential therapeutic option for treating high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC). However, HGSC is a heterogeneous tumor at the architectural, cellular, and molecular levels. Intratumoral molecular heterogeneity currently limits the precision of medical strategies based on the gene mutation status. This study was carried out to analyze the presence of 160 cancer-related genetic alterations in three tissue regions with different pathological features in a patient with HGSC. The patient exhibited histological heterogeneous features with different degrees of large atypical cells and desmoplastic reactions. TP53 mutation, ERBB2 and KRAS amplification, and WT1, CDH1, and KDM6A loss were detected as actionable gene alterations. Interestingly, the ERBB2 and KRAS amplification status gradually changed according to the region examined. The difference was consistent with the differences in pathological features. Our results demonstrate the need for sampling of the appropriate tissue region showing progression of pathological features for molecular analysis to solve issues related to tumor heterogeneity prior to developing precision oncology strategies.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy has been successfully applied to various cancers; however, not all patients respond to ICI therapy. Tumors with an immune‐activated environment are highly responsive to ICIs. To identify the cells and molecules essential to the formation of an immune‐activated cancer microenvironment, we focused on the tertiary lymphoid structure (TLS) and performed histological and genomic analyses using endometrial cancer material. In the high immunogenic group, numerous TLSs were observed, and CXCL9 and CXCL13 expression was markedly increased. CXCL9‐positive antigen‐presenting and CXCL13‐positive follicular dendritic cells were distributed in the T‐ and B‐cell zones of TLSs, respectively. A group of molecules whose expression was upregulated along with CXCL9 and CXCL13 expression was strongly associated with cellular immunity. These results suggest that CXCL9‐expressing antigen‐presenting cells and CXCL13‐expressing follicular dendritic cells coordinately shape the immune‐activated microenvironment through TLS formation. The current findings will contribute to a better understanding of the mechanisms underlying the activated cancer immune microenvironment, thereby advancing the field of precision cancer medicine.