Background: Because of the increasing 5-year survival rate of breast cancer, adjustment to breast cancer survivorship is pertinent to the patient's life after diagnosis. Despite the psychological changes occurring during the transitional period (first 5 years after diagnosis) and after primary therapy having a known, critical effect on survivorship status, the data related to this topic are very limited. Purpose: This study was designed to examine the relationships among demoralization, stress, sleep disturbance, and psychological well-being in women with breast cancer after primary therapy. Methods: Two hundred eight women with breast cancer (mean age = 51.96 ± 8.27) participated in a cross-sectional study in central Taiwan. Recruitment was conducted using convenience snowball sampling at a local teaching hospital. All of the participants had completed primary therapy and were in the 5-year postdiagnosis period. The average duration of cancer was 28 months. The participants completed the Stress of Breast Cancer after Primary Therapy Scale, Demoralization Scale, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Inventory, and Ryff's Psychological Well-Being Scale–Short Form. Data were analyzed using a structural equation model to find plausible path relationships among stress, demoralization, sleep disturbances, and psychological well-being. Results: Demoralization was shown to completely mediate the effect of stress on sleep disturbances. In addition, the predictive effect of sleep disturbances on psychological well-being was overwhelmingly explained by demoralization when competing with sleep disturbances. Furthermore, a positive path was found between stress and psychological well-being because of the suppression effect of demoralization. Conclusions/Implications for Practice: Demoralization was found to be a mediator that suppressed the relationships among stress, sleep disturbances, and psychological well-being in the adaptation process of patients with breast cancer after primary therapy. This article adds to the limited research on women with breast cancer after primary therapy who are in their initial 5 years of diagnosis. In addition, this study used structural equation model to find the plausible path relationships among the psychological factors involved in the well-being of women with breast cancer. Supporting patients with cancer and effectively reducing their perceived demoralization will be key to transforming stress into personal growth and a facilitator of long-term recovery.

The aim of this study was to confirm post-traumatic growth with respect to the psychological well-being of women with breast cancer compared to women without disease. Propensity score was used to match the two groups according to age, religious beliefs, education level, monthly income, and marital status. A psychological well-being scale with six factors was used, including positive relations with others (PR), autonomy (AU), environmental mastery (EM), personal growth (PG), purpose in life (PL), and self-acceptance (SA). A total 178 women with vs. 178 women without breast cancer were compared by matching with propensity scores, using factorial invariance tests to reduce measurement errors. The results showed that women with breast cancer had significantly higher psychological well-being for all the six factors (Δχ² = 37.37, p < 0.001) and higher variability in terms of PR, AU, and PL than women without breast cancer (Δχ² = 45.94, p < 0.001). Furthermore, women with breast cancer exhibited a significantly higher association between PG and PL and a significantly lower association between PG and EM than women without breast cancer (Δχ² = 44.49, p < 0.001). This implies that psychological well-being could assess broader and more subtle post-traumatic growth in women with breast cancer and that growth was more associated with internal life value than with external environmental control.

Background/Objectives: Pain resilience (PR) may be associated with different coping skills, resulting in differences in pain outcomes. This study aimed to understand the role of PR in dictating the choice of coping methods. Methods: This study completed a preliminary validation of the Mandarin Chinese version of the Pain Resilience Scale (PRS-C) with online survey data (n = 46). Further, we conducted interviews with individuals with chronic low back pain (n = 24). Results: The PRS-C psychometric properties were assessed using a confirmatory factor analysis. The interviews explored pain history, treatment experiences, and coping strategies and were analyzed thematically. The validated PRS-C (10 items) demonstrated satisfactory psychometric properties. The interview results showed that participants who scored lower were more likely to adopt disengagement rather than engagement coping strategies. Qualitative data revealed three themes explaining why and how participants in this collectivist social framework chose their coping methods. Conclusions: The findings suggest that while participants tried to understand their pain and treatment experiences, the cognitive appraisal construct in PR influenced some of the coping experiences. However, deeply influenced by Confucianism and Buddhism, participants also expressed factors beyond the scope of individual fortitudes, such as the relationship with a higher power that significantly influenced their coping behaviors.

Objectives: Resilience to pain is a protective factor against aversive pain outcomes, such as suicide. Religiosity as a cornerstone of resilience has been found to be associated with reduced risk of suicidality in chronic pain. However, affiliations to different religions have displayed differences in suicide risk. This study focuses on the roles of pain resilience and Dao religion in mitigating suicidal experience in individuals with chronic pain. Methods: This study adopted a mixed‐method approach. A preliminary investigation was conducted regarding the internal consistency and construct validity of the translated version of the pain resilience scale (PRS). Qualitative data were collected through interviews with individuals experiencing chronic pain. Levels of PRS and gender were included in the logistic regression on the probability of suicide attempts. The role of Dao practice was qualitatively analyzed through narrative analysis. Results: Among the 24 participants, 14 were affiliated with the Dao religion; therefore, the transcripts of these 14 interviews were analyzed. Individuals with moderate scores on the PRS were 11.60 times less likely to have attempted suicide than those with low PRS scores. The likelihood further decreased by 38.7 times in those with high PRS scores. Four themes emerged from the qualitative interviews. The participants experienced a burden from pain, made efforts to please the deities in exchange for better pain control, continuously adjusted to pain, and ultimately developed a new perspective on the relationship between their religion and pain. Many individuals have engaged in Dao rituals to try to alleviate their physical and psychological pain. Most participants tended to offer a religious interpretation of enlightening moments after surviving a suicide attempt. Discussion: This study illustrates how pain resilience and Dao religious practices mitigate suicidality in chronic pain. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05148364.