This is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Elsevier via the DOI in this record.The Early Permian Variscan Cornubian Batholith is a peraluminous, composite pluton intruded into Devonian and Carboniferous metamorphosed sedimentary and volcanic rocks. Within the batholith there are: G1 (two-mica), G2 (muscovite), G3 (biotite), G4 (tourmaline) and G5 (topaz) granites. G1-G2 and G3-G4 are derived from greywacke sources and linked through fractionation of assemblages dominated by feldspars and biotite, with minor mantle involvement in G3. G5 formed though flux-induced biotite-dominate melting in the lower crust during granulite facies metamorphism. Fractionation enriched G2 granites in Li (average 315 ppm), Be (12 ppm), Ta (4.4 ppm), In (74 ppb), Sn (18 ppm) and W (12 ppm) relative to crustal abundances and G1 granites. Gallium (24 ppm), Nb (16 ppm) and Bi (0.46 ppm) are not significantly enriched during fractionation, implying they are more compatible in the fractionating assemblage. Sb (0.16 ppm) is depleted in G1-G2 relative to the average upper and lower continental crust. Muscovite, a late-stage magmatic/subsolidus mineral, is the major host of Li, Nb, In, Sn and W in G2 granites. G2 granites are spatially associated with W-Sn greisen mineralisation.\ud \ud Fractionation within the younger G3-G4 granite system enriched Li (average 364 ppm), Ga (28 ppm), In (80 ppb), Sn (14 ppm), Nb (27 ppm), Ta (4.6 ppm), W (6.3 ppm) and Bi (0.61 ppm) in the G4 granites with retention of Be in G3 granites due to partitioning of Be into cordierite during fractionation. The distribution of Nb and Ta is controlled by accessory phases such as rutile within the G4 granites, facilitated by high F and lowering the melt temperature, leading to disseminated Nb and Ta mineralisation. Lithium, In, Sn and W are hosted in biotite micas which may prove favourable for breakdown on ingress of hydrothermal fluids. Higher degrees of scattering on trace element plots may be attributable to fluid–rock interactions or variability within the magma chamber. The G3-G4 system is more boron-rich, evidenced by a higher modal abundance of tourmaline. In this system, there is a stronger increase of Sn compared to G1-G2 granites, implying Sn in tourmaline-dominated mineral lodes may represent exsolution from G4 granites.\ud \ud G1-G4 granite abundances can be accounted for by 20–30% partial melting and 10–40% fractionation of a greywacke source. G5 granites are analogues of Rare Metal Granites described in France and Germany. These granites are enriched in Li (average 1363 ppm), Ga (38 ppm), Sn (21 ppm), W (24 ppm), Nb (52 ppm) and Ta (15 ppm). Within G5 granites, the metals partition into accessory minerals such as rutile, columbite-tantalite and cassiterite, forming disseminated magmatic mineralisation. High observed concentrations of Li, In, Sn, W, Nb and Ta in G4 and G5 granites are likely facilitated by high F, Li and P, which lower melt temperature and promote retention of these elements in the melt, prior to crystallisation of disseminated magmatic mineralisation.This study was supported by the European Regional Development Fund and European Social Fund as part of the convergence funding for Cornwall and the Isles of Scilly supporting a PhD for BS (Combined Universities in Cornwall project number11200NCO5) and the European Union (Horizon 2020 project 641650 FAME). The LA-ICP-MS work was supported by a grant from the Natural Environment Research Council (NERC, NE/L001896/1). The Cornwall Heritage Trust are thanked for providing additional funds for analysis. The Natural History Museum, London, UK are thanked for loan of samples from collection BM.2004,P14, specimen numbers 1, 7, 8, 10, 21, 23, 24, 30 and 31 and thin sections P11849, P11851, P11864, P12400 and P12399. Samples GG6, GG15, GG28, and GG44 from the study of Darbyshire and Shepherd (1994) came from Peter Floyd, University of Keele. Steve Pendray, Sharon Uren and Joe Pickles assisted with the sample preparation and analysis at Camborne School of Mines. Sam Hammond assisted with LA-ICP-MS analysis at the Open University. De Lank, Carnsew and Castle-an-Dinas quarries, Richard Scrivener, Nick LeBoutillier and Ben Thompson (Imerys) are thanked for help with sampling. Karel Breiter and one anonymous reviewer are thanked for their generous and constructive comments which have helped to improve the manuscript

The provenance of synorogenic greywackes from Devonian flysch successions occupying structurally similar positions at opposite ends of the Rhenohercynian zone in SW England and Germany is evaluated. Greywackes from both regions are petrographically and chemically similar, although minor differences are seen in the relative proportions of lithics; the Gramscatho group being richer in volcanic and metavolcanic clasts, whereas the Giessen group is richer in metasedimentary clasts. Absolute abundances of Ni-Cr-V and Zr-Hf-Y vary to a limited extent in each group and reflect variable mafic detritus and heavy mineral inputs respectively. Framework mode parameters and chemical data indicate the Rhenohercynian greywackes were derived mainly from a calc-alkali, acidic, dissected continental arc source, with minor MORB-like and argillaceous metasedimentary components. Upper continental crust-normalized multi-element patterns for the greywackes are characteristic of the continental arc/active margin tectonic environment. However, ‘Mid-Proterozoic’ model Nd ages for the Gramscatho greywackes suggest that an active Devonian arc source is unlikely. Instead the range of chemical and isotopic composition displayed mainly reflects mixing between acidic arc terranes of Proterozoic age and Devonian (Lizard-type) oceanic crust. Petrographic and geochemical discrimination diagrams alone cannot resolve the temporal decoupling between source and basin and may lead to an erroneous interpretation of tectonic setting.

The SW England Rhenohercynian passive margin initiated with rift-related non-marine sedimentation and bimodal magmatism (Late Lockhovian). Continued lithospheric extension resulted in the exhumation of mantle peridotites and limited seafloor spreading (Emsian-Eifelian). Variscan convergence commenced during the Late Eifelian and was coeval with rifting further north. Collision was marked by the Early Carboniferous emergence of deep marine sedimentary/volcanic rocks from the distal continental margin, oceanic lithosphere, pre-rift basement and upper plate gneisses (correlated with the Mid-German Crystalline High of the Saxothuringian Zone). Progressive inversion of the passive margin was strongly influenced by rift basin geometry. Convergence ceased in the Late Carboniferous and was replaced by an extensional regime that reactivated basin controlling/thrust faults and reorientated earlier fabrics (Start-Perranporth Zone). The resultant exhumation of the lower plate was accompanied by emplacement of the Early Permian SW England granites and was contemporaneous with upper plate sedimentary basin formation above the reactivated Rhenohercynian suture. The Rhenohercynian passive margin probably developed in a marginal basin north of the Rheic Ocean or, possibly, a successor basin following its closure. The Lizard ophiolite is unlikely to represent Rheic Ocean floor or associated forearc (SSZ) crust. The Rheic and Rhenohercynian sutures may be coincident or the Rheic suture may be located further south in the Léon Domain.