Aim: To evaluate the incidence and risk of cardiac toxicities associated with panitumumab in advanced cancer of Caucasian patients. Materials & methods: The incidence of cardiac toxicity was assess...

Background This was a single institute, phase I/II study of salvage chemoradiotherapy (CRT) with simultaneous integrated boost in patients with mediastinal lymph node (LN) recurrence after esophagectomy. Methods Patients who presented with a clinical diagnosis of ≤5 mediastinal LN recurrence received three consecutive levels of radiotherapy dose for the recurrences. Level 1: 58.8 Gy/2.1 Gy/28 fractions, Level 2: 64.4 Gy/2.3 Gy/28 fractions and Level 3: 70 Gy/2.5 Gy/28 fractions. Results A total of 17 patients (10 patients in phase I and 7 patients in phase II) were enrolled in the present study between June 2019 and July 2020. The median duration from surgery to initial recurrence was four months (range: 3–43 months). The most common site of recurrence according to JES was 106recR, accounting for 35%. Dose‐limiting toxicity was not observed during three‐month follow‐up after completion of irradiation. The most common hematological toxicities were leukocytopenia and anemia. The most common nonhematological toxicity was esophagitis. The ORR according to RECIST was 58.8% (CR: seven patients; PR: three patients). With a median follow‐up of 15 months (95% CI: 7–16 months), all patients were still alive. Among them, two patients who received a level 1 dose and one patient who received a level III dose developed multiple lung metastases after salvage CRT, and another patient who received a level 1 dose developed an out‐of‐field recurrence in the left cervical lymph node area. Another patient who received a level III dose developed chest wall recurrence after salvage CRT. Conclusions The regimen of salvage CRT using the simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) technique (70 Gy/2.5 Gy/28F) for mediastinal lymph node recurrence in ESCC patients after esophagectomy is feasible and well tolerated.

Purpose: We sought to explore the role of nomogram-combined biomarkers, mammographic microcalcification and inflammatory hematologic markers in guiding local therapy decisions in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) subgroups with different ipsilateral breast tumour recurrence (IBTR) risk. Methods: Between January 2009 and December 2018, consecutive patients with DCIS and breast conserving surgery (BCS) were enrolled and randomly assigned to a training cohort (n = 181) and internally validation cohort (n = 78). Multivariate analyses were performed to identify predictors of IBTR. Model performance was evaluated by the concordance index (C-index) and calibration plot. The time-to-event curves were calculated by the Kaplan–Meier methods and compared by the log-rank test. Results: In total, 259 patients were enrolled and 182 of them received whole breast irradiation (WBI). After a median follow-up of 51.02 months, 23 IBTR events occurred in the whole cohort. By multivariate analyses of training cohort, presence of microinvasion, Ki67 index >14%, mammographic-clustered fine linear microcalcifications and neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio before BCS (preop-NLR), >1.1 remained independent risk factors of IBTR to develop a nomogram. The C-indexes of the nomogram were 0.87 and 0.86 in the training and internal validation set, respectively. Calibration plots illustrated good agreement between the predictions and actual observations for 5-year IBTR. Cut-off values of nomogram point were identified as 53 and 115 points, which divided all patients into low-, intermediate- and high-risk groups. Significant differences in IBTR existed between low-, intermediate- and high-risk subgroups (p < 0.01). For the whole cohort and ER-positive tumours, the benefit of WBI was found only in the intermediate-risk subgroup, but not in those with low or high risk. Fourteen out of 23 IBTRs occurred outside the original quadrant and all occurred in the high-risk group. Conclusions: The novel nomogram demonstrated potential to separate the risk of IBTR and locations of IBTR. For the whole cohort and ER-positive tumours, the benefit of WBI was restricted to an intermediate-risk subgroup.