Junqiang Niu

Mr. Junqiang Niu


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

3Years (2024-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
24 December 2024 in Horticulturae
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CDChenglong Du
Chenglong Du
YYYu Yu
Yu Yu
HHHuanhuan Hu
Huanhuan Hu
ZDZhiqi Dou
Zhiqi Dou
CZCunwu Zuo
Cunwu Zuo
JNJunqiang Niu
Junqiang Niu
The ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter family plays a critical role in plant growth, development, and disease resistance. However, the evolution and functional characteristics of the ABC gene family in Rosaceae species have not been fully studied. In this study, we performed the first whole-genome identification, as well as an evolutionary analysis and comparative analysis of ABC genes in Rosaceae plants. We identified 3037 ABC genes in 20 plant species, classifying them into eight subfamilies. Comparative analysis revealed significant variations in family size and expansion patterns among species, suggesting adaptive evolution. Tandem duplication (TD: where genes are duplicated in sequence) and whole-genome duplication (WGD: duplication of the entire genome) were identified as the primary drivers of ABC family expansion. In pears, gene pairs produced by WGD underwent purifying selection. Gene ontology (GO) enrichment analysis indicated the involvement of ABC proteins in transmembrane transport and signal transduction pathways. Under Valsa pyri infection, most ABC genes were upregulated in the early stages, highlighting the role of ABCG genes in pathogen response. A weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) identified five key ABCG genes potentially involved in pathogen resistance regulation. Our findings provide insights into the evolutionary adaptability of the ABC gene family and their potential applications in plant disease defense.

30 September 2025 in PeerJ
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ZYZehua Yang
Zehua Yang
TGTianli Guo
Tianli Guo
JNJunqiang Niu
Junqiang Niu
XYXiaoning Yin
Xiaoning Yin
MMMing Ma
Ming Ma
Background: In China, a majority of apple orchards were initially planted under arboriculture. The branch number increases, causing a deterioration of the canopy light conditions as the trees age. This phenomenon blocks bud differentiation, resulting in yield decrease and deterioration of fruit quality. Thinning and reshaping are effective strategies for addressing these issues. However, the impact of thinning and reshaping remains unclear. This study analyzed the physiological and metabolic aspects of flower bud differentiation following thinning and reshaping of an overcrowded orchard. Methods: Physiological and metabolomic analyses were conducted on terminal flower bud samples collected during early (T1) and late (T2) bud differentiation following thinning and reshaping alongside controls CK1 and CK2. Results: Sucrose, glucose, fructose, and sorbitol contents in T1 and T2 groups were significantly higher than in CK1 and CK2. Metabolomic analysis revealed significant differences: 60 metabolites (32 up-regulated, 28 down-regulated) in T1 vs CK1 and 51 metabolites (26 up-regulated, 25 down-regulated) in T2 vs CK2. KEGG enrichment analysis revealed that the biosynthesis of secondary metabolites was the most enriched pathway, with the crucial compounds associated with flower bud differentiation. There was an accumulation of coumarin (C05851), eriodictyol (C05631), and histidine (C00135) during both the early and late stages of flower bud differentiation, underscoring their promoting role. In T1 vs CK1, 2-isopropylmalic acid (C02504), (+)-catechin (C09727), and trans-ferulic acid (C01494) were significantly up-regulated, highlighting their potential as metabolic activators. Conversely, 3’,5’-dimethoxy-3,5,7,4’-tetrahydroxyflavone (C11620) and 4-hydroxyphenylpyruvic acid (C01179) decreased, implying divergent regulatory mechanisms. Temporal specificity emerged in T2 vs CK2, with significant upregulation of myricetin (C10107) and isopimpinellin (C02162). In contrast, umbelliferone (C09315) and trans-caffeic acid (C01197) exhibited opposing trends. Moreover, jasmonic acid (C08491) and 6-phosphogluconic acid (C00345) increased sharply in T2, while trans-traumatic acid (C16308) declined. Conclusions: Thinning and reshaping improved light penetration and increased the accumulation of nutrients and secondary metabolites. Sucrose, glucose, fructose, and sorbitol contents and the relative levels of coumarin, eriodictyol, and histidine increased during early and late flower bud differentiation stages, which suggested their positive roles during these stages. 2-isopropylmalic acid, (+)-catechin, and trans-ferulic acid exhibited metabolic activation potential, while 3’,5’-dimethoxyflavone and 4-hydroxyphenylpyruvic acid were distinctly regulated in T1 vs CK1. Myricetin, isopimpinellin, jasmonic acid, and 6-phosphogluconic acid exhibited activation potential, while trans-traumatic acid was distinctly regulated in T2 vs CK2. Metabolic changes and pathway-specific activation/inhibition patterns underlying flower bud differentiation exhibited a direct-indirect regulatory network in secondary metabolism.