Ana Buján

Dr. Ana Buján

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

18Years (2009-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
23 February 2016 in Frontiers in Neuroscience
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Claudio BabiloniClaudio Babiloni
Claudio Babiloni
ATAntonio I. Triggiani
Antonio I. Triggiani
RLRoberta Lizio
Roberta Lizio
SCSusanna Cordone
Susanna Cordone
GTGiacomo Tattoli
Giacomo Tattoli
CPClaudio del Percio
Claudio del Percio
Previous studies have shown abnormal power and functional connectivity of resting state electroencephalographic (EEG) rhythms in groups of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) compared to healthy elderly (Nold) subjects. Here we tested the best classification rate of 120 AD patients and 100 matched Nold subjects using EEG markers based on cortical sources of power and functional connectivity of these rhythms. EEG data were recorded during resting state eyes-closed condition. Exact low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (eLORETA) estimated the power and functional connectivity of cortical sources in frontal, central, parietal, occipital, temporal, and limbic regions. Delta (2-4 Hz), theta (4-8 Hz), alpha 1 (8-10.5 Hz), alpha 2 (10.5-13 Hz), beta 1 (13-20 Hz), beta 2 (20-30 Hz), and gamma (30-40 Hz) were the frequency bands of interest. The classification rates of interest were those with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) higher than 0.7 as a threshold for a moderate classification rate (i.e. 70%). Results showed that the following EEG markers overcame this threshold: (i) central, parietal, occipital, temporal, and limbic delta/alpha 1 current density; (ii) central, parietal, occipital temporal, and limbic delta/alpha 2 current density; (iii) frontal theta/alpha 1 current density; (iv) occipital delta/alpha 1 inter-hemispherical connectivity; (v) occipital-temporal theta/alpha 1 right and left intra-hemispherical connectivity; and (vi) parietal-limbic alpha 1 right intra-hemispherical connectivity. Occipital delta/alpha 1 current density showed the best classification rate (sensitivity of 73.3%, specificity of 78%, accuracy of 75.5%, and AUROC of 82%). These results suggest that EEG source markers can classify Nold and AD individuals with a moderate classification rate higher than 80%.

19 May 2018 in Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AMAna Maseda
Ana Maseda
NCNuria Cibeira
Nuria Cibeira
LLLaura Lorenzo-López
Laura Lorenzo-López
IGIsabel González-Abraldes
Isabel González-Abraldes
ABAna Buján
Ana Buján
JMJosé Carlos Millán-Calenti
José Carlos Millán-Calenti
Background: Multisensory stimulation and individualized music have shown to be good in handling the psychological and behavioral symptoms in people with severe dementia. Objective: Explore the effects of two nonpharmacological interventions, multisensory stimulation environment (MSSE) in a Snoezelen room and individualized music sessions, on mood, behavior, and biomedical parameters of institutionalized elderly patients with severe dementia. Methods: Randomized trial of 21 patients aged ≥65 years randomly assigned to two groups (MSSE and individualized music). Interventions administered in two-weekly sessions lasted 30 minutes for a period of 12 weeks. Main outcomes were recorded before, during, and at the end of the intervention. Results: Both groups had immediate positive effects on mood and behavior. Participants were more happy/more content ( p < 0.001), talked more spontaneously ( p = 0.009), related to people better ( p = 0.002), were more attentive to/focused on their environment ( p < 0.001), enjoyed themselves ( p = 0.003), were less bored/inactive ( p = 0.004), and more relaxed/content ( p = 0.003). The MSSE group performed a better visual follow-up of the stimuli ( p = 0.044), and the music group were more relaxed and happy ( p = 0.003). A decrease in heart rate ( p = 0.013) and an increase in oxygen saturation ( p = 0.011) were observed from before to after interventions in both groups, with no significant differences between them. Conclusions: Both interventions seem to be effective at managing mood and behavioral disturbances in the short term and at improving physiological rates, highlighting the efficacy of nonpharmacological treatments in patients with severe dementia.

1 January 2019 in Maturitas
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LLLaura Lorenzo-López
Laura Lorenzo-López
RLRocío López López
Rocío López López
AMAna Maseda
Ana Maseda
ABAna Buján
Ana Buján
JRJosé L. Rodríguez-Villamil
José L. Rodríguez-Villamil
JCJosé C. Millán Calenti
José C. Millán Calenti

6 March 2014 in American Journal of Alzheimer's Disease and Other Dementias®
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AMAna Maseda
Ana Maseda
ASAlba Sánchez
Alba Sánchez
MMMª Pilar Marante
Mª Pilar Marante
IGIsabel González-Abraldes
Isabel González-Abraldes
ABAna Buján
Ana Buján
JCJosé C. Millán Calenti
José C. Millán Calenti
Long-term effects of multisensory stimulation were assessed using a “Snoezelen” room on older residents with dementia. Thirty patients were randomly assigned to 3 groups: multisensory stimulation environment (MSSE) group, individualized activities (activity) group, and control group. The MSSE and activity groups participated in two 30-minute weekly individualized intervention sessions over 16 weeks. Pre-, mid-, posttrial, and 8-week follow-up behavior, mood, cognitive, and functional impairment in basic activities of daily living were registered. Items included in the physically nonaggressive behavior factor improved significantly in post- versus pretrial in the MSSE group compared to the activity group, with no significant differences between MSSE and control groups. The MSSE and activity groups demonstrated behavior improvements and higher scores on the Cohen-Mansfield agitation inventory, verbal agitated behavior factor, and Neuropsychiatric Inventory–Nursing Home, with no significant differences between groups. The MSSE could have long-term positive effects on such neuropsychiatric symptoms in older people with dementia.

1 May 2015 in Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Carmen de LabraCarmen de Labra
Carmen de Labra
JCJosé C. Millán Calenti
José C. Millán Calenti
ABAna Buján
Ana Buján
LNLaura Núñez-Naveira
Laura Núñez-Naveira
AJAnders M. Jensen
Anders M. Jensen
AMAna Maseda
Ana Maseda
The prevalence of dementia is increasing and consequently the demands from families, institutions and healthcare system. Although a substantial amount of research on caregiving has emphasized the negative aspects of caregiving, specifically on caregiver burden and depression, less attention has been paid to the positive aspects of caregiving. The aim of the present work was to study the phenomenon of caregiving satisfaction in informal caregivers of people with dementia by assessing their likely predictors. A stress process model was used to study caregiver's satisfaction (measured using the Revised Caregiving Satisfaction Scale) on 101 informal caregivers of patients with dementia in relation to the caregiver's background and context, stress-related factors, and mediators. The regression model has an adjusted R(2) of 0.20, which indicates that having a consanguinity relationship with the care recipient, suffering from lower levels of subjective burden, and managing individuals with severe cognitive impairment are the most important predictors of higher caregiving satisfaction. Interventions focused on the enhancement of the caregiving satisfaction by increasing the understanding of the disease, should be especially addressed to caregivers without a consanguinity relationship and with high levels of subjective burden, and to those managing care recipients with mild or moderate stages of dementia.

7 March 2018 in BMC Geriatrics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Carmen de LabraCarmen de Labra
Carmen de Labra
AMAna Maseda
Ana Maseda
LLLaura Lorenzo-López
Laura Lorenzo-López
RLRocío López López
Rocío López López
ABAna Buján
Ana Buján
JCJosé C. Millán Calenti
José C. Millán Calenti
Frailty is a multidimensional clinical geriatric syndrome that may be reversed in its early stages. Most studies have paid attention to its physical or phenotypic boundaries, however, little is known about the social aspects surrounding this geriatric syndrome. The study examined the relationship between socio-demographic factors, social resources, quality of life and frailty in older adults. This cross-sectional study included a representative sample (n = 749) of adults aged ≥65 years enrolled in forty-three senior centers located in North-West Spain. Socio-demographic data, social resources by the Older Americans Resources and Services Scale, quality of life by the World Health Organization’s Quality of Life measure-brief version (WHOQOL-BREF), and frailty status diagnosed by the Frailty phenotype were measured. Female gender, age older than 75 years, single marital status, a poor quality of life, and low scores in the physical health domain of the WHOQOL-BREF were the main determinants of being non-robust. Together, these variables explained 24.4% of the variance. Age between 80 and 89 years, and a poor quality of life were the main determinants for non-robust men, whilst the physical health domain of the WHOQOL-BREF was the single main determinant for women. Our study found evidence that physical frailty is associated with social determinants and several quality of life domains. More research on this understudied topic is needed to avoid healthcare expenditures and improve the quality of life of non-robust elders.