Cory T. Forbes

Dr. Cory T. Forbes

University of Nebraska-Lincoln, NE, USA
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

23Years (2004-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
13 November 2020 in Journal of Geoscience Education
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DBDevarati Bhattacharya
Devarati Bhattacharya
KSKimberly N Carroll Steward
Kimberly N Carroll Steward
Cory T. ForbesCory T. Forbes
Cory T. Forbes
Developing understanding about the Earth’s climate and the phenomenon of global climate change (GCC) is essential for all students, our future citizens and decision-makers. Recent implementation of the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) has intensified the focus on teaching and learning of the Earth’s climate and GCC in formal learning environments. Concurrently, the empirical research associated with climate education has also increased. We used an exhaustive, stepwise process to search for and identify relevant literature, systematically analyzing 178 empirical, peer-reviewed studies focused on climate literacy and education in formal K-16 settings. Thematic analysis was then used to identify focal research areas, and describe 1) trends in education research focused on the Earth’s climate and GCC, 2) student knowledge, conceptions, beliefs, and their learning about the Earth’s climate and GCC, and 3) teacher knowledge, conceptions, beliefs, practices, and their preparation about teaching Earth’s climate and GCC. The results of this review summarize challenges faced by both teachers and students in developing their knowledge about GCC. Findings from this literature review will help guide design of curriculum and instruction for climate change content in K-16 classrooms, as well as professional development and teacher preparation about Earth’s climate and GCC in K-16 contexts.

6 April 2010 in Journal of Research in Science Teaching
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Cory T. ForbesCory T. Forbes
Cory T. Forbes
EDElizabeth A. Davis
Elizabeth A. Davis

1 May 2011 in Teaching and Teacher Education
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
EDElizabeth A. Davis
Elizabeth A. Davis
CBCarrie Beyer
Carrie Beyer
Cory T. ForbesCory T. Forbes
Cory T. Forbes
SSShawn Stevens
Shawn Stevens

20 March 2015 in Journal of Research in Science Teaching
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Cory T. ForbesCory T. Forbes
Cory T. Forbes
Laura ZangoriLaura Zangori
Laura Zangori
CSChristina V. Schwarz
Christina V. Schwarz

18 February 2020 in International Journal of Science Education
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Cory T. ForbesCory T. Forbes
Cory T. Forbes
KNKnut Neumann
Knut Neumann
ASAnja Schiepe-Tiska
Anja Schiepe-Tiska
Scientific literacy is a central aim of science education. The Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) provides a measure of secondary students’ scientific literacy and reported science instruction in 72 countries. Researchers have analyzed PISA data to identify important relationships between science instruction and students’ science achievement. The purpose of this study is to further explore these relationships by using PISA 2015 data from a sample of 13 participating countries representing a range of mean science achievement. We use Latent Profile Analysis (LPA) to explore how students from highest- and lowest-performing profiles characterize the inquiry-based science instruction they experience. We then use cluster analysis to compare patterns in inquiry-based instruction reported by students in the highest-performing profiles in each country and examine relationships between inquiry-based and other instructional practices. Findings from our analysis reveal fundamental differences in the frequency and nature of inquiry-based instruction reported by students associated with the highest and lowest levels of science achievement. For the highest performing profiles of students, results illustrate both consistencies and unique features of science instruction students report across four distinct clusters of countries. We discuss implications of these results for theory, research, and the design of science learning environments.

10 October 2018 in Journal of Research in Science Teaching
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
BBBen Baumfalk
Ben Baumfalk
DBDevarati Bhattacharya
Devarati Bhattacharya
TVTina Vo
Tina Vo
Cory T. ForbesCory T. Forbes
Cory T. Forbes
Laura ZangoriLaura Zangori
Laura Zangori
CSChristina Schwarz
Christina Schwarz