Considering the complexity of the current framework in oncology, the relevance of animal models in biomedical research is critical in light of the capacity to produce valuable data with clinical translation. The laboratory mouse is the most common animal model used in cancer research due to its high adaptation to different environments, genetic variability, and physiological similarities with humans. Beginning with spontaneous mutations arising in mice colonies that allow for pursuing studies of specific pathological conditions, this area of in vivo research has significantly evolved, now capable of generating humanized mice models encompassing the human immune system in biological correlation with human tumor xenografts. Moreover, the era of genetic engineering, especially of the hijacking CRISPR/Cas9 technique, offers powerful tools in designing and developing various mouse strains. Within this article, we will cover the principal mouse models used in oncology research, beginning with behavioral science of animals vs. humans, and continuing on with genetically engineered mice, microsurgical-induced cancer models, and avatar mouse models for personalized cancer therapy. Moreover, the area of spontaneous large animal models for cancer research will be briefly presented.

Prostate cancer represents the most encountered urinary malignancy in males over 50 years old, and the second most diagnosed after lung cancer globally. Digital rectal examination and prostatic specific antigen were the long-time standard tools for diagnosis but with a significant risk of overdiagnosis and overtreatment. Magnetic resonance imaging recently entered the diagnosis process, but to this date, there is no specific biomarker that accurately indicates whether to proceed with the prostate biopsy. Research in this area has gone towards this direction, and recently, serum, urine, imagistic, tissue biomarkers, and Risk Calculators promise to help better diagnose and stratify prostate cancer. In order to eliminate the comorbidities that appear along with the diagnosis and treatment of this disease, there is a constant need to implement new diagnostic strategies. Important uro-oncology associations recommend the use of novel biomarkers in the grey area of prostate cancer, to better distinguish the next step in the diagnostic process. Although it is not that simple, they should be integrated according to the clinical policies, and it should be considered that statistical significance does not always equal clinical significance. In this review, we analyzed the contribution of prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-based biomarkers (PHI, PHID, 4Kscore, STHLM3), imagistic techniques (mp-MRI and mp-US), and combined tests in the early diagnosis process of localized prostate cancer.

Prostate cancer is one of the most encountered cancer diseases in men worldwide and in consequence it requires the improvement of therapeutic strategies. For the clinical diagnosis, the standard approach is represented by solid biopsy. From a surgical point of view, this technique represents an invasive procedure that may imply several postoperative complications. To overcome these impediments, many trends are focusing on developing liquid biopsy assays and on implementing them in clinical practice. Liquid samples (blood, urine) are rich in analytes, especially in transcriptomic information provided by genetic markers. Additionally, molecular characterization regarding microRNAs content reveals outstanding prospects in understanding cancer progression mechanisms. Moreover, these analytes have great potential for prostate cancer early detection, more accurate prostate cancer staging and also for decision making respecting therapy schemes. However, there are still questionable topics and more research is needed to standardize liquid biopsy-based techniques.

It is possible to obtain diagnostically relevant data on the changes in biochemical elements brought on by cancer via the use of multivariate analysis of vibrational spectra recorded on biological fluids. Prostate cancer and control groups included in this research generated almost similar SERS spectra, which means that the values of peak intensities present in SERS spectra can only give unspecific and limited information for distinguishing between the two groups. Our diagnostic algorithm for prostate cancer (PCa) differentiation was built using principal component analysis and linear discriminant analysis (PCA-LDA) analysis of spectral data, which has been widely used in spectral data management in many studies and has shown promising results so far. In order to fully utilize the entire SERS spectrum and automatically determine the most meaningful spectral features that can be used to differentiate PCa from healthy patients, we perform a multivariate analysis on both the entire and specific spectral intervals. Using the PCA-LDA model, the prostate cancer and control groups are clearly distinguished in our investigation. The separability of the following two data sets is also evaluated using two alternative discrimination techniques: principal least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) and principal component analysis—support vector machine (PCA-SVM).

The human microbiome represents the diversity of microorganisms that live together at different organ sites, influencing various physiological processes and leading to pathological conditions, even carcinogenesis, in case of a chronic imbalance. Additionally, the link between organ-specific microbiota and cancer has attracted the interest of numerous studies and projects. In this review article, we address the important aspects regarding the role of gut, prostate, urinary and reproductive system, skin, and oral cavity colonizing microorganisms in prostate cancer development. Various bacteria, fungi, virus species, and other relevant agents with major implications in cancer occurrence and progression are also described. Some of them are assessed based on their values of prognostic or diagnostic biomarkers, while others are presented for their anti-cancer properties.

Background and Objectives: Radiomics and artificial intelligence (AI) offer emerging quantitative tools for enhancing the diagnostic evaluation of testicular cancer. Conventional imaging—ultrasound (US), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and computed tomography (CT)—remains central to management but has limited ability to characterize tumor subtypes, detect occult nodal disease, or differentiate necrosis, teratoma, and viable tumor in post-chemotherapy residual masses. This systematic review summarizes current advances in radiomics and AI for both primary tumors and retroperitoneal disease. Materials and Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science identified studies applying radiomics or AI to testicular tumors, retroperitoneal lymph nodes and post-chemotherapy residual masses. Eligible studies included quantitative imaging analyses performed on ultrasound, MRI, and CT, with optional integration of clinical or molecular biomarkers. Eighteen studies met inclusion criteria and were evaluated with respect to methodological design, diagnostic performance, and translational readiness. Results: Across modalities, radiomics demonstrated encouraging discriminatory capacity, with accuracies of 74–82% for ultrasound, 80.7–97.9% for MRI, and 71.7–85.3% for CT. CT-based radiomics for post-chemotherapy residual masses showed moderate ability to distinguish necrosis/fibrosis, teratoma, and viable germ-cell tumor, though heterogeneous methodologies and limited external validation constrained generalizability. The strongest performance was observed in multimodal approaches: integrating radiomics with clinical variables or circulating microRNAs improved accuracy by up to 12% and 15%, respectively, mirroring gains reported in other oncologic radiomics applications. Persisting variability in segmentation practices, acquisition protocols, feature extraction, and machine-learning methods highlights ongoing barriers to reproducibility. Conclusions: Radiomics and AI-enhanced frameworks represent promising adjuncts for improving the noninvasive evaluation of testicular cancer, particularly when combined with clinical or molecular biomarkers. Future progress will depend on standardized imaging protocols, harmonized radiomics pipelines, and multicenter prospective validation. With continued methodological refinement and clinical integration, radiomics may support more precise risk stratification and reduce unnecessary interventions in testicular cancer.