Background: DC derived-exosomes are nanomeric vesicles harboring functional MHC/peptide complexes capable of promoting T cell immune responses and tumor rejection. Here we report the feasability and safety of the first Phase I clinical trial using autologous exosomes pulsed with MAGE 3 peptides for the immunization of stage III/IV melanoma patients. Secondary endpoints were the monitoring of T cell responses and the clinical outcome. Patients and methods: Exosomes were purified from day 7 autologous monocyte derived-DC cultures. Fifteen patients fullfilling the inclusion criteria (stage IIIB and IV, HLA-A1+, or -B35+ and HLA-DPO4+ leukocyte phenotype, tumor expressing MAGE3 antigen) were enrolled from 2000 to 2002 and received four exosome vaccinations. Two dose levels of either MHC class II molecules (0.13 versus 0.40 × 1014 molecules) or peptides (10 versus 100 μg/ml) were tested. Evaluations were performed before and 2 weeks after immunization. A continuation treatment was performed in 4 cases of non progression. Results: The GMP process allowed to harvest about 5 × 1014 exosomal MHC class II molecules allowing inclusion of all 15 patients. There was no grade II toxicity and the maximal tolerated dose was not achieved. One patient exhibited a partial response according to the RECIST criteria. This HLA-B35+/A2+ patient vaccinated with A1/B35 defined CTL epitopes developed halo of depigmentation around naevi, a MART1-specific HLA-A2 restricted T cell response in the tumor bed associated with progressive loss of HLA-A2 and HLA-BC molecules on tumor cells during therapy with exosomes. In addition, one minor, two stable and one mixed responses were observed in skin and lymph node sites. MAGE3 specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cell responses could not be detected in peripheral blood. Conclusion: The first exosome Phase I trial highlighted the feasibility of large scale exosome production and the safety of exosome administration.
Background: Gene expression profiling data for human primary cutaneous melanomas are scarce because of the lack of retrospective collections of frozen tumors. To identify differentially expressed genes that may be involved in melanoma progression and prognosis, we investigated the relationship between gene expression profiles and clinical outcome in a cohort of patients with primary melanoma. Methods: Labeled complementary RNA (cRNA) from each tissue sample was hybridized to a pangenomic 44K 60-mer oligonucleotide microarray. Class comparison and class prediction analyses were performed to identify genes whose expression in primary melanomas was associated with 4-year distant metastasis–free survival among 58 patients with at least 4 years of follow-up, distant metastasis, or death. Results were validated immunohistochemically at the protein level in 176 independent primary melanomas from patients with a median clinical follow-up of 8.5 years. Survival was analyzed with a Cox multivariable model and stratified log-rank test. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results: We identified 254 genes that were associated with distant metastasis–free survival of patients with primary melanoma. These 254 genes include genes involved in activating DNA replication origins, such as minichromosome maintenance genes and geminin. Twenty-three of these genes were studied at the protein level; expression of five (MCM4, P = .002; MCM3, P = .030; MCM6, P = .004; KPNA2, P = .021; and geminin, P = .004) was statistically significantly associated with overall survival in the validation set. In a multivariable Cox model adjusted for tumor thickness, ulceration, age, and sex, expression of MCM4 (hazard ratio [HR] of death = 4.04, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.39 to 11.76; P = .010) and MCM6 (HR of death = 7.42, 95% CI = 1.99 to 27.64; P = .003) proteins was still statistically significantly associated with overall survival. Conclusion: We identified 254 genes whose expression was associated with metastatic dissemination of cutaneous melanomas. These genes may shed light on the molecular mechanisms underlying poor prognosis in melanoma patients.
Germline mutations in the p16 and CDK4 genes have been reported in a subset of melanoma pedigrees, but their prevalence is not well known. We searched for such germline mutations in 48 French melanoma-prone families selected according to two major criteria: families with at least three affected members (n = 20) or families with two affected members, one of them affected before the age of 50 (n = 28), and one additional minor criterion. Sixteen different p16 germline mutations were found in 21 families, while one germline mutation, Arg24His, was detected in the CDK4 gene. The frequency of p16 gene mutation in our sample (44%) is among the highest rates yet reported and the CDK4mutation is the second mutation detected in this gene worldwide. In summary, our results show frequent involvement of the p16 gene in familial melanoma and confirm the role of the CDK4 gene as a melanoma-predisposing gene.