Yuan-Guo Zhou

Prof. Yuan-Guo Zhou

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

28Years (1999-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
21 April 2010 in Journal of Neuroscience
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SDShuang-Shuang Dai
Shuang-Shuang Dai
YZYuan-Guo Zhou
Yuan-Guo Zhou
WLWei Li
Wei Li
JAJian-Hong An
Jian-Hong An
PLPing Li
Ping Li
JCJiang-Fan Chen
Jiang-Fan Chen
During brain injury, extracellular adenosine and glutamate levels increase rapidly and dramatically. We hypothesized that local glutamate levels in the brain dictates the adenosine–adenosine A2Areceptor (A2AR) effects on neuroinflammation and brain damage outcome. Here, we showed that, in the presence of low concentrations of glutamate, the A2AR agonist 3-[4-[2-[[6-amino-9-[(2R,3R,4S,5S)-5-(ethylcarbamoyl)-3,4-dihydroxy-oxolan-2-yl]purin-2-yl]amino]ethyl]phenyl]propanoic acid (CGS21680) inhibited lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced nitric oxide synthase (NOS) activity of cultured microglial cells, an effect that was dependent on the protein kinase A (PKA) pathway. However, in high concentrations of glutamate, CGS21680 increased LPS-induced NOS activity in a protein kinase C (PKC)-dependent manner. Thus, increasing the local level of glutamate redirects A2AR signaling from the PKA to the PKC pathway, resulting in a switch in A2AR effects from antiinflammatory to proinflammatory. In a cortical impact model of traumatic brain injury (TBI) in mice, brain water contents, behavioral deficits, and expression of tumor necrosis factor-α, interleukin-1 mRNAs, and inducible NOS were attenuated by administering CGS21680 at post-TBI time when brain glutamate levels were low, or by administering the A2AR antagonist ZM241385 [4-(2-{[5-amino-2-(2-furyl)[1,2,4]triazolo[1,5-a][1,3,5]triazin-7-yl]amino}ethyl)phenol] at post-TBI time when brain glutamate levels were elevated. Furthermore, pre-TBI treatment with the glutamate release inhibitor (S)-4C3HPG [(S)-4-carboxy-3-hydroxyphenylglycine] converted the debilitating effect of CGS21680 administered at post-TBI time with high glutamate level to a neuroprotective effect. This further indicates that the switch in the effect of A2AR activation in intact animals from antiinflammatory to proinflammatory is dependent on glutamate concentration. These findings identify a novel role for glutamate in modulation of neuroinflammation and brain injury via the adenosine–A2AR system.

1 April 2011 in Reviews in the Neurosciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SDShuang-Shuang Dai
Shuang-Shuang Dai
YZYuan-Guo Zhou
Yuan-Guo Zhou
This review summarizes recent developments that have contributed to our understanding of how adenosine 2A receptors (A2ARs) modulate brain damage in various animal models of acute neurological injuries, including brain ischemia, traumatic brain injury, spinal cord injury and hemorrhage stroke. The main conclusions are: (1) pharmacological, neurochemical and molecular/genetic approaches to the complex actions of A2AR in different cellular elements suggest that A2AR activation exerts bidirectional effect (detrimental or protective) after brain insults; (2) modulation of glutamate excitotoxicity and neuroinflammation are involved in the protection of A2AR agonists or antagonists, but the bidirectional effect of A2AR is largely due to the bidirectional regulation of neuroinflammation (anti-inflammation or proinflammation) by A2AR on immune cells such as microglia cells and peripheral bone marrow cells; and (3) the bidirectional effect of A2AR on neuroinflammation and brain injury depends on the distinct and sometimes opposite actions of A2AR in various cellular elements and on different injury models and associated pathological conditions. The local glutamate level in the brain injury is one of the crucial factors that contribute to the direction of A2AR effect on neuroinflammation and brain injury outcome. These developments presented here clearly highlight the complexity of using A2AR agents therapeutically in acute neuronal injuries and confirm that A2AR ligands have many promising characteristics that encourage the pursuit of their full therapeutic potential.

19 October 2021 in Journal of Neuroinflammation
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
STSi-Wei Tan
Si-Wei Tan
YZYan Zhao
Yan Zhao
PLPing Li
Ping Li
YNYa-Lei Ning
Ya-Lei Ning
ZHZhi-Zhong Huang
Zhi-Zhong Huang
YZYuan-Guo Zhou
Yuan-Guo Zhou
Background: Cognitive impairment in the late stage of traumatic brain injury (TBI) is associated with the NOD-, LRR and pyrin domain-containing protein 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome, which plays an important role in neuroinflammation. Although classical inflammatory pathways have been well-documented in the late stage of TBI (4–8 weeks post-injury), the mechanism by which the NLRP3 inflammasome impairs cognition is still unclear.Methods: Mice lacking the gene encoding for NLRP3 (NLRP3-knockout mice) and their wild-type littermates were used in a controlled cortical impact model of TBI. Levels of NLRP3 inflammasome and inflammatory factors such as IL-1β and HMGB1 were detected in post-injury hippocampal tissue, as well as long-term potentiation. Behaviors were assessed by T-maze test, novel object recognition, and nesting tests. Glycyrrhizin was used to antagonize HMGB1. Calcium imaging were performed on primary neuronal cultures.Results: By using the NLRP3-knockout TBI model, we found that the continuous activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome and high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) release were closely related to cognitive impairment. We also found that inhibition of HMGB1 improved LTP reduction and cognitive function by increasing the phosphorylation level of the NMDAR1 subunit at serine 896 while reducing NLRP3 inflammasome activation.Conclusion: NLRP3 inflammasome damages memory in the late stage of TBI primarily through HMGB1 upregulation and provides an explanation for the long-term progression of cognitive dysfunction.

14 February 2018 in Cell Death & Disease
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
XZXu-Jia Zeng
Xu-Jia Zeng
PLPing Li
Ping Li
YNYa-Lei Ning
Ya-Lei Ning
YZYan Zhao
Yan Zhao
YPYan Peng
Yan Peng
YZYuan-Guo Zhou
Yuan-Guo Zhou
Recent studies have shown that after traumatic brain injury (TBI), the number of autophagosomes is markedly increased in brain cells surrounding the wound; however, whether autophagy is enhanced or suppressed by TBI remains controversial. In our study, we used a controlled cortical impact system to establish models of mild, moderate and severe TBI. In the mild TBI model, the levels of autophagy-related protein 6 (Beclin1) and autophagy-related protein 12 (ATG12)-autophagy-related protein 5 (ATG5) conjugates were increased, indicating the enhanced initiation of autophagy. Furthermore, the level of the autophagic substrate sequestosome 1 (SQSTM1) was decreased in the ipsilateral cortex. This result, together with the results observed in tandem mRFP-GFP-LC3 adeno-associated virus (AAV)-infected mice, indicates that autophagosome clearance was also increased after mild TBI. Conversely, following moderate and severe TBI, there was no change in the initiation of autophagy, and autophagosome accumulation was observed. Next, we used chloroquine (CQ) to artificially impair autophagic flux in the injured cortex of the mild TBI model and found that the severity of trauma was obviously exacerbated. In addition, autophagic flux and trauma severity were significantly improved in adenosine A2A receptor (A2AR) knockout (KO) mice subjected to moderate TBI. Thus, A2AR may be involved in regulating the impairment of autophagic flux in response to brain injury. Our findings suggest that whether autophagy is increased after TBI is associated with whether autophagic flux is impaired, and the impairment of autophagic flux exacerbates the severity of trauma. Furthermore, A2AR may be a target for alleviating the impairment in autophagic flux after TBI.

5 December 2017 in Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
WBWei Bai
Wei Bai
YZYuan-Guo Zhou
Yuan-Guo Zhou
It is widely accepted that glutamate is the most important excitatory neurotransmitter in the central nervous system (CNS). However, there is also a large amount of glutamate in the blood. Generally, the concentration gradient of glutamate between intraparenchymal and blood environments is stable. However, this gradient is dramatically disrupted under a variety of pathological conditions, resulting in an amplifying cascade that causes a series of pathological reactions in the CNS and peripheral organs. This eventually seriously worsens a patient’s prognosis. These two “isolated” systems are rarely considered as a whole even though they mutually influence each other. In this review, we summarize what is currently known regarding the maintenance, imbalance and regulatory mechanisms that control the intraparenchymal-blood glutamate concentration gradient, discuss the interrelationships between these systems and further explore their significance in clinical practice.

26 November 2010 in The Journal of Pathology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PLPing Liu
Ping Liu
RXRen‐Ping Xiong
Ren‐Ping Xiong
XCXing‐Yun Chen
Xing‐Yun Chen
YZYan Zhao
Yan Zhao
WLWei‐Ping Lu
Wei‐Ping Lu
YZYuan-Guo Zhou
Yuan-Guo Zhou