Satoshi Soda

Prof. Dr. Satoshi Soda

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

26Years (2001-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
EDErica Danzl
Erica Danzl
KSKazunari Sei
Kazunari Sei
SSSatoshi Soda
Satoshi Soda
MIMichihiko Ike
Michihiko Ike
MFMasanori Fujita
Masanori Fujita
A group of compounds structurally similar to bis(4-hydroxyphenyl)propane (bisphenol A, BPA) are called bisphenols (BPs), and some of them can partially replace BPA in industrial applications. The production and consumption of BPs other than BPA, especially those of bis(4-hydroxyphenyl)methane (bisphenol F, BPF) and bis(4-hydroxy-phenyl)sulfone (bisphenol S, BPS), have increased recently, leading to their detection as contaminants in the aquatic environment. The three compounds tested 100% positive for estrus response in 1936 and concerns about their health risks have been increasing. Abundant data on degradation of bisphenols (BPs) has been published, but results for biodegradation of BPs in seawater are lacking. However, several research groups have focused on this topic recently. In this study, the biodegradation behaviors of three BPs, namely BPA, BPF and BPS, in seawater were investigated using TOC Handai (TOC, potential test) and river (sea) die-away (SDA, simulation test) methods, which are both a kind of river-die-away test. The main difference between the tests is that indigenous microcosms remain in the sampled raw seawater for the SDA experiments, but they are removed through filtration and dispersed into artificial seawater for the TOC experiments. The BPs, except for BPS, were degraded using both methods. The SDA method produced better biodegradation results than the TOC method in terms of degradation time (both lag and degradation periods). Biodegradation efficiencies were measured at 75-100% using the SDA method and 13-63% using the TOC method. BPF showed better degradation efficiency than BPA, BPF was > 92% and BPA 83% depleted according to the SDA tests. BPS degradation was not observed. As a conclusion, the biodegradability of the three BPs in seawater could be ranked as BPF > BPA >> BPS. BPF is more biodegradable than BPA in seawater and BPS is more likely to accumulate in the aquatic environment. BPS poses a lower risk to human health and to the environment than BPA or BPF but it is not amenable to biodegradation and might be persistent and become an ecological burden. Thus other degradation methods need to be found for the removal of BPS in the environment.

1 February 2017 in Science of The Total Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DADan A
Dan A
DFDaiki Fujii
Daiki Fujii
SSSatoshi Soda
Satoshi Soda
TMTakashi Machimura
Takashi Machimura
MIMichihiko Ike
Michihiko Ike

1 April 2017 in Science of The Total Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DADan A
Dan A
MOMasao Oka
Masao Oka
YFYuta Fujii
Yuta Fujii
SSSatoshi Soda
Satoshi Soda
TITomonori Ishigaki
Tomonori Ishigaki
MIMichihiko Ike
Michihiko Ike

1 June 2020 in Science of The Total Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TDThi To Uyen Dinh
Thi To Uyen Dinh
SSSatoshi Soda
Satoshi Soda
TNThi An Hang Nguyen
Thi An Hang Nguyen
JNJun Nakajima
Jun Nakajima
TCThe Ha Cao
The Ha Cao

1 October 2015 in Biomass and Bioenergy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SSSatoshi Soda
Satoshi Soda
TOTakeshi Ohchi
Takeshi Ohchi
JPJusakulvijit Piradee
Jusakulvijit Piradee
YTYuichiro Takai
Yuichiro Takai
MIMichihiko Ike
Michihiko Ike

1 January 2007 in Water Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SSSatoshi Soda
Satoshi Soda
MIM. Ike
M. Ike
YOY. Ogasawara
Y. Ogasawara
MYM. Yoshinaka
M. Yoshinaka
DMD. Mishima
D. Mishima
MFM. Fujita
M. Fujita