Eva Katharina Masel

Prof. Eva Katharina Masel

Division of Palliative Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

15Years (2012-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
18 October 2015 in Psycho-Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
BSBeate Schrank
Beate Schrank
AEAlexandra Ebert‐Vogel
Alexandra Ebert‐Vogel
MAMichaela Amering
Michaela Amering
EMEva Katharina Masel
Eva Katharina Masel
MNMarie Neubauer
Marie Neubauer
SSSophie Schur
Sophie Schur

17 October 2015 in Supportive Care in Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
TRT. Rumpold
T. Rumpold
SSS. Schur
S. Schur
MAM. Amering
M. Amering
KKK. Kirchheiner
K. Kirchheiner
EMEva Katharina Masel
Eva Katharina Masel
BSB. Schrank
B. Schrank

14 May 2016 in BMC Palliative Care
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
OGon behalf of the AUPACS (Austrian Palliative Care Study) Group
on behalf of the AUPACS (Austrian Palliative Care Study) Group
SSSophie Schur
Sophie Schur
DWDietmar Weixler
Dietmar Weixler
CGChristoph Gabl
Christoph Gabl
Gudrun Marie Ilse KreyeGudrun Marie Ilse Kreye
Gudrun Marie Ilse Kreye
HWHerbert Hans Watzke
Herbert Hans Watzke
Sedation is used to an increasing extent in end-of-life care. Definitions and indications in this field are based on expert opinions and case series. Little is known about this practice at palliative care units in Austria. Patients who died in Austrian palliative care units between June 2012 and June 2013 were identified. A predefined set of baseline characteristics and information on sedation during the last two weeks before death were obtained by reviewing the patients’ charts. The data of 2414 patients from 23 palliative care units were available for analysis. Five hundred two (21 %) patients received sedation in the last two weeks preceding their death, 356 (71 %) received continuous sedation until death, and 119 (24 %) received intermittent sedation. The median duration of sedation was 48 h (IQR 10–72 h); 168 patients (34 %) were sedated for less than 24 h. Indications for sedation were delirium (51 %), existential distress (32 %), dyspnea (30 %), and pain (20 %). Midazolam was the most frequently used drug (79 %), followed by lorazepam (13 %), and haloperidol (10 %). Sedated patients were significantly younger (median age 67 years vs. 74 years, p ≤ 0.001, r = 0.22), suffered more often from an oncological disease (92 % vs. 82 %, p ≤ 0.001, φ = 0.107), and were hospitalized more frequently (94 % vs. 76 %, p ≤ 0.001, φ = 0.175). The median number of days between admission to a palliative care ward/mobile palliative care team and death did not differ significantly in sedated versus non-sedated patients (10 vs. 9 days; p = 0.491). This study provides insights into the practice of end-of-life sedation in Austria. Critical appraisal of these data will serve as a starting point for the development of nation-wide guidelines for palliative sedation in Austria.

5 November 2015 in Supportive Care in Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KKKatharina A. Kierner
Katharina A. Kierner
DWDietmar Weixler
Dietmar Weixler
EMEva Katharina Masel
Eva Katharina Masel
VGVerena Gartner
Verena Gartner
HWHerbert H. Watzke
Herbert H. Watzke

18 July 2016 in Psycho-Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
BSBeate Schrank
Beate Schrank
TRTamara Rumpold
Tamara Rumpold
MAMichaela Amering
Michaela Amering
EMEva Katharina Masel
Eva Katharina Masel
HWHerbert Watzke
Herbert Watzke
SSSophie Schur
Sophie Schur

7 July 2016 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EMEva Katharina Masel
Eva Katharina Masel
AKAnna Kitta
Anna Kitta
PHPatrick Huber
Patrick Huber
TRTamara Rumpold
Tamara Rumpold
MUMatthias Unseld
Matthias Unseld
HWHerbert H Watzke
Herbert H Watzke
The aims of the study were to examine a) patients’ knowledge of palliative care, b) patients’ expectations and needs when being admitted to a palliative care unit, and c) patient’s concept of a good palliative care physician. The study was based on a qualitative methodology, comprising 32 semistructured interviews with advanced cancer patients admitted to the palliative care unit of the Medical University of Vienna. Interviews were conducted with 20 patients during the first three days after admission to the unit and after one week, recorded digitally, and transcribed verbatim. Data were analyzed using NVivo 10 software, based on thematic analysis enhanced with grounded theory techniques. The results revealed four themes: (1) information about palliative care, (2) supportive care needs, (3) being treated in a palliative care unit, and (4) qualities required of palliative care physicians. The data showed that patients lack information about palliative care, that help in social concerns plays a central role in palliative care, and attentiveness as well as symptom management are important to patients. Patients desire a personal patient-physician relationship. The qualities of a good palliative care physician were honesty, the ability to listen, taking time, being experienced in their field, speaking the patient’s language, being human, and being gentle. Patients experienced relief when being treated in a palliative care unit, perceived their care as an interdisciplinary activity, and felt that their burdensome symptoms were being attended to with emotional care. Negative perceptions included the overtly intense treatment. The results of the present study offer an insight into what patients expect from palliative care teams. Being aware of patient’s needs will enable medical teams to improve professional and individualized care.