Daniel Huizenga

Dr. Daniel Huizenga


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

6Years (2021-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 July 2021 in Journal of Human Rights Practice
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DHDaniel Huizenga
Daniel Huizenga
In this paper I contribute to critical literature on human rights practice by emphasizing how communities in South Africa leverage emerging transnational human rights norms to make progressive claims to property based on a revitalized customary law. I show the extent to which international Indigenous and peasant peoples’ rights are an important interpretive resource in contemporary struggles against the powers of autocratic traditional leaders and extractive industry. In an effort to emphasize the agency of rural communities, I develop a conceptual framework examining ‘law from below’ and the importance of studying ‘property in the margins’. I demonstrate that the use of Indigenous rights norms in South African litigation and social struggle is a process of human rights vernacularization in reverse whereby norms are developed locally through struggle and deliberation and translated into legal venues, effecting shifts in human rights norms and practice.

2 January 2022 in South African Historical Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DHDaniel Huizenga
Daniel Huizenga
The role of traditional authorities in contemporary South Africa is now the subject of a rich, extensive, and interdisciplinary body of work that illustrates the entanglements of authority, propert...

21 August 2026 in JBI Evidence Synthesis
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RHRoya Haghiri-Vijeh
Roya Haghiri-Vijeh
KNKat Newman-Seymour
Kat Newman-Seymour
TBTerri Beley
Terri Beley
MNMari Newman
Mari Newman
DHDaniel Huizenga
Daniel Huizenga
FSFatima Sobhan
Fatima Sobhan
Introduction: Gender-independent, intersex, nonbinary, transgender, genderqueer, and gender-diverse (GIaNT+) youth have reported the need for inclusive online puberty health and sex education programs. There is a limited number of knowledge syntheses that explore what is known about digital spaces that include games, apps, social media, and online educational resources/open-access websites for GIaNT+ youth. Objective: This scoping review reports how GIaNT+ youth engage with and experience gender-affirming and age-appropriate online resources to address their puberty health and/or sex education needs. Eligibility criteria: Quantitative studies, qualitative studies, mixed methods studies, discussions, and textual evidence papers reporting on gender-affirming and age-appropriate online resources focused on puberty health and/or sex education for GIaNT+ youth (aged 9 to 26 years) were included. Participants’ identification of online resources as supportive and not supportive, informative and not informative, as well as safe and unsafe was of interest. Methods: The JBI methodology for scoping reviews was utilized, following an a priori protocol. An extensive search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Cochrane, Epistemonikos, ERIC (EBSCOhost), GenderWatch, LGBTQ+ Source, ProQuest Central, ProQuest Dissertation and Theses Global, PsycINFO, and Scopus that included both peer-reviewed and gray literature. The initial search was conducted in July 2023 and repeated in September 2024. The search was not limited by language, global context, or publication date. Following the pilot tests, the titles/abstracts and full texts were screened independently by reviewers in dyads. The data were extracted using a data extraction tool developed by JBI and modified by the review team to capture the year of publication, country of origin, setting, study methods, and findings related to the review questions. The review findings are reported as a descriptive summary, with tables and figures supporting the data. Results: The search identified 11,495 sources, of which 56 were included. The included sources were published between 2005 and 2025 and were conducted across 5 countries. Sources included mixed methods study design, qualitative research design, narrative inquiry method design, descriptive phenomenology qualitative study design, cross-sectional study design, case study, quantitative study design, pre-/post-test methods (such as randomized controlled trials), and ethnography research design. The online resources were divided into 4 categories: games, apps, social media, and online educational resources/open-access websites. Many GIaNT+ youth use various online resources to access information about their puberty health and sex education needs. The findings identified the prevalence of co-development of online spaces with GIaNT+ youth. Several resources demonstrated online resources as modes of knowledge-making, community, as well as safe and unsafe spaces for GIaNT+ youth. Conclusions: Several age-appropriate and gender-affirming online resources on puberty health and sex education are available for GIaNT+ youth via games, apps, social media, and online educational resources/open-access websites. Online spaces may offer connections, peer mentors, a sense of belonging, and both safe and unsafe spaces. Future online resources may consider puberty health and sex education, and the inclusion of GIaNT+ youth in the development and dissemination of resources.