Joachim Heinrich

Prof. Joachim Heinrich

LMU Institute of occupational, social and environmental medicine
+1
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

42Years (1985-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
10 October 2010 in Nature Genetics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ESElizabeth K Speliotes
Elizabeth K Speliotes
MAMagic
Magic
CWCristen J Willer
Cristen J Willer
SBSonja I Berndt
Sonja I Berndt
KMKeri L Monda
Keri L Monda
OCon behalf of Procardis Consortium
on behalf of Procardis Consortium
Ruth Loos and colleagues report results of a large genome-wide association study for body mass index. They identify 18 new loci associated with this trait, some of which map near key hypothalamic regulators of energy balance. Obesity is globally prevalent and highly heritable, but its underlying genetic factors remain largely elusive. To identify genetic loci for obesity susceptibility, we examined associations between body mass index and ∼2.8 million SNPs in up to 123,865 individuals with targeted follow up of 42 SNPs in up to 125,931 additional individuals. We confirmed 14 known obesity susceptibility loci and identified 18 new loci associated with body mass index (P < 5 × 10−8), one of which includes a copy number variant near GPRC5B. Some loci (at MC4R, POMC, SH2B1 and BDNF) map near key hypothalamic regulators of energy balance, and one of these loci is near GIPR, an incretin receptor. Furthermore, genes in other newly associated loci may provide new insights into human body weight regulation.

1 October 2017 in Environmental Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Iana MarkevychIana Markevych
Iana Markevych
JSJulia Schoierer
Julia Schoierer
THTerry Hartig
Terry Hartig
ACAlexandra Chudnovsky
Alexandra Chudnovsky
PHPerry Hystad
Perry Hystad
Elaine FuertesElaine Fuertes
Elaine Fuertes
In a rapidly urbanizing world, many people have little contact with natural environments, which may affect health and well-being. Existing reviews generally conclude that residential greenspace is beneficial to health. However, the processes generating these benefits and how they can be best promoted remain unclear. During an Expert Workshop held in September 2016, the evidence linking greenspace and health was reviewed from a transdisciplinary standpoint, with a particular focus on potential underlying biopsychosocial pathways and how these can be explored and organized to support policy-relevant population health research. Potential pathways linking greenspace to health are here presented in three domains, which emphasize three general functions of greenspace: reducing harm (e.g. reducing exposure to air pollution, noise and heat), restoring capacities (e.g. attention restoration and physiological stress recovery) and building capacities (e.g. encouraging physical activity and facilitating social cohesion). Interrelations between among the three domains are also noted. Among several recommendations, future studies should: use greenspace and behavioural measures that are relevant to hypothesized pathways; include assessment of presence, access and use of greenspace; use longitudinal, interventional and (quasi)experimental study designs to assess causation; and include low and middle income countries given their absence in the existing literature. Cultural, climatic, geographic and other contextual factors also need further consideration. While the existing evidence affirms beneficial impacts of greenspace on health, much remains to be learned about the specific pathways and functional form of such relationships, and how these may vary by context, population groups and health outcomes. This Report provides guidance for further epidemiological research with the goal of creating new evidence upon which to develop policy recommendations.

1 March 2014 in The Lancet
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RBRob Beelen
Rob Beelen
OROle Raaschou-Nielsen
Ole Raaschou-Nielsen
Massimo StafoggiaMassimo Stafoggia
Massimo Stafoggia
ZAZorana Jovanovic Andersen
Zorana Jovanovic Andersen
GWGudrun Weinmayr
Gudrun Weinmayr
GHGerard Hoek
Gerard Hoek

1 October 2012 in Environmental Science & Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Marloes EeftensMarloes Eeftens
Marloes Eeftens
RBRob Beelen
Rob Beelen
KHKees de Hoogh
Kees de Hoogh
TBTom Bellander
Tom Bellander
GCGiulia Cesaroni
Giulia Cesaroni
GHGerard Hoek
Gerard Hoek

1 April 1997 in American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
APA Peters
A Peters
HWH E Wichmann
H E Wichmann
TTT Tuch
T Tuch
Joachim HeinrichJoachim Heinrich
Joachim Heinrich
JHJ Heyder
J Heyder
The association between fine and ultrafine particles and respiratory health was studied in adults with a history of asthma in Erfurt, Eastern Germany. Twenty-seven nonsmoking asthmatics recorded their peak expiratory flow (PEF) and respiratory symptoms daily. The size distribution of ambient particles in the range of 0.01 to 2.5 microm was determined with an aerosol spectrometer during the winter season 1991-1992. Most of the particles (73%) were in the ultrafine fraction (smaller than 0.1 microm in diameter), whereas most of the mass (82%) was attributable to particles in the size range of 0.1 to 0.5 microm. Because these two fractions did not have similar time courses (correlation coefficient r = 0.51), a comparison of their health effects was possible. Both fractions were associated with a decrease of PEF and an increase in cough and feeling ill during the day. Health effects of the 5-d mean of the number of ultrafine particles were larger than those of the mass of the fine particles. In addition, the effects of the number of the ultrafine particles on PEF were stronger than those of particulate matter smaller than 10 microm (PM10). Therefore, the present study suggests that the size distribution of ambient particles helps to elucidate the properties of ambient aerosols responsible for health effects.

1 May 2019 in Nature Genetics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ECEGG Consortium
EGG Consortium
NWNicole M. Warrington
Nicole M. Warrington
RBRobin N. Beaumont
Robin N. Beaumont
MHMomoko Horikoshi
Momoko Horikoshi
FDFelix R. Day
Felix R. Day
RFRachel M. Freathy
Rachel M. Freathy