Keith Stockmann

Dr. Keith Stockmann


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

17Years (2010-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
13 January 2012 in Carbon Balance and Management
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KSKeith Stockmann
Keith Stockmann
NANathaniel Anderson
Nathaniel Anderson
KSKenneth E Skog
Kenneth E Skog
Sean HealeySean Healey
Sean Healey
DLDan R Loeffler
Dan R Loeffler
JMJames F Morrison
James F Morrison
Global forests capture and store significant amounts of CO2 through photosynthesis. When carbon is removed from forests through harvest, a portion of the harvested carbon is stored in wood products, often for many decades. The United States Forest Service (USFS) and other agencies are interested in accurately accounting for carbon flux associated with harvested wood products (HWP) to meet greenhouse gas monitoring commitments and climate change adaptation and mitigation objectives. This paper uses the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) production accounting approach and the California Forest Project Protocol (CFPP) to estimate HWP carbon storage from 1906 to 2010 for the USFS Northern Region, which includes forests in northern Idaho, Montana, South Dakota, and eastern Washington.

17 September 2010 in International Journal of Wildland Fire
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KSKeith Stockmann
Keith Stockmann
KHKevin D. Hyde
Kevin D. Hyde
JJJ. Greg Jones
J. Greg Jones
DLDan R. Loeffler
Dan R. Loeffler
RSRobin P. Silverstein
Robin P. Silverstein
Concern over increased wildland fire threats on public lands throughout the western United States makes fuel reduction activities the primary driver of many management projects. This single-issue focus recalls a management planning process practiced frequently in recent decades – a least-harm approach where the primary objective is first addressed and then plans are modified to mitigate adverse effects to other resources. In contrast, we propose a multiple-criteria process for planning fuel-treatment projects in the context of ecosystem management. This approach is consistent with policies that require land management activities be designed to meet multiple-use and environmental objectives, while addressing administrative and budget constraints, and reconciling performance measures from multiple policy directives. We present the process borrowing from the Trapper Bunkhouse Land Stewardship Project example to show the logic for conducting an integrated assessment of ecological and natural resource issues related to multiple management scenarios. The effects and trade-offs of the no-action scenario and proposed action alternatives are evaluated relative to silviculture, disturbance processes (including fire behaviour), wildlife habitat, noxious weeds, water quality, recreation and aesthetics, and economic contributions. Advantages and challenges of this project planning approach are also discussed.

16 April 2012 in Forest Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SSStephanie A. Snyder
Stephanie A. Snyder
KSKeith Stockmann
Keith Stockmann
GMGaylord E. Morris
Gaylord E. Morris
The US Forest Service used contracted helicopter services as part of its wildfire suppression strategy. An optimization decision-modeling system was