The paper presents a comparative analysis of energy consumption by 2.2 kW electric motors of various types and energy efficiency classes in the electric drive of a pump unit with throttle control in a water supply system. Line-start permanent-magnet synchronous motors of the IE4 energy efficiency class and induction motors of the IE4 and IE3 energy efficiency classes of various manufacturers were considered (IE4 and IE3 are labels of energy efficiency classes of electric motors according to IEC 60034-30-1 standard). Energy consumption at a hydraulic load changing under a typical duty cycle was calculated based on the nameplate data of the pump and electric motors. The developed method shows that selecting an electric motor based on the IE energy efficiency class under the IEC 60034-30-1 standard (i.e., based on efficiency at a rated load) may not provide the minimum energy consumption of a variable flow pump unit over a typical duty cycle. In particular, the considered IE4 class line-start permanent-magnet synchronous motors do not provide significant advantages over IE4 class induction motors, and sometimes even over IE3 class induction motors when they are used in variable flow pump units.

The high energy intensity of the modern industry and the threat of climate change determine the high urgency of increasing the energy efficiency of electric motors. In this paper, energy consumption, energy costs, payback periods, and CO₂ emissions of 75 kW, 4 pole induction motors with direct grid supply in a fixed-speed pump unit are evaluated. Motors of the IE2, IE3, and IE4 efficiency classes according to IEC 60034-30-1 standard are compared in terms of life-time energy savings, payback period, and CO₂ emissions. To carry out the analysis, polynomial interpolation of the data from the available manufacturer datasheets of the motors is used. It concluded that even though the initial investment cost of the IE4-motor is higher than that of IE3-motor, the IE4-motor is more profitable if more than 3 years of operation are considered and also provides significant reductions of CO₂ emissions. The paper presents a calculation method of the aforementioned indicators which can be useful for companies, researchers, and engineers for quick assessment and selection of technical solutions.

This study carried out a comparative analysis of indicators of electricity consumption and CO₂ emissions for four-pole induction motors (IMs) of efficiency classes IE3 and IE4 with a rated power of 2.2–200 kW in a variable speed pump unit. In addition, innovative IE4 converter-fed synchronous reluctance motors (SynRMs) were evaluated. The comparison was derived from the manufacturer’s specifications for the power drive systems (PDSs) at various rotational speeds and loads. The results showed that the emission indicators for IE3 class motors were significantly worse compared with IE4 class motors for low power ratings, which make up the vast majority of electric motors in service. This justifies expanding the mandatory power range for IE4 motors to at least 7.5–200 kW or even 0.75–200 kW, as it will dramatically contribute to the achievement of the new ambitious goals for reducing greenhouse gas emissions. In addition, the operational advantages of IE4 SynRMs over IE4 IMs were demonstrated, such as their simpler design and manufacturing technology at a price comparable to that of IE3 IMs.

A mathematical model of thermal processes in a linear asynchronous motor based on detailed equivalent circuits is considered. It is described how this model is used to solve a number of real-world problems.

The article describes a mathematical model of a linear induction motor on the basis of detailed equivalent circuits. This model performs calculations of both electromagnetic steady-states and transients in LIM, has considerably fewer degrees of freedom than the FEM-based models, which is especially important when performing optimization calculations, designing, and analyzing dynamic modes. In this paper we investigate the effect of the numerical differentiation algorithm on the LIM calculation results on the basis of the detailed equivalent circuits models (DECM). It is shown that the use of the numerical differentiation formulas that provide a more correct result approximates significantly the DEC-based calculations to the FEM-based calculations.

Despite the great potential and the high performance of energy-efficient line-start permanent magnet synchronous motors (LSPMSMs), their developers face a great deal of difficulties, one of which is the lack of reliable and accurate testing methods for such electrical machines. In this paper, we propose a new method for indirectly determining the efficiency of LSPMSM through the summation of individual loss components. The standard input-output method usually used for these machines is based on torque measurement, requires expensive measuring equipment, and, as a rule, has great uncertainty. Contrarily, the proposed method does not require direct measurement of torque and mechanical power on the shaft and is less sensitive to measurement uncertainties. The theoretical substantiation of the proposed method and its experimental verification using a commercially available four-pole LSPMSM with a rated power of 0.55 kW are presented. Satisfactory convergence of the experimental results obtained using the standard input-output method and using the proposed indirect method is shown.