Sian de Bell

Dr. Sian de Bell

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

10Years (2017-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 August 2020 in Landscape and Urban Planning
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SBSian de Bell
Sian de Bell
MWMathew White
Mathew White
AGAlistair Griffiths
Alistair Griffiths
ADAlison Darlow
Alison Darlow
TTTimothy Taylor
Timothy Taylor
RLRebecca Lovell
Rebecca Lovell

1 November 2017 in Landscape and Urban Planning
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SBSian de Bell
Sian de Bell
HGHilary Graham
Hilary Graham
SJStuart Jarvis
Stuart Jarvis
PWPiran White
Piran White

1 December 2018 in Journal of Transport & Health
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
HGHilary Graham
Hilary Graham
SBSian de Bell
Sian de Bell
KFKate Flemming
Kate Flemming
ASAmanda Sowden
Amanda Sowden
PWPiran White
Piran White
KWKath Wright
Kath Wright

25 October 2018 in Ageing and Society
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HGHilary Graham
Hilary Graham
SBSian de Bell
Sian de Bell
KFKate Flemming
Kate Flemming
ASAmanda Sowden
Amanda Sowden
PWPiran White
Piran White
KWKath Wright
Kath Wright
Compared to younger age groups, older people spend more time in their locality and rely more heavily on its pedestrian and public transport infrastructure. Qualitative studies provide unique insight into people's experiences. We conducted a qualitative evidence synthesis of United Kingdom-based studies of older people's experiences of travelling in the urban environment. We searched health, social science, age-related and transport-related databases from 1998 to 2017. Fourteen papers (from 12 studies) were included in a thematic synthesis, a three-staged process that moves iteratively between codes, descriptive themes and cross-cutting analytical themes. Emerging themes were discussed with policy advisers. Four overarching themes were identified. The first and second theme pointed to the importance of ‘getting out’ and of being independent travellers. The third and fourth themes highlighted how local environments and travel systems enabled (or prevented) older people from realising these valued dimensions of travel. The loss of local amenities and micro-environmental features, such as pavement quality, personal safety and aesthetic appearance, were recurrent concerns. Free modes of travel like walking and bus travel were highly valued, including the social engagement they facilitated. Our review suggests that, while its extrinsic value (reaching destinations) matters, the intrinsic value of travel matters too. The process of travel is experienced and enjoyed for its own sake, with older people describing its contribution to their wellbeing.

17 January 2020 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SBSian de Bell
Sian de Bell
HGHilary Graham
Hilary Graham
PWPiran White
Piran White
The degradation of urban natural spaces reduces their ability to benefit human populations. Restoration can support urban sustainability by improving both the ecological health of these spaces and the public benefits they provide, but studies rarely combine both perspectives. We assessed the ecological and social benefits of an urban river restoration project relative to an unrestored river on the basis of the following four principles: Increasing ecological integrity; benefitting and engaging society; taking account of the past and future; and sustainability. Ecological health at each site was assessed by analyzing macroinvertebrate samples. The social benefits were measured by conducting focus groups with local users of green spaces surrounding the two rivers and comparing their responses. Restoration increased the ecological health of the river and was viewed positively by users, enhancing the river as a space to visit for psychological benefits. However, there were concerns over the erasure of the cultural heritage of the area. Our findings indicate that the long-term sustainability of restoration projects, particularly in urban areas, can be enhanced by integrating ecological and social dimensions. Although short-term ecological improvements may be small, they have the potential to provide a range of benefits for human populations.

6 June 2024 in Environment International
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SBSian de Bell
Sian de Bell
JAJulius Cesar Pintor Alejandre
Julius Cesar Pintor Alejandre
CMClaudia Menzel
Claudia Menzel
RSRita Sousa-Silva
Rita Sousa-Silva
TSTanja M. Straka
Tanja M. Straka
ABAletta Bonn
Aletta Bonn
Evidence on the health benefits of spending time in nature has highlighted the importance of provision of blue and green spaces where people live. The potential for health benefits offered by nature exposure, however, extends beyond health promotion to health treatment. Social prescribing links people with health or social care needs to community-based, non-clinical health and social care interventions to improve health and wellbeing. Nature-based social prescribing (NBSP) is a variant that uses the health-promoting benefits of activities carried out in natural environments, such as gardening and walking. Much current NBSP practice has been developed in the UK, and there is increasing global interest in its implementation. This requires interventions to be adapted for different contexts, considering the needs of populations and the structure of healthcare systems. This paper presents results from an expert group participatory workshop involving 29 practitioners, researchers, and policymakers from the UK and Germany's health and environmental sectors. Using the UK and Germany, two countries with different healthcare systems and in different developmental stages of NBSP practice, as case studies, we analysed opportunities, challenges, and facilitators for the development and implementation of NBSP. We identified five overarching themes for developing, implementing, and evaluating NBSP: Capacity Building; Accessibility and Acceptability; Networks and Collaborations; Standardised Implementation and Evaluation; and Sustainability. We also discuss key strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats for each overarching theme to understand how they could be developed to support NBSP implementation. NBSP could offer significant public health benefits using available blue and green spaces. We offer guidance on how NBSP implementation, from wider policy support to the design and evaluation of individual programmes, could be adapted to different contexts. This research could help inform the development and evaluation of NBSP programmes to support planetary health from local and global scales.