Thoracic radiotherapy increases the risk of radiation‑induced heart damage (RIHD); however, the molecular mechanisms underlying these changes are not fully understood. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effects of radiation on the mouse heart using high‑throughput proteomics. Male C57BL/6J mice were used to establish a model of RIHD by exposing the entire heart to 16 Gy high‑energy X‑rays, and cardiac injuries were verified using a cardiac echocardiogram, as well as by measuring serum brain natriuretic peptide levels and conducting H&E and Masson staining 5 months after irradiation. Proteomics experiments were performed using the heart apex of 5‑month irradiated mice and control mice that underwent sham‑irradiation. The most significantly differentially expressed proteins were enriched in 'cardiac fibrosis' and 'energy metabolism'. Next, the cardiac fibrosis and changes to energy metabolism were confirmed using immunohistochemistry staining and western blotting. Extracellular matrix proteins, such as collagen type 1 α 1 chain, collagen type III α 1 chain, vimentin and CCCTC‑binding factor, along with metabolism‑related proteins, such as fatty acid synthase and solute carrier family 25 member 1, exhibited upregulated expression following exposure to ionizing radiation. Additionally, the myocardial mitochondria inner membranes were injured, along with a decrease in ATP levels and the accumulation of lactic acid in the irradiated heart tissues. These results suggest that the high doses of ionizing radiation used lead to structural remodeling, functional injury and fibrotic alterations in the mouse heart. Radiation‑induced mitochondrial damage and metabolic alterations of the cardiac tissue may thus be a pathogenic mechanism of RIHD.

Background: Although arrhythmias have been reported in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), the association between arrhythmias and ICIs has not been thoroughly evaluated in real‐world studies. We aimed to describe the major features of ICI‐related arrhythmic events and identify the factors that contributed to death.Methods: A disproportionality analysis was performed using data from the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database from January 2011 to December 2021. Reporting odds ratios (RORs), proportional reporting ratio and information component were used to assess whether adverse arrhythmic events were associated with ICIs. The clinical characteristics of patients with ICI‐associated arrhythmias were compared with fatal and non‐fatal arrhythmias. The time to onset (TTO), fatality rates of arrhythmic events were also investigated.Results: We identified a total of 1945 cases of ICI‐related arrhythmic events. Men (64.78%) were identified significantly more frequently than women (28.84%). The median age was 68 years ([interquartile range, IQR] 60–75 years). Anti‐programmed cell death‐1 (PD‐1) and anti‐programmed cell death ligand‐1 (PD‐L1) were associated with adverse arrhythmic events, corresponding to ROR 1.11 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05–1.17) and ROR 1.34 (95% CI 1.20–1.49), respectively. However, anti‐cytotoxic T‐lymphocyte associated protein 4 or combination immunotherapy did not appear to be associated with arrhythmic events. Atrial fibrillation (N = 576, 0.62%), cardiac arrest (N = 284, 0.31%), tachycardia (N = 175, 0.19%) were the most common adverse arrhythmic events. Sudden death and complete atrioventricular block are adverse events that are significantly associated with ICI‐related arrhythmic events and have strong signal intensity. The TTO of cases that resulted in death (30 days [IQR] 11–73.75) was significantly earlier than that of cases that did not result in death (33 days [IQR 10.5–88.5], p = 0.003). ICI‐related arrhythmic events were severe with death occurring in 507 (26.07%) of 1945 arrhythmias cases.Conclusions: Treatment with PD‐1/PD‐L1 may cause arrhythmic events, which are severe and tend to occur early on during treatment. It is important to identify ICI‐related arrhythmias as early as possible, and to manage them appropriately.

Background: EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is prone to leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) after Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) treatment. Our previous study suggested that osimertinib plus bevacizumab was safe and effective in LM from EGFR-mutant NSCLC. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of osimertinib plus bevacizumab with osimertinib in EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients with LM. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the data from 27 LM patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC who received osimertinib with or without bevacizumab at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University. Next, we investigated the antitumor efficacy of osimertinib plus bevacizumab in an LM xenograft model using the H1975 (EGFR exon20 T790M and exon21 L858R) cell line. We examined the ability of osimertinib plus bevacizumab compared with osimertinib to penetrate the blood–brain barrier (BBB) and explored the potential mechanism. Results: Our retrospective study observed the improved survival of LM patients in osimertinib plus bevacizumab group. The median overall survival (OS) of the patients who received osimertinib and bevacizumab (n = 16) compared with osimertinib group (n = 11) was 18.0 months versus 13.7 months (log-rank test, p = 0.046, HR = 2.867, 95% CI 1.007–8.162). The median intracranial Progression-free Survival (iPFS) was 10.6 months versus 5.5 months (log-rank test, p = 0.037, HR = 3.401, 95% CI 1.079–10.720). In the LM xenograft model with H1975 cells, the combined treatment significantly increased the effective intracranial concentration of osimertinib, modulated the level of E-cadherin and downregulated the levels of EGFR and downstream signaling pathways including p-AKT and reduced tumor microvessel density (TMD), indicated that combined osimertinib with bevacizumab may exhibit a synergistic effect in EGFR-mutant LM model possibly by modulating the level of E-cadherin. Conclusions: Our findings indicate the potential benefit of osimertinib plus bevacizumab in LM with EGFR-mutant NSCLC, and more larger sample size research are still needed.

Background: This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and to elucidate potential mechanisms of acquired resistance. Methods: Patients with advanced NSCLC harboring positive EGFR mutations after initial TKI therapy for at least 8 weeks were eligible for SBRT between August 2016 and August 2019. Eligible patients were treated with thoracic SBRT, and TKI was continued after SBRT until it was considered ineffective. The control group was treated with TKIs monotherapy. Propensity score matching (PSM, ratio of 1:2) was used to account for differences in baseline characteristics. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), treatment safety and resistance mechanisms were evaluated. Results: Three hundred eight patients were included in the study population. Among them, 262 patients received TKIs alone, and 46 patients received TKIs with SBRT. Baseline characteristics were not significantly different between the two cohorts after PSM. The median PFS was 19.4 months in the TKIs +SBRT group compared to 13.7 months in the TKIs group (p = 0.034). An influence on OS has not yet been shown (p = 0.557). Of the 135 patients evaluated after PSM, 28 and 71 patients in the TKIs and TKIs +SBRT cohorts, respectively, had plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) next-generation sequencing (NGS) performed at baseline and disease progression. In the TKIs +SBRT cohort, the NGS results showed that T790M mutations were detected in 64.3% (18/28) of patients. Patients in the TKIs cohort exhibited fewer T790M-positive mutations (40.8%, p = 0.035) compared to patients in the TKIs +SBRT cohort. Conclusion: Real world data prove that TKIs plus thoracic SBRT significantly extend PFS with tolerable toxicity. The mutation ratio of T790M was increased in the TKIs +SBRT group compared to the TKIs only group. Further randomized studies are warranted.

Background: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) amplification refers to the copy number increase of EGFR gene, and is often identified as a “bypass” way of Epidermal growth factor receptor Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKI) resistance. We aimed to explore the effect of EGFR amplification on EGFR mutation treatment-naive advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Methods: We conducted a prospective observational study in single center, enrolling advanced non-squamous NSCLC patients receiving Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) between March 3, 2019, and February 1, 2022. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) was used to detect genetic alterations in tumor tissue samples. Progression-free survival (PFS) curves were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to evaluate factors affecting the efficacy of TKIs. Results: A total of 117 treatment-naive advanced NSCLC patients were identified in this study. EGFR amplification was found in 22 of 117 (18.8%) patients with EGFR mutations. Of 22 patients with EGFR amplification, 10 patients harbored EGFR 19 del, 11 patients with 21-L858R. The median follow-up time was 22.47 months. The median PFS of the patients with or without EGFR amplification was 8.25 months and 10.67 months, respectively (log-rank test, P = 0.63). In multivariate analysis, EGFR amplification was not an independent prognosis factor for the patients receiving first-line TKIs [HR = 1.38, 95%CI (0.73–2.58), P = 0.321]. Subgroup analysis revealed that EGFR amplification is a risk factor for progression in the brain metastasis population. [HR = 2.28, 95%CI (1.01, 5.14), P = 0.047]. Conclusion: EGFR amplification is not an independent prognosis factor for PFS in advanced non-squamous NSCLC patients receiving first-line TKIs. However, it is an independent risk factor for PFS in the brain metastasis population.