Mingkun Wei

Dr. Mingkun Wei

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

11Years (2016-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
26 June 2017 in Scientometrics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
RZRongying Zhao
Rongying Zhao
MWMingkun Wei
Mingkun Wei

4 December 2019 in Scientometrics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MWMingkun Wei
Mingkun Wei

28 December 2016 in Scientometrics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
RZRongying Zhao
Rongying Zhao
MWMingkun Wei
Mingkun Wei


1 January 2023 in College and Research Libraries
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MWMingkun Wei
Mingkun Wei
IMIsmael Mostafavi
Ismael Mostafavi
RSRussell Savage
Russell Savage
CFChangyang Feng
Changyang Feng
SMShima Moradi
Shima Moradi
This study examines the evolution of current interests and emerging characteristics in library and information science (LIS) from Chinese iSchools, including an analysis of the LIS landscape, space distribution, citation, emerging characteristics, and collaborations. This study considers a non-parametric approach to outline the structure of the iSchool movement in China, while clustering analysis helped us obtain information about the descriptions generated within unsupervised learning groups. It was found that Chinese iSchools play an intermediary role in the international development of Chinese LIS, which further promotes the dissemination and exchange of knowledge and international cooperation in LIS.

3 March 2021 in Journal of Information Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MWMingkun Wei
Mingkun Wei
QWQuan Wei
Quan Wei
SMSadhana Misra
Sadhana Misra
RSRussell Savage
Russell Savage
With the development of Web 2.0, social media dialogue has been increasingly important within the world of open access (OA), striving for more user-generated content and ease of use. In this article, we analysed the impact of OA articles published by both Chinese and the American researchers using PLOS ONE. Papers published in the same year, using citation and social media metrics, were all used to analyse the correlation between the level of social media metrics and citation. Overall, the impact of OA articles published within the United States is higher than OA articles published in China. The results showed that citations and number of Mendeley readers have a significant correlation, which reflect the similar impact in evaluation of OA articles. However, most social media metrics did not have an obvious correlation with impact evaluation, which indicates the social media metrics are useful when paired with citations, but not irreplaceable to citations. Social media metrics appear to be a useful alternative metrics to accurately reflecting the impact of OA articles within the scientific community.