Teresa Fuertes‐Mendizábal

Dr. Teresa Fuertes‐Mendizábal

Plant Biology and Ecology, Universidad el País Vasco, UPV/EHU, Leioa, Spain
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

17Years (2010-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
28 September 2020 in Biochar
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JIJim Ippolito
Jim Ippolito
LCLiqiang Cui
Liqiang Cui
CKClaudia Kammann
Claudia Kammann
NWNicole Wrage-Mönnig
Nicole Wrage-Mönnig
JEJose M. Estavillo
Jose M. Estavillo
NBNils Borchard
Nils Borchard
Various studies have established that feedstock choice, pyrolysis temperature, and pyrolysis type influence final biochar physicochemical characteristics. However, overarching analyses of pre-biochar creation choices and correlations to biochar characteristics are severely lacking. Thus, the objective of this work was to help researchers, biochar-stakeholders, and practitioners make more well-informed choices in terms of how these three major parameters influence the final biochar product. Utilizing approximately 5400 peer-reviewed journal articles and over 50,800 individual data points, herein we elucidate the selections that influence final biochar physical and chemical properties, total nutrient content, and perhaps more importantly tools one can use to predict biochar’s nutrient availability. Based on the large dataset collected, it appears that pyrolysis type (fast or slow) plays a minor role in biochar physico- (inorganic) chemical characteristics; few differences were evident between production styles. Pyrolysis temperature, however, affects biochar’s longevity, with pyrolysis temperatures > 500 °C generally leading to longer-term (i.e., > 1000 years) half-lives. Greater pyrolysis temperatures also led to biochars containing greater overall C and specific surface area (SSA), which could promote soil physico-chemical improvements. However, based on the collected data, it appears that feedstock selection has the largest influence on biochar properties. Specific surface area is greatest in wood-based biochars, which in combination with pyrolysis temperature could likely promote greater changes in soil physical characteristics over other feedstock-based biochars. Crop- and other grass-based biochars appear to have cation exchange capacities greater than other biochars, which in combination with pyrolysis temperature could potentially lead to longer-term changes in soil nutrient retention. The collected data also suggest that one can reasonably predict the availability of various biochar nutrients (e.g., N, P, K, Ca, Mg, Fe, and Cu) based on feedstock choice and total nutrient content. Results can be used to create designer biochars to help solve environmental issues and supply a variety of plant-available nutrients for crop growth.

1 February 2019 in Science of The Total Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NBNils Borchard
Nils Borchard
MSMichael Schirrmann
Michael Schirrmann
MCMaria Luz Cayuela
Maria Luz Cayuela
CKClaudia Kammann
Claudia Kammann
NWNicole Wrage-Mönnig
Nicole Wrage-Mönnig
JNJeff Novak
Jeff Novak

28 June 2017 in Journal of Environmental Engineering and Landscape Management
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CKClaudia Kammann
Claudia Kammann
JIJim Ippolito
Jim Ippolito
NHNikolas Hagemann
Nikolas Hagemann
NBNils Borchard
Nils Borchard
MCMaria Luz Cayuela
Maria Luz Cayuela
NWNicole Wrage-Mönnig
Nicole Wrage-Mönnig
Agriculture and land use change has significantly increased atmospheric emissions of the non-CO2 green-house gases (GHG) nitrous oxide (N2O) and methane (CH4). Since human nutritional and bioenergy needs continue to increase, at a shrinking global land area for production, novel land management strategies are required that reduce the GHG footprint per unit of yield. Here we review the potential of biochar to reduce N2O and CH4 emissions from agricultural practices including potential mechanisms behind observed effects. Furthermore, we investigate alternative uses of biochar in agricultural land management that may significantly reduce the GHG-emissions-per-unit-of-product footprint, such as (i) pyrolysis of manures as hygienic alternative to direct soil application, (ii) using biochar as fertilizer carrier matrix for underfoot fertilization, biochar use (iii) as composting additive or (iv) as feed additive in animal husbandry or for manure treatment. We conclude that the largest future research needs lay in conducting life-cycle GHG assessments when using biochar as an on-farm management tool for nutrient-rich biomass waste streams.

1 May 2013 in Journal of Plant Physiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ISIgor Setién
Igor Setién
Teresa Fuertes‐MendizábalTeresa Fuertes‐Mendizábal
Teresa Fuertes‐Mendizábal
AGAzucena González
Azucena González
PAPedro Mª Aparicio-Tejo
Pedro Mª Aparicio-Tejo
CGCarmen González-Murua
Carmen González-Murua
JEJosé M. Estavillo
José M. Estavillo

1 July 2010 in European Journal of Agronomy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Teresa Fuertes‐MendizábalTeresa Fuertes‐Mendizábal
Teresa Fuertes‐Mendizábal
AAA. Aizpurua
A. Aizpurua
MGMARIA BEGOÑA GONZÁLEZ-MORO
MARIA BEGOÑA GONZÁLEZ-MORO
JEJosé M. Estavillo
José M. Estavillo

1 October 2016 in European Journal of Agronomy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
XHXimena Huérfano
Ximena Huérfano
Teresa Fuertes‐MendizábalTeresa Fuertes‐Mendizábal
Teresa Fuertes‐Mendizábal
KFKevin Fernández-Diez
Kevin Fernández-Diez
JEJosé M. Estavillo
José M. Estavillo
CGCarmen González-Murua
Carmen González-Murua
SMSergio Menéndez
Sergio Menéndez