The practicability of deep learning techniques has been demonstrated by their successful implementation in varied fields, including diagnostic imaging for clinicians. In accordance with the increasing demands in the healthcare industry, techniques for automatic prediction and detection are being widely researched. Particularly in dentistry, for various reasons, automated mandibular canal detection has become highly desirable. The positioning of the inferior alveolar nerve (IAN), which is one of the major structures in the mandible, is crucial to prevent nerve injury during surgical procedures. However, automatic segmentation using Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) poses certain difficulties, such as the complex appearance of the human skull, limited number of datasets, unclear edges, and noisy images. Using work-in-progress automation software, experiments were conducted with models based on 2D SegNet, 2D and 3D U-Nets as preliminary research for a dental segmentation automation tool. The 2D U-Net with adjacent images demonstrates higher global accuracy of 0.82 than naïve U-Net variants. The 2D SegNet showed the second highest global accuracy of 0.96, and the 3D U-Net showed the best global accuracy of 0.99. The automated canal detection system through deep learning will contribute significantly to efficient treatment planning and to reducing patients’ discomfort by a dentist. This study will be a preliminary report and an opportunity to explore the application of deep learning to other dental fields.
In the absence of accurate medical records, it is critical to correctly classify implant fixture systems using periapical radiographs to provide accurate diagnoses and treatments to patients or to respond to complications. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether deep neural networks can identify four different types of implants on intraoral radiographs. In this study, images of 801 patients who underwent periapical radiographs between 2005 and 2019 at Yonsei University Dental Hospital were used. Images containing the following four types of implants were selected: Brånemark Mk TiUnite, Dentium Implantium, Straumann Bone Level, and Straumann Tissue Level. SqueezeNet, GoogLeNet, ResNet-18, MobileNet-v2, and ResNet-50 were tested to determine the optimal pre-trained network architecture. The accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score were calculated for each network using a confusion matrix. All five models showed a test accuracy exceeding 90%. SqueezeNet and MobileNet-v2, which are small networks with less than four million parameters, showed an accuracy of approximately 96% and 97%, respectively. The results of this study confirmed that convolutional neural networks can classify the four implant fixtures with high accuracy even with a relatively small network and a small number of images. This may solve the inconveniences associated with unnecessary treatments and medical expenses caused by lack of knowledge about the exact type of implant.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate and compare the performance of six state-of-the-art convolutional neural network (CNN)-based deep learning models for cervical vertebral maturation (CVM) on lateral cephalometric radiographs, and implement visualization of CVM classification for each model using gradient-weighted class activation map (Grad-CAM) technology. A total of 600 lateral cephalometric radiographs obtained from patients aged 6–19 years between 2013 and 2020 in Pusan National University Dental Hospital were used in this study. ResNet-18, MobileNet-v2, ResNet-50, ResNet-101, Inception-v3, and Inception-ResNet-v2 were tested to determine the optimal pre-trained network architecture. Multi-class classification metrics, accuracy, recall, precision, F1-score, and area under the curve (AUC) values from the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve were used to evaluate the performance of the models. All deep learning models demonstrated more than 90% accuracy, with Inception-ResNet-v2 performing the best, relatively. In addition, visualizing each deep learning model using Grad-CAM led to a primary focus on the cervical vertebrae and surrounding structures. The use of these deep learning models in clinical practice will facilitate dental practitioners in making accurate diagnoses and treatment plans.
In this study, we aimed to develop and evaluate the performance of deep-learning models that automatically classify mesiodens in primary or mixed dentition panoramic radiographs. Panoramic radiographs of 550 patients with mesiodens and 550 patients without mesiodens were used. Primary or mixed dentition patients were included. SqueezeNet, ResNet-18, ResNet-101, and Inception-ResNet-V2 were each used to create deep-learning models. The accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score of ResNet-101 and Inception-ResNet-V2 were higher than 90%. SqueezeNet exhibited relatively inferior results. In addition, we attempted to visualize the models using a class activation map. In images with mesiodens, the deep-learning models focused on the actual locations of the mesiodens in many cases. Deep-learning technologies may help clinicians with insufficient clinical experience in more accurate and faster diagnosis.
(1) Background: The accurate diagnosis of periodontal disease typically involves complex clinical and radiologic examination. However, recent studies have demonstrated the potential of deep learning in improving diagnostic accuracy and reliability through the development of computer-aided detection and diagnosis algorithms for dental problems using various radiographic sources. This study focuses on the use of panoramic radiographs, which are preferred due to their ability to assess the entire dentition with a single radiation dose. The objective is to evaluate whether panoramic radiographs are a reliable source for the detection of periodontal bone loss using deep learning, and to assess its potential for practical use on a large dataset. (2) Methods: A total of 4083 anonymized digital panoramic radiographs were collected using a Proline XC machine (Planmeca Co., Helsinki, Finland) in accordance with the research ethics protocol. These images were used to train the Faster R-CNN object detection method for detecting periodontally compromised teeth on panoramic radiographs. (3) Results: This study demonstrated a high level of consistency and reproducibility among examiners, with overall inter- and intra-examiner correlation coefficient (ICC) values of 0.94. The Area Under the Curve (AUC) for detecting periodontally compromised and healthy teeth was 0.88 each, and the overall AUC for the entire jaw, including edentulous regions, was 0.91. (4) Conclusions: The regional grouping of teeth exhibited reliable detection performance for periodontal bone loss using a large dataset, indicating the possibility of automating the diagnosis of periodontitis using panoramic radiographs.