Ezio Bartocci

Prof. Ezio Bartocci

TU Wien, Austria

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

24Years (2003-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
11 February 2018
Verified
Book Chapter
Closed access
PDF file
Ezio BartocciEzio Bartocci
Ezio Bartocci
JDJyotirmoy Deshmukh
Jyotirmoy Deshmukh
ADAlexandre Donzé
Alexandre Donzé
GFGeorgios Fainekos
Georgios Fainekos
OMOded Maler
Oded Maler
SSSriram Sankaranarayanan
Sriram Sankaranarayanan

11 February 2018
Verified
Book Chapter
Closed access
PDF file
Ezio BartocciEzio Bartocci
Ezio Bartocci
YFYliès Falcone
Yliès Falcone
AFAdrian Francalanza
Adrian Francalanza
GRGiles Reger
Giles Reger

21 January 2016 in PLOS Computational Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Ezio BartocciEzio Bartocci
Ezio Bartocci
PLPietro Lio
Pietro Lio
As the amount of biological data in the public domain grows, so does the range of modeling and analysis techniques employed in systems biology. In recent years, a number of theoretical computer science developments have enabled modeling methodology to keep pace. The growing interest in systems biology in executable models and their analysis has necessitated the borrowing of terms and methods from computer science, such as formal analysis, model checking, static analysis, and runtime verification. Here, we discuss the most important and exciting computational methods and tools currently available to systems biologists. We believe that a deeper understanding of the concepts and theory highlighted in this review will produce better software practice, improved investigation of complex biological processes, and even new ideas and better feedback into computer science.

10 January 2019 in IEEE Access
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
DRDenise Ratasich
Denise Ratasich
FKFaiq Khalid
Faiq Khalid
FGFlorian Geissler
Florian Geissler
RGRadu Grosu
Radu Grosu
MSMuhammad Shafique
Muhammad Shafique
Ezio BartocciEzio Bartocci
Ezio Bartocci

11 November 2019 in Formal Methods in System Design
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CSCésar Sánchez
César Sánchez
GSGerardo Schneider
Gerardo Schneider
WAWolfgang Ahrendt
Wolfgang Ahrendt
Ezio BartocciEzio Bartocci
Ezio Bartocci
DBDomenico Bianculli
Domenico Bianculli
AWAlexander Weiss
Alexander Weiss
Runtime verification is an area of formal methods that studies the dynamic analysis of execution traces against formal specifications. Typically, the two main activities in runtime verification efforts are the process of creating monitors from specifications, and the algorithms for the evaluation of traces against the generated monitors. Other activities involve the instrumentation of the system to generate the trace and the communication between the system under analysis and the monitor. Most of the applications in runtime verification have been focused on the dynamic analysis of software, even though there are many more potential applications to other computational devices and target systems. In this paper we present a collection of challenges for runtime verification extracted from concrete application domains, focusing on the difficulties that must be overcome to tackle these specific challenges. The computational models that characterize these domains require to devise new techniques beyond the current state of the art in runtime verification.

1 March 2009 in Communications of the ACM
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
RGRadu Grosu
Radu Grosu
SSScott A. Smolka
Scott A. Smolka
FCFlavio Corradini
Flavio Corradini
AWAnita Wasilewska
Anita Wasilewska
EEEmilia Entcheva
Emilia Entcheva
Ezio BartocciEzio Bartocci
Ezio Bartocci
We address the problem of specifying and detecting emergent behavior in networks of cardiac myocytes, spiral electric waves in particular, a precursor to atrial and ventricular fibrillation. To solve this problem we: (1) apply discrete mode abstraction to the cycle-linear hybrid automata (CLHA) we have recently developed for modeling the behavior of myocyte networks; (2) introduce the new concept of spatial superposition of CLHA modes; (3) develop a new spatial logic, based on spatial superposition, for specifying emergent behavior; (4) devise a new method for learning the formulae of this logic from the spatial patterns under investigation; and (5) apply bounded model checking to detect the onset of spiral waves. We have implemented our methodology as the EMERALD tool suite, a component of our EHA framework for specification, simulation, analysis, and control of excitable hybrid automata. We illustrate the effectiveness of our approach by applying EMERALD to the scalar electrical fields produced by our CELLEXCITE simulation environment for excitable-cell networks.