Kuang-Lin Lin

Dr. Kuang-Lin Lin

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

24Years (2003-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 May 2019 in Brain and Development
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SLShih-Yun Lan
Shih-Yun Lan
CKCheng-Yen Kuo
Cheng-Yen Kuo
CCCheng-Che Chou
Cheng-Che Chou
SKShu-Sing Kong
Shu-Sing Kong
PHPo-Cheng Hung
Po-Cheng Hung
KLKuang-Lin Lin
Kuang-Lin Lin

2 September 2009 in Child's Nervous System
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
BTBih-Yu Tsai
Bih-Yu Tsai
KLKuang-Lin Lin
Kuang-Lin Lin
TLTzou-Yien Lin
Tzou-Yien Lin
CCCheng-Hsun Chiu
Cheng-Hsun Chiu
WLWen-Jane Lee
Wen-Jane Lee
HWHuei-Shyong Wang
Huei-Shyong Wang

1 June 2020 in Biomedical Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JLJainn-Jim Lin
Jainn-Jim Lin
ACAaron E. Chen
Aaron E. Chen
ELElaina E. Lin
Elaina E. Lin
SHShao-Hsuan Hsia
Shao-Hsuan Hsia
MCMing-Chou Chiang
Ming-Chou Chiang
KLKuang-Lin Lin
Kuang-Lin Lin
The rapid diagnosis of increased intracranial pressure is urgently needed for therapeutic reasons in neurocritically ill children, however this can rarely be achieved without invasive procedures. Point-of-care ultrasound of the optic nerve sheath diameter has been proposed as a non-invasive and reliable means to detect increased intracranial pressure in adults. Accordingly, clinicians may be able to use this technique to initiate early treatment and monitor the effectiveness of treatment in conjunction with other clinical examination and diagnostic modalities. Two meta-analyses and a systematic review have been published on this topic in adults. However, data on the correlation between optic nerve sheath diameter and intracranial pressure in neurocritically ill children are scarce. The aim of this review was to briefly describe what is being measured with point-of-care ultrasound of the optic nerve sheath diameter, summarize the most recent findings from adult literature, and provide an update of current work in children.

31 December 2014 in Pediatric Neurology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JLJainn-Jim Lin
Jainn-Jim Lin
KLKuang-Lin Lin
Kuang-Lin Lin
OCOi-Wa Chan
Oi-Wa Chan
SHShao-Hsuan Hsia
Shao-Hsuan Hsia
HWHuei-Shyong Wang
Huei-Shyong Wang

1 October 2016 in Pediatrics & Neonatology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SLShih-Yun Lan
Shih-Yun Lan
JLJainn-Jim Lin
Jainn-Jim Lin
SHShao-Hsuan Hsia
Shao-Hsuan Hsia
HWHuei-Shyong Wang
Huei-Shyong Wang
CCCheng-Hsun Chiu
Cheng-Hsun Chiu
KLKuang-Lin Lin
Kuang-Lin Lin
Acute pediatric encephalitis with fulminant cerebral edema can rapidly become fatal or result in devastating neurological sequelae. All cases coded with the discharge diagnosis of acute encephalitis between January 2000 and December 2010 were reviewed. Of the 1038 children with acute pediatric encephalitis, 25 were enrolled in our study with ages ranging from 5 months to 16 years. The major neurological symptoms included an altered level of consciousness (72%), vomiting (60%), and headache (48%). The onset of neurological symptoms to signs of brain herniation ranged from 0 days to 9 days. Nineteen (76%) patients had a seizure 24-48 hours prior to showing signs of fulminant cerebral edema, and 12 (48%) patients developed status epilepticus. Sixteen patients died, and no survivors returned to baseline. Risk factors for seizures and status epilepticus were compared between the fulminant cerebral edema group (n = 25, 19 seizures, including 12 status epilepticus) and control group (nonfulminant cerebral edema) (n = 1013, 444 seizures, including 141 status epilepticus; p = 0.001 for seizures and p < 0.001 for status epilepticus). Our findings indicate that preceding seizures and status epilepticus are significant risk factors for fulminant cerebral edema in children with acute encephalitis.

1 August 2019 in Pediatrics & Neonatology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SKShu-Sing Kong
Shu-Sing Kong
YCYun-Ju Chen
Yun-Ju Chen
ISI-Chen Su
I-Chen Su
JLJainn-Jim Lin
Jainn-Jim Lin
ICI-Jun Chou
I-Jun Chou
KLKuang-Lin Lin
Kuang-Lin Lin
Anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor encephalitis is an anti-neuronal antibody-mediated inflammatory brain disease that causes severe psychiatric and neurological deficits in previously healthy patients. The aims of this study were to demonstrate the clinical characteristics of patients diagnosed with anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis and to compare the different treatment strategies among these patients. Patients presenting with newly acquired psychiatric and/or neurological deficits were studied retrospectively from 2009 to 2017. Patients with evidence of anti-NMDA receptor antibodies in serum and/or cerebrospinal fluid were enrolled. The modified Rankin scale was used to assess the initial status and outcomes of the enrolled patients. Details of the clinical presentations and results of investigations were analyzed. All (n = 24) of the patients received first-line immunotherapy (steroids, and/or intravenous immunoglobulin, and/or plasma exchange), and 14 patients received second-line immunotherapy (rituximab and/or cyclophosphamide). The mean time between the first- and second-line treatment was 13 days. During the first 6 months, 20 patients (20/24, 83%) achieved a good outcome (modified Rankin Scale score ≤2) and 15 patients (15/24, 62.5%) completely recovered. Four patients (17.7%) relapsed, and three patients (12.5%) had associated tumors. Immunotherapy is an effective treatment for anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis. Rituximab and/or cyclophosphamide are treatment options for those who cannot tolerate or do not respond to first-line immunotherapy. Prospective studies are necessary to investigate the role of rituximab and cyclophosphamide in anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis.