Maria J Vilar

Dr. Maria J Vilar

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

20Years (2007-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2012 in Veterinary Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MSMeritxell Simon-Grifé
Meritxell Simon-Grifé
GMGerard E Martín-Valls
Gerard E Martín-Valls
MVMaria J Vilar
Maria J Vilar
NBNúria Busquets
Núria Busquets
MMMercedes Mora-Salvatierra
Mercedes Mora-Salvatierra
JCJordi M. Casal
Jordi M. Casal
In order to assess the dynamics of influenza virus infection in pigs, serological and virological follow-ups were conducted in two whole batches of pigs from two different farms (F1 and F2), from 3 weeks of age until market age. Anti-swine influenza virus (SIV) antibodies (measured by ELISA and hemagglutination inhibition) and nasal virus shedding (measured by RRT-PCR and isolation in embryonated chicken eggs and MDCK cells) were carried out periodically. SIV isolates were subtyped and hemagglutinin and neuraminidase genes were partially sequenced and analyzed phylogenetically. In F1, four waves of viral circulation were detected, and globally, 62/121 pigs (51.2%) were positive by RRT-PCR at least once. All F1 isolates corresponded to H1N1 subtype although hemagglutination inhibition results also revealed the presence of antibodies against H3N2. The first viral wave took place in the presence of colostral-derived antibodies. Nine pigs were positive in two non-consecutive sampling weeks, with two of the animals being positive with the same isolate. Phylogenetic analyses showed that different H1N1 variants circulated in that farm. In F2, only one isolate, H1N2, was detected and all infections were concentrated in a very short period of time, as assumed for a classic influenza outbreak. These findings led us to propose that influenza virus infection in pigs might present different patterns, from an epidemic outbreak to an endemic form with different waves of infections with a lower incidence.

1 April 2011 in Veterinary Microbiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MSM. Simon-Grifé
M. Simon-Grifé
GMG.E. Martín-Valls
G.E. Martín-Valls
MVMaria J Vilar
Maria J Vilar
IGIgnacio García-Bocanegra
Ignacio García-Bocanegra
MMM. Mora
M. Mora
JCJ. Casal
J. Casal

1 June 2013 in Preventive Veterinary Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MSM. Simon-Grifé
M. Simon-Grifé
GMG.E. Martín-Valls
G.E. Martín-Valls
MVMaria J Vilar
Maria J Vilar
IGIgnacio García-Bocanegra
Ignacio García-Bocanegra
MMMarga Martín
Marga Martín
JCJ. Casal
J. Casal

1 August 2020 in The Veterinary Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MVMaria J Vilar
Maria J Vilar
PRP.J. Rajala-Schultz
P.J. Rajala-Schultz
The cessation of milking at the end of lactation is a routine management practice in dairy herds, and the importance of the dry period for milk production and udder health, has long been recognized. Among countries and herds, drying-off practices differ and include various milk cessation methods, such as changes in milking frequency and in feeding, the use of antibiotic dry cow therapy and teat sealants, and changes in housing. Published studies reporting methods of stopping milk production are scarce, and there are no uniform recommendations on optimal procedures to dry cows off for good udder health, cow welfare, and milk production. This review describes methods to stop mik production to prepare cows for the dry period and their effects on mammary involution, udder health, and dairy cow welfare. Milk yield at dry-off (the final milking at the end of lactation) is important for rapid involution, which stimulates the immune system and promotes good udder health and cow welfare. Based on the findings of this review, gradual cessation of milking over several days before the final milking can effectively reduce milk yield at dry-off and accelerate mammary gland involution while maximizing cow comfort and welfare. Data from this review indicate a target production level of 15 kg/day of milk or less at dry-off.

1 November 2007 in Journal of Dairy Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MVMaria J Vilar
Maria J Vilar
EYE. Yus
E. Yus
MSM.L. Sanjuán
M.L. Sanjuán
FDFrancisco Javier Dieguez
Francisco Javier Dieguez
JRJ.L. Rodríguez-Otero
J.L. Rodríguez-Otero
This cross-sectional study determined the prevalence of Listeria spp. in bulk-tank milk on dairy farms in the region of Galicia in northwest Spain. The aim was to identify management practices associated with the presence of Listeria spp. and possible effects on milk hygienic quality. A total of 98 farms was randomly selected on the basis of an expected prevalence of 6.5% for Listeria monocytogenes from 20,107 dairy farms in the region. Bulk-tank milk samples were obtained from 98 farms, fecal samples from lactating cows from 97 farms, and silage samples from 83 farms. Listeria monocytogenes was detected in 6.1, 9.3, and 6.0% of these samples, respectively. Statistical analyses confirmed the relationship between low silage quality (as indicated by high pH) and presence of Listeria spp. in silage (29.5 vs. 6.2% for pH above or below 4.5, respectively). Only milking system [tie-stall systems (28.6%) vs. parlor milking (10%)] and inadequately controlled milking order [yes (32.0%) vs. no (10.7%)] had statistically significant effects on management practices for increasing the risk of Listeria contamination of bulk-tank milk.

1 July 2008 in International Journal of Food Microbiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MVMaria J Vilar
Maria J Vilar
JRJ.L. Rodríguez-Otero
J.L. Rodríguez-Otero
FDFrancisco Javier Dieguez
Francisco Javier Dieguez
MSM.L. Sanjuán
M.L. Sanjuán
EYE. Yus
E. Yus