Nathaniel Hathaway

Dr. Nathaniel Hathaway

The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, United State
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

10Years (2017-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
7 July 2020 in Nucleic Acids Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
ASAleksandra Skrajna
Aleksandra Skrajna
DGDennis Goldfarb
Dennis Goldfarb
KKKatarzyna M Kedziora
Katarzyna M Kedziora
ECEmily M Cousins
Emily M Cousins
GGGavin D Grant
Gavin D Grant
RMRobert K McGinty
Robert K McGinty
Nuclear proteins bind chromatin to execute and regulate genome-templated processes. While studies of individual nucleosome interactions have suggested that an acidic patch on the nucleosome disk may be a common site for recruitment to chromatin, the pervasiveness of acidic patch binding and whether other nucleosome binding hot-spots exist remain unclear. Here, we use nucleosome affinity proteomics with a library of nucleosomes that disrupts all exposed histone surfaces to comprehensively assess how proteins recognize nucleosomes. We find that the acidic patch and two adjacent surfaces are the primary hot-spots for nucleosome disk interactions, whereas nearly half of the nucleosome disk participates only minimally in protein binding. Our screen defines nucleosome surface requirements of nearly 300 nucleosome interacting proteins implicated in diverse nuclear processes including transcription, DNA damage repair, cell cycle regulation and nuclear architecture. Building from our screen, we demonstrate that the Anaphase-Promoting Complex/Cyclosome directly engages the acidic patch, and we elucidate a redundant mechanism of acidic patch binding by nuclear pore protein ELYS. Overall, our interactome screen illuminates a highly competitive nucleosome binding hub and establishes universal principles of nucleosome recognition.

11 November 2019 in Nature Biotechnology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ACAnna Chiarella
Anna Chiarella
KBKyle V. Butler
Kyle V. Butler
BGBerkley Gryder
Berkley Gryder
DLDongbo Lu
Dongbo Lu
TWTiffany A. Wang
Tiffany A. Wang
NHNathaniel Hathaway
Nathaniel Hathaway

18 March 2019 in Scientific Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
VKVerjine Khodaverdian
Verjine Khodaverdian
STSubhasish Tapadar
Subhasish Tapadar
IMIan MacDonald
Ian MacDonald
YXYuan Xu
Yuan Xu
PHPo-Yi Ho
Po-Yi Ho
Adegboyega OyelereAdegboyega Oyelere
Adegboyega Oyelere
Deferiprone (DFP) is a hydroxypyridinone-derived iron chelator currently in clinical use for iron chelation therapy. DFP has also been known to elicit antiproliferative activities, yet the mechanism of this effect has remained elusive. We herein report that DFP chelates the Fe2+ion at the active sites of selected iron-dependent histone lysine demethylases (KDMs), resulting in pan inhibition of a subfamily of KDMs. Specifically, DFP inhibits the demethylase activities of six KDMs - 2A, 2B, 5C, 6A, 7A and 7B - with low micromolar IC50s while considerably less active or inactive against eleven KDMs - 1A, 3A, 3B, 4A-E, 5A, 5B and 6B. The KDM that is most sensitive to DFP, KDM6A, has an IC50that is between 7- and 70-fold lower than the iron binding equivalence concentrations at which DFP inhibits ribonucleotide reductase (RNR) activities and/or reduces the labile intracellular zinc ion pool. In breast cancer cell lines, DFP potently inhibits the demethylation of H3K4me3 and H3K27me3, two chromatin posttranslational marks that are subject to removal by several KDM subfamilies which are inhibited by DFP in cell-free assay. These data strongly suggest that DFP derives its anti-proliferative activity largely from the inhibition of a sub-set of KDMs. The docked poses adopted by DFP at the KDM active sites enabled identification of new DFP-based KDM inhibitors which are more cytotoxic to cancer cell lines. We also found that a cohort of these agents inhibited HP1-mediated gene silencing and one lead compound potently inhibited breast tumor growth in murine xenograft models. Overall, this study identified a new chemical scaffold capable of inhibiting KDM enzymes, globally changing histone modification profiles, and with specific anti-tumor activities.

6 August 2019 in PLOS Pathogens
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
VMVictoria J. Madigan
Victoria J. Madigan
JYJulianne A. Yuziuk
Julianne A. Yuziuk
ACAnna Chiarella
Anna Chiarella
TTTyne O. Tyson
Tyne O. Tyson
RMRita M. Meganck
Rita M. Meganck
AAAravind Asokan
Aravind Asokan
Adeno-associated viruses (AAV) are Dependoparvoviruses that have shown promise as recombinant vectors for gene therapy. While infectious pathways of AAV are well studied, gaps remain in our understanding of host factors affecting vector genome expression. Here, we map the role of ring finger protein 121 (RNF121), an E3 ubiquitin ligase, as a key regulator of AAV genome transcription. CRISPR-mediated knockout of RNF121 (RNF121 KO) in different cells markedly decreased AAV transduction regardless of capsid serotype or vector dose. Recombinant AAV transduction is partially rescued by overexpressing RNF121, but not by co-infection with helper Adenovirus. Major steps in the AAV infectious pathway including cell surface binding, cellular uptake, nuclear entry, capsid uncoating and second strand synthesis are unaffected. While gene expression from transfected plasmids or AAV genomes is unaffected, mRNA synthesis from AAV capsid-associated genomes is markedly decreased in RNF121 KO cells. These observations were attributed to transcriptional arrest as corroborated by RNAPol-ChIP and mRNA half-life measurements. Although AAV capsid proteins do not appear to be direct substrates of RNF121, the catalytic domain of the E3 ligase appears essential. Inhibition of ubiquitin-proteasome pathways revealed that blocking Valosin Containing Protein (VCP/p97), which targets substrates to the proteasome, can selectively and completely restore AAV-mediated transgene expression in RNF121 KO cells. Expanding on this finding, transcriptomic and proteomic analysis revealed that the catalytic subunit of DNA PK (DNAPK-Cs), a known activator of VCP, is upregulated in RNF121 KO cells and that the DNA damage machinery is enriched at sites of stalled AAV genome transcription. We postulate that a network of RNF121, VCP and DNA damage response elements function together to regulate transcriptional silencing and/or activation of AAV vector genomes. Recombinant AAV vectors are at the forefront of clinical gene therapy. There is a need to better understand the mechanisms dictating AAV transduction in the host. Here, we identify a network of host proteins involving RNF121, p97 and the DNA damage machinery as potent factors regulating AAV genome transcription. Our study sheds light on an understudied aspect of AAV biology with implications for gene therapy.

7 November 2017 in ACS Synthetic Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KBKyle V. Butler
Kyle V. Butler
ACAnna Chiarella
Anna Chiarella
JJJian Jin
Jian Jin
NHNathaniel Hathaway
Nathaniel Hathaway

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ACAnna Chiarella
Anna Chiarella
DLDongbo Lu
Dongbo Lu
NHNathaniel Hathaway
Nathaniel Hathaway
Proper regulation of the chromatin landscape is essential for maintaining eukaryotic cell identity and diverse cellular processes. The importance of the epigenome comes, in part, from the ability to influence gene expression through patterns in DNA methylation, histone tail modification, and chromatin architecture. Decades of research have associated this process of chromatin regulation and gene expression with human diseased states. With the goal of understanding how chromatin dysregulation contributes to disease, as well as preventing or reversing this type of dysregulation, a multidisciplinary effort has been launched to control the epigenome. Chemicals that alter the epigenome have been used in labs and in clinics since the 1970s, but more recently there has been a shift in this effort towards manipulating the chromatin landscape in a locus-specific manner. This review will provide an overview of chromatin biology to set the stage for the type of control being discussed, evaluate the recent technological advances made in controlling specific regions of chromatin, and consider the translational applications of these works.