Likely owing to good collaterals, a sizeable fraction of patients with acute stroke and large vessel occlusion (LVO) present with only mild neurological deficit. Although intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) is standard-of-care in patients with minor but disabling stroke and LVO,
1 the substantial risk of early neurological deterioration (END) and poor 3-month outcome has been repeatedly underlined.
2-4 Given that END is rarely due to intracranial hemorrhage in this population, it is presumed to be of ischemic origin (END
i) in most patients, yet the precise underlying mechanisms are incompletely deciphered.
2,5 Considering the strong association between lack of recanalization and END
i in unselected stroke populations,
6,7 bridging therapy (ie, IVT followed by mechanical thrombectomy [MT]) may be an attractive option for patients with minor stroke and high END
i risk. However, although bridging therapy is currently recommended in patients with nonminor LVO eligible for IVT (ie, with National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale [NIHSS] score greater than 5), whether it is superior to IVT alone in those with minor stroke and LVO is unknown because few such patients were enrolled in the pivotal thrombectomy trials.
8