The morphogenesis and budding of virus particles represent an important stage in the life cycle of viruses. For Ebola virus, this process is driven by its major matrix protein, VP40. Like the matrix proteins of many other nonsegmented, negative-strand RNA viruses, VP40 has been demonstrated to oligomerize and to occur in at least two distinct oligomeric states: hexamers and octamers, which are composed of antiparallel dimers. While it has been shown that VP40 oligomers are essential for the viral life cycle, their function is completely unknown. Here we have identified two amino acids essential for oligomerization of VP40, the mutation of which blocked virus-like particle production. Consistent with this observation, oligomerization-deficient VP40 also showed impaired intracellular transport to budding sites and reduced binding to cellular membranes. However, other biological functions, such as the interaction of VP40 with the nucleoprotein, NP, remained undisturbed. Furthermore, both wild-type VP40 and oligomerization-deficient VP40 were found to negatively regulate viral genome replication, a novel function of VP40, which we have recently reported. Interestingly, while wild-type VP40 was also able to negatively regulate viral genome transcription, oligomerization-deficient VP40 was no longer able to fulfill this function, indicating that regulation of viral replication and transcription by VP40 are mechanistically distinct processes. These data indicate that VP40 oligomerization not only is a prerequisite for intracellular transport of VP40 and efficient membrane binding, and as a consequence virion morphogenesis, but also plays a critical role in the regulation of viral transcription by VP40.

Ebola virus is a non-segmented negative-sense RNA virus causing severe hemorrhagic fever with high fatality rates in humans and nonhuman primates. For transcription of the viral genome four viral proteins are essential: the nucleoprotein NP, the polymerase L, the polymerase cofactor VP35, and VP30. VP30 represents an essential Ebola virus-specific transcription factor whose activity is regulated via its phosphorylation state. In contrast to viral transcription, VP30 is not required for viral replication. Using a minigenome assay, we show that phosphorylation of VP30 inhibits viral transcription while viral replication is increased. Concurrently, phosphorylation of VP30 reciprocally regulates a newly described interaction of VP30 with VP35, and strengthens the interaction with NP. Our results indicate a critical role of VP30 phosphorylation for viral transcription and replication, suggesting a mechanism by which VP30 phosphorylation modulates the composition of the viral polymerase complex presumably forming a transcriptase in the presence of non-phosphorylated VP30 or a replicase in the presence of phosphorylated VP30.

Matrix protein VP40 of Ebola virus is essential for virus assembly and budding. Monomeric VP40 can oligomerize in vitro into RNA binding octamers, and the crystal structure of octameric VP40 has revealed that residues Phe125 and Arg134 are the most important residues for the coordination of a short single-stranded RNA. Here we show that full-length wild-type VP40 octamers bind RNA upon HEK 293 cell expression. While the Phe125-to-Ala mutation resulted in reduced RNA binding, the Arg134-to-Ala mutation completely abolished RNA binding and thus octamer formation. The absence of octamer formation, however, does not affect virus-like particle (VLP) formation, as the VLPs generated from the expression of wild-type VP40 and mutated VP40 in HEK 293 cells showed similar morphology and abundance and no significant difference in size. These results strongly indicate that octameric VP40 is dispensable for VLP formation. The cellular localization of mutant VP40 was different from that of wild-type VP40. While wild-type VP40 was present in small patches predominantly at the plasma membrane, the octamer-negative mutants were found in larger aggregates at the periphery of the cell and in the perinuclear region. We next introduced the Arg134-to-Ala and/or the Phe125-to-Ala mutation into the Ebola virus genome. Recombinant wild-type virus and virus expressing the VP40 Phe125-to-Ala mutation were both rescued. In contrast, no recombinant virus expressing the VP40 Arg134-to-Ala mutation could be recovered. These results suggest that RNA binding of VP40 and therefore octamer formation are essential for the Ebola virus life cycle.

The Marburg virus (MARV) envelope consists of a lipid membrane and two major proteins, the matrix protein VP40 and the glycoprotein GP. Both proteins use different intracellular transport pathways: GP utilizes the exocytotic pathway, while VP40 is transported through the retrograde late endosomal pathway. It is currently unknown where the proteins combine to form the viral envelope. In the present study, we identified the intracellular site where the two major envelope proteins of MARV come together as peripheral multivesicular bodies (MVBs). Upon coexpression with VP40, GP is redistributed from the trans-Golgi network into the VP40-containing MVBs. Ultrastructural analysis of MVBs suggested that they provide the platform for the formation of membrane structures that bud as virus-like particles from the cell surface. The virus-like particles contain both VP40 and GP. Single expression of GP also resulted in the release of particles, which are round or pleomorphic. Single expression of VP40 led to the release of filamentous structures that closely resemble viral particles and contain traces of endosomal marker proteins. This finding indicated a central role of VP40 in the formation of the filamentous structure of MARV particles, which is similar to the role of the related Ebola virusVP40. In MARV-infected cells, VP40 and GP are colocalized in peripheral MVBs as well. Moreover, intracellular budding of progeny virions into MVBs was frequently detected. Taken together, these results demonstrate an intracellular intersection between GP and VP40 pathways and suggest a crucial role of the late endosomal compartment for the formation of the viral envelope.

Transport of large viral nucleocapsids from replication centers to assembly sites requires contributions from the host cytoskeleton via cellular adaptor and motor proteins. For the Marburg and Ebola viruses, related viruses that cause severe hemorrhagic fevers, the mechanism of nucleocapsid transport remains poorly understood. Here we developed and used live-cell imaging of fluorescently labeled viral and host proteins to characterize the dynamics and molecular requirements of nucleocapsid transport in Marburg virus-infected cells under biosafety level 4 conditions. The study showed a complex actin-based transport of nucleocapsids over long distances from the viral replication centers to the budding sites. Only after the nucleocapsids had associated with the matrix viral protein VP40 at the plasma membrane were they recruited into filopodia and cotransported with host motor myosin 10 toward the budding sites at the tip or side of the long cellular protrusions. Three different transport modes and velocities were identified: ( i ) Along actin filaments in the cytosol, nucleocapsids were transported at ∼200 nm/s; ( ii ) nucleocapsids migrated from one actin filament to another at ∼400 nm/s; and ( iii ) VP40-associated nucleocapsids moved inside filopodia at 100 nm/s. Unique insights into the spatiotemporal dynamics of nucleocapsids and their interaction with the cytoskeleton and motor proteins can lead to novel classes of antivirals that interfere with the trafficking and subsequent release of the Marburg virus from infected cells.