Despite the use of modern immunochemotherapy regimens, a significant proportion of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients will relapse. We proposed absolute lymphocyte count/absolute monocyte count ratio (ALC/AMC ratio) as a new prognostic factor in relapsed or primary refractory DLBCL.

The prognostic value of lysine-specific demethylase 1 (LSD1) overexpression in various cancers has been investigated by many studies with inconsistent results. A meta-analysis was performed to assess the association between LSD1 and overall survival (OS) in cancer patients. Eligible studies were identified by searching the online databases PubMed and China National Knowledge Infrastructure up to February 2015. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to clarify the correlation between LSD1 expression and prognosis of different cancers. In total, nine studies with 1,149 cancer patients were included for final analysis. The meta-analysis suggested that LSD1 overexpression was associated with poor OS in cancer patients (HR =1.80, 95% CI: 1.39–2.34, P=0.000). Subgroup analysis by ethnicity, cancer type and HR estimate also showed that high levels of LSD1 were significantly correlated with OS. The meta-analysis showed that LSD1 overexpression may be associated with a worse prognosis in cancer patients.

Lack of Association Between Interleukin-8-251 T>A Polymorphism and Colorectal Cancer Risk: a Meta-analysis based on 3,019 Cases and 3,984 Controls Colorectal cancer;polymorphism;meta-analysis;interleukin-8; Purpose: The results of recent published studies focusing on IL-8 polymorphism in colorectal cancer susceptibility have often been inconsistent. We therefore carried out a meta-analysis based on independent studies to assess the association. Methods: Nine case-control studies with 7,003 individuals (3,019 cases and 3,984 controls) were included in this meta-analysis through searching the databases of PubMed, Excerpta Medica Database (EMBASE), and Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM; Chinese) (up to Aug 1st, 2012). The odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (95%CI) were used to assess the strength of the association. Meta-analysis was conducted in a fixed/random effect model. Results: No obvious associations were found for all genetic models when all studies were pooled into the meta-analysis (for A vs. T: OR = 1.084, 95% CI = 0.971-1.209, P = 0.019; for TA vs. TT: OR = 1.18, 95% CI = 0.943-1.475, P = 0.001; for AA vs. TT: OR = 1.155, 95% CI = 0.916-1.456, P = 0.014; for AA+TA vs. TT: OR = 1.170, 95% CI =0.953-1.437, P = 0.001; for AA vs. TT+TA: OR = 1.044, 95% CI = 0.886-1.230, P = 0.097). In the subgroup analyses by ethnicity (Caucasian) and source of controls (population based), also no significant associations were found for all genetic models. Conclusions: Result suggests that the IL-8-251T>A polymorphism is not associated with colorectal cancer risk. Because of the limitations of this meta-analysis, this finding demands further investigation.

The vitamin D receptor (VDR) is a crucial mediator for the cellular effects of vitamin D. A great number of studies regarding the association between BsmI polymorphism in the VDR gene and breast cancer have been published. However, the results have been contradicting. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to re-examine the controversy. Published literatures from PubMed, Embase, and Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM) were searched (updated to July 10, 2013). The principal outcome measure was the odds ratio (OR) with 95 % confidence interval (CI) for breast cancer risk associated with VDR BsmI polymorphism. With all studies involved, the meta-analysis results suggest no statistically significant association between VDR BsmI polymorphism and breast cancer risk (B vs. b, OR = 0.922, 95 % CI = 0.836–1.018, P = 0.108, I ² = 80.0 %; BB vs. bb, OR = 0.843, 95 % CI = 0.697–1.021, P = 1.75, I ² = 75.5 %; Bb vs. bb, OR = 0.930, 95 % CI = 0.814–1.063, P = 0.31, I ² = 73.1 %; BB+Bb vs. bb, OR = 0.906, 95 % CI = 0.787–1.043, P = 1.37, I ² = 78.7 %; BB vs. bb+Bb, OR = 0.899, 95 % CI = 0.786–1.028, P = 1.56, I ² = 61.0 %). The results were not changed when studies were stratified by ethnicity or source of controls. This meta-analysis suggested that there were no associations between VDR BsmI polymorphism and breast cancer.

Purpose: Previous studies investigating the association between interleukin-17A (IL-17A) G197A polymorphism and gastric cancer risk have provided inconsistent results. We, therefore, conducted this meta-analysis to clarify the association between IL-17A G197A polymorphism and gastric cancer risk. Methods: We searched PubMed, Excerpta Medica Database, and CNKI databases to identify relevant studies up to June 10, 2017. A total of 16 case-control studies including 6,624 cases and 7,631 controls were identified. Results: Overall, significant associations between IL-17A G197A polymorphism and gastric cancer risk were observed (A vs G: OR =1.24, 95% CI =1.14–1.36; AA vs GG: OR =1.63, 95% CI =1.35–1.96; GA vs GG: OR =1.12, 95% CI =1.01–1.25; AA+GA vs GG: OR =1.23, 95% CI =1.11–1.35; AA vs GA+GG: OR =1.54, 95% CI =1.27–1.87). Similar associations were also observed in Asian population (A vs G: OR =1.25, 95% CI =1.15–1.37; AA vs GG: OR =1.62, 95% CI =1.33–1.97; GA vs GG: OR =1.16, 95% CI =1.07–1.25; AA+GA vs GG: OR =1.24, 95% CI =1.15–1.33; AA vs GA+GG: OR =1.51, 95% CI =1.23–1.85), in Caucasian population (AA vs GA+GG: OR =2.19, 95% CI =1.40–3.44), and in the hospital-based controls’ subgroup (A vs G: OR =1.30, 95% CI =1.17–1.45; AA vs GG: OR =1.81, 95% CI =1.46–2.25; AA+GA vs GG: OR =1.27, 95% CI =1.12–1.43; AA vs GA+GG: OR =1.71, 95% CI =1.34–2.18). Conclusions: The current meta-analysis suggests that IL-17A G197A polymorphism might enhance gastric cancer risk.