Chao Li

Chao Li


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

13Years (2014-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
9 May 2022 in JAMA Internal Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TCTao Chen
Tao Chen
FSFang Shao
Fang Shao
KCKangyu Chen
Kangyu Chen
YWYang Wang
Yang Wang
ZWZhenqiang Wu
Zhenqiang Wu
ZJZhixin Jiang
Zhixin Jiang
Although there are conflicting guideline recommendations for the control of blood pressure (BP), evidence from a meta-analysis of 4 trials in patients with hypertension 65 years and older has shown that intensive BP control could reduce the risk of cardiovascular events.1 This was supported by another 2 meta-analyses demonstrating that a lower systolic BP was associated with better cardiovascular outcomes across all age groups.2,3 More recently, results of patients aged 60 to 80 years from the STEP (Strategy of Blood Pressure Intervention in the Elderly Hypertensive Patients) trial indicated that intensive treatment to target a systolic BP of 110 to 130 mm Hg reduced the risk of cardiovascular events compared with standard treatment with a target of 130 to 150 mm Hg.4

3 July 2019 in JAMA Network Open
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TCTao Chen
Tao Chen
CLChao Li
Chao Li
RQRui Qin
Rui Qin
YWYang Wang
Yang Wang
DYDahai Yu
Dahai Yu
VCVictoria Cornelius
Victoria Cornelius
Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) have a crucial role in assessing the efficacy and safety of a treatment and in advancing medical knowledge.1 Clinical trials of investigational medicinal products have been legally required to be registered before participant enrollment since January 5, 2004; furthermore, to improve transparency of results, the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors member journals have required since January 7, 2005, that for publication clinical trials of any intervention should be preregistered.2 Registering a trial is mostly free, and options include ClinicalTrials.gov, EU Clinical Trials Register, and International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number (ISRCTN) register. Although the reported information differs between registries, a clearly defined and prespecified primary outcome is an important element.3,4 Discrepancies between registered and published outcomes may imply selective outcome reporting based on significant P values.5,6 This practice could threaten the validity of clinical trials by producing conclusions that may mislead physicians and policy makers.6-8

29 November 2021 in Nutrients
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ZLZengbin Li
Zengbin Li
GZGuixian Zhu
Guixian Zhu
CLChao Li
Chao Li
HLHao Lai
Hao Lai
Xin LiuXin Liu
Xin Liu
LZLei Zhang
Lei Zhang
Acute diarrhea is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in children under five. Probiotics are beneficial for treating acute diarrhea in children, but unclear which specific probiotic is the most effective. We performed a Bayesian network meta-analysis to examine the comparative effectiveness of probiotics. By searching EMBASE, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library up to 31 March 2021, randomized clinical trials (RCTs) on probiotics for treating acute diarrhea in children were included. Primary outcomes included the duration of diarrhea and diarrhea lasting ≥2 days, and secondary outcomes included the mean stool frequency on day 2 and duration of hospitalization, fever, and vomiting. We assessed the certainty of the evidence of outcomes according to Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) guideline. Eighty-four studies with twenty-one different interventions in 13,443 children were included. For the primary outcomes, moderate evidence indicated that, Lactobacillus reuteri [mean difference (MD) = −0.84 day; 95% confidence interval (CI), −1.39, −0.29], Bifidobacterium lactis (MD = −0.98 day; 95%CI, −1.82, −0.14), Saccharomyces boulardii (MD = −1.25 day; 95%CI, −1.59, −0.91), Lactobacillus species (spp.) plus Bifidobacterium spp. plus Saccharomyces spp. (MD = −1.19 day; 95%CI, −1.81, −0.58), and Bacillus spp. plus Enterococcus spp. plus Clostridium spp. (MD = −1.1 day; 95%CI, −1.84, −0.35) significantly reduced the duration of diarrhea when compared with placebo. Saccharomyces boulardii [Odds ratio (OR) = 0.22; 95%CI, 0.11, 0.41] and Lactobacillus reuteri (OR = 0.23; 95%CI, 0.090, 0.60) significantly reduced the risk of diarrhea lasting ≥2 days when compared with placebo or no treatment, with moderate evidence. Among all probiotics, Saccharomyces boulardii may be the most effective in reducing both duration of diarrhea (compared with placebo) and risk of diarrhea lasting ≥2 days (compared with placebo or no treatment), with moderate evidence. To be conclusive, Saccharomyces boulardii may be the most effective probiotic for treating acute diarrhea in children, followed by several other single-strain and multi-strain probiotics.

1 August 2023 in JAMA Network Open
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KCKangYu Chen
KangYu Chen
ZNZhiqiang Nie
Zhiqiang Nie
RSRui Shi
Rui Shi
DYDahai Yu
Dahai Yu
QWQi Wang
Qi Wang
CLChao Li
Chao Li
Importance: Emerging evidence has consistently demonstrated that sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors reduce the risk of heart failure (HF) hospitalization and cardiovascular (CV) death among patients with HF. However, it remains unclear how long a patient needs to live to potentially benefit from SGLT2 inhibitors in this population.Objectives: To estimate the time to benefit from SGLT2 inhibitors among patients with HF.Design, Setting, and Participants: This comparative effectiveness study systematically searched PubMed for completed randomized clinical trials about SGLT2 inhibitors and patients with HF published until September 5, 2022; 5 trials with the year of publication ranging from 2019 to 2022 were eventually included. Statistical analysis was performed from April to October 2022.Intervention: Addition of SGLT2 inhibitors or placebo to guideline-recommended therapy.Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the time to first event of CV death or worsening HF, which was broadly comparable across the included trials.Results: Five trials consisting of 21 947 patients with HF (7837 [35.7%] were female; mean or median age older than 65 years within each trial) were included. SGLT2 inhibitors significantly reduced the risk of worsening HF or CV death (hazard ratio [HR], 0.77 [95% CI, 0.73-0.82]). Time to first nominal statistical significance (P < .05) was 26 days (0.86 months), and statistical significance was sustained from day 118 (3.93 months) onwards. A mean of 0.19 (95% CI, 0.12-0.35) months were needed to prevent 1 worsening HF or CV death per 500 patients with SGLT2 inhibitors (absolute risk reduction [ARR], 0.002). Likewise, 0.66 (95% CI, 0.43-1.13) months was estimated to avoid 1 event per 200 patients with SGLT2 inhibitors (ARR, 0.005), 1.74 (95% CI, 1.07-2.61) months to avoid 1 event per 100 patients (ARR, 0.010), and 4.96 (95% CI, 3.18-7.26) months to avoid 1 event per 50 patients (ARR, 0.020). Further analyses indicated a shorter time to benefit for HF hospitalization and among patients with diabetes or HF with reduced ejection fraction.Conclusions and Relevance: In this comparative effectiveness research study of estimating the time to benefit from SGLT2 inhibitors among patients with HF, a rapid clinical benefit in reducing CV death or worsening HF was found, suggesting that their use may be beneficial for most individuals with HF.

30 October 2021 in Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MLMinmin Li
Minmin Li
TCTao Chen
Tao Chen
ZHZhongqiu Hua
Zhongqiu Hua
HYHong Yan
Hong Yan
DWDuolao Wang
Duolao Wang
CLChao Li
Chao Li
Background: Both pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) and diabetes mellitus (DM) are major global public health problems. We estimated the global, regional, and national prevalence of diabetes mellitus in a population with PTB. Methods: We searched for observational studies of DM in people with PTB using the PubMed and Embase electronic bibliographic databases, focusing on articles published in the English language from database inception until March 31, 2021. We included original research that reported the prevalence of DM in PTB or those that had sufficient data to compute these estimates. Studies were excluded if they did not provide primary data or were case studies or reviews. Two authors independently extracted the articles and collected detailed information using a predefined questionnaire. A country-specific random-effects meta-analysis was used for countries with two or more available studies, and a fractional response regression model was employed to predict the prevalence of DM in PTB for countries with one or no study. The study was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews, using the registration number CRD42018101989. Results: We identified 22,658 studies, and 153, across 51 countries, were retained for data extraction. The global prevalence of DM among patients with PTB was estimated to be 13.73% (95% confidence interval [CI] 12.51–14.95). The prevalence rates were 19.32% (95% CI 13.18–25.46) in the region of the Americas, 17.31% (95% CI 12.48–22.14) in the European region, 14.62% (95% CI 12.05–17.18) in Southeast Asia, 13.59% (95% CI 7.24–19.95) in the western Pacific region, 9.61% (95% CI 4.55–14.68) in the eastern Mediterranean region, and 9.30% (95% CI 2.83–15.76) in the African region. The country with the highest estimated prevalence was the Marshall Islands (50.12%; 95% CI 4.28–95.76). Conclusion: Comorbid PTB and DM remain prevalent worldwide.

28 July 2014 in Molecular Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CSChongkui Sun
Chongkui Sun
XLXiao-Bo Luo
Xiao-Bo Luo
YGYa-Ping Gou
Ya-Ping Gou
LHLing Hu
Ling Hu
KWKun Wang
Kun Wang
QCQianming Chen
Qianming Chen
WRAP53, including α, β and γ isoforms, plays an important role not only in the stability of p53 mRNA, but also in the assembly and trafficking of the telomerase holoenzyme. It has been considered an oncogene and is thought to promote the survival of cancer cells. The aim of this study was to detect the role of TCAB1 (except WRAP53α) in the occurrence and development of head and neck carcinomas. Immunohistochemistry was used to detect the TCAB1 expression in clinical specimen sections and performed western blotting to check the TCAB1 expression levels in cell lines. TCAB1 was depleted using shRNA lentivirus and the knockdown efficiency was assessed using q-PCR and Western blotting. We performed CCK-8 assays and flow cytometry to check the cell proliferation potential and used the trans-well assay to test the invasion ability in vitro. Xenografts were used to detect the tumor formation potential in vivo. Moreover, we performed cDNA microarray to investigate the candidate factors involved in this process. We observed a notable overexpression of TCAB1 in head and neck carcinoma clinical specimens as well as in carcinoma cell lines. Knockdown of TCAB1 decreased the cellular proliferation potential and invasion ability in vitro. cDNA microarray analysis suggested the possible involvement of several pathways and factors associated with tumorigenesis and carcinoma development in the TCAB1-mediated regulation of cancers. Furthermore, the xenograft assay confirmed that the depletion of TCAB1 would inhibit tumor formation in nude mice. The immunohistochemistry results of the mice tumor tissue sections revealed that the cells in shTCAB1 xenografts showed decreased proliferation potential and increased apoptotic trend, meanwhile, the angiogenesis was inhibited in the smaller tumors form shTCAB1 cells. Our study demonstrated that depletion of TCAB1 decreased cellular proliferation and invasion potential both in vitro and in vivo. The data indicated that TCAB1 might facilitate the occurrence and development of head and neck carcinomas. In future, TCAB1 might be useful as a prognostic biomarker or a potential target for the diagnosis and therapy of head and neck carcinomas.