This paper investigates the relation between media coverage and offering yield spreads using a comprehensive dataset of 5,338 industrial bonds issued from 1990 to 2011. We find that media coverage is negatively associated with firms’ cost of debt. This association is robust to controlling for standard yield determinants, different model specifications, and endogeneity. We identify 4 economic channels through which media coverage influences the cost of debt: Information asymmetry, governance, liquidity, and default risk. Importantly, media coverage has an independent influence beyond the effects of these economic mechanisms and is not a proxy for other firm attributes.

In this article, the authors propose a new method to estimate the components of corporate bond and CDS spreads. They develop a CDS pricing model with default and nondefault factors and a corporate bond pricing model with default, tax, and liquidity factors using the reduced-form approach, and they jointly estimate parameters of both models from the pooled data. By formulating default intensity as a common factor in the prices of the CDS and reference bonds, the authors are able to identify the default and nondefault components of yield spreads more precisely. They find that, on average, the liquidity premium accounts for about 20–25% of corporate yield spreads across ratings and the size of the liquidity premium increases as the rating decreases. Furthermore, they find that the CDS spread contains a nontrivial nondefault component. Ignoring this component in the CDS spread thus results in a serious bias in the estimate of spread components when using the CDS information to aid in decomposition of corporat...

This article finds that economic policy uncertainty (EPU) is a systematic risk factor priced in the cross-section of corporate bonds. Bonds with high EPU beta have low expected returns, and this negative premium is robust to controlling for conventional risk factors, bond characteristics, and macroeconomic conditions and uncertainty. The effect of policy risk is pervasive, stronger for speculative-grade bonds, and priced in both US and foreign markets. The EPU risk effect is greater for firms that have higher earnings exposure to policy uncertainty, dependence on external financing, and effective tax rates; those with lower pre-tax interest coverage; and those that operate in regulation-intensive industries.

This article investigates the role of liquidity risk in the momentum spillover from stocks to bonds by using a large data sample. The evidence strongly suggests that liquidity risk is an important determinant of momentum spillover returns. This finding is robust to controls for effects of trading liquidity, credit risk, behavioral factors, and bond characteristics. On average, liquidity risk explains about 40% of momentum spillover profits for investment-grade bonds and 55% for speculative-grade bonds over the 16-year sample period. A significant portion of momentum spillover returns can be viewed as compensation for investors’ exposure to liquidity risk when engaging in trading this anomaly.