Jose Luis González-Castro

Dr. Jose Luis González-Castro

Social Psychology Department, Educational Science, University of Burgos, 09001 Burgos, Spain
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

33Years (1994-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 June 2007 in Journal of Social Issues
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DPDarío Páez
Darío Páez
NBNekane Basabe
Nekane Basabe
SUSilvia Ubillos
Silvia Ubillos
JGJose Luis González-Castro
Jose Luis González-Castro

1 October 2011 in Personality and Individual Differences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MVMichele Vecchione
Michele Vecchione
HSHarald Schoen
Harald Schoen
JGJose Luis González-Castro
Jose Luis González-Castro
JCJan Cieciuch
Jan Cieciuch
VPVassilis Pavlopoulos
Vassilis Pavlopoulos
GCGian Vittorio Caprara
Gian Vittorio Caprara

1 January 2002 in Cognition and Emotion
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NBNekane Basabe
Nekane Basabe
DPDario Paez
Dario Paez
JVJose Valencia
Jose Valencia
JGJose Luis González-Castro
Jose Luis González-Castro
BRBernard Rimé
Bernard Rimé
EDEd Diener
Ed Diener
A research synthesis was conducted with four studies which correlated national mean self-ratings of affect balance (positive minus negative affect) and subjective well-being with the nations' cultural characteristics (individualism, masculinity, uncertainty avoidance, and power-distance national scores on Hofstede's dimensions), socioeconomic development (Human Development Index), and climate (absolute latitude). A meta-analysis of these collective level cross-cultural studies shows that individualism correlates positively with affect balance and subjective well-being, controlling for socioeconomic development, cultural femininity, power-distance, uncertainty avoidance, and climate. Similar results were found for individual-level data. The meaning of collective-level or national means of individual self-reports of affect balance is discussed.

20 October 2011 in British Journal of Psychology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MVMichele Vecchione
Michele Vecchione
GCGianvittorio Caprara
Gianvittorio Caprara
HSHarald Schoen
Harald Schoen
JGJose Luis González-Castro
Jose Luis González-Castro
SSShalom H. Schwartz
Shalom H. Schwartz

6 July 2021 in Frontiers in Psychology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JGJose Luis González-Castro
Jose Luis González-Castro
SUSilvia Ubillos-Landa
Silvia Ubillos-Landa
APAlicia Puente-Martínez
Alicia Puente-Martínez
MGMarcela Gracia-Leiva
Marcela Gracia-Leiva
The COVID-19 disease has caused thousands of deaths worldwide and required the rapid and drastic adoption of various protective measures as main resources in the fight to reduce the spread of the disease. In the present study we aimed to identify socio cognitive factors that may influence adherence to protective measures toward COVID-19 in a Spanish sample. This longitudinal study analyzes the predictive value of perceived severity and vulnerability of infection, self-efficacy, direct exposure to the virus, and instrumental focused coping style for adhering to infection protection behaviors during the first months of the COVID-19 pandemic. It also tests sex and age differences in these factors and changes over time. A two-wave longitudinal study (N = 757) was conducted in March and April 2020 starting the day after a strict national lockdown was decreed in Spain. A path analysis was used to test direct and indirect effects between vulnerability and the adherence to protective behaviors. Results suggest that individuals' perceived severity and vulnerability to COVID-19 and instrumental coping strategies are related to the use of more protective behaviors. This coping strategy mediates the effect of perceived vulnerability on engaging in protective behaviors, and this effect depends on direct exposure to COVID-19 and perceived self-efficacy moderators. Results suggest that recognizing one's own abilities to engage in instrumental actions may facilitate adherence to protective measures in people who had not been directly exposed to COVID-19. Therefore, adopting instrumental coping strategies to manage an individual's perceived vulnerability to infection may positively impact the adherence to protective behaviors, especially during the onset of an unexpected threat and when there is no prior direct experience with the situation.

MGMarcela Gracia-Leiva
Marcela Gracia-Leiva
APAlicia Puente
Alicia Puente
SUSilvia Ubillos-Landa
Silvia Ubillos-Landa
JGJose Luis González-Castro
Jose Luis González-Castro
DPDarío Páez-Rovira
Darío Páez-Rovira
Dating violence (DV) is a public health problem among young people, especially women. It involves violent acts towards one’s partner and occurs face-to-face (offline) or through the Internet (online). Offline DV is linked to suicidal ideation and attachment to parents and peers. Fewer studies analyze the psychological and social consequences of online DV. This study tests the link between young women’s DV victimization (off- and online), suicide risk (SR), and parent and peer support in a sample of young Spanish females (N = 1227) (Mage=19, SD = 2.82; range = 13–28). Results confirm that compared to non-victims off- and online DV increase suicidal thoughts and attempts. This effect is stronger for victims of both types of DV (thoughts: OR offline DV = 3.11; CI95% 2.06, 4.69; OR online DV = 2.37; CI95% 1.69, 3.32; OR off-online DV = 4.19 CI95% 2.44, 7.17) (attempts: OR offline DV = 4.02; CI95% 1.83, 8.81; OR online DV = 3.69; CI95% 1.96, 7.01; OR off-online DV = 10.55 CI95% 2.56, 44.43). Mediation and moderation models were used to assess the effect of perceived attachment of parents and friends in DV victims and SR. Mediation analyses indicated that perceived attachment and proximity to parents and peers reduces the impact of DV on SR. Moderation analyses showed that a high level of perceived peer attachment reduces the effect of offline DV on SR. Regarding off-online DV, a high level of perceived parent attachment mitigates suicide risk. Loneliness, lack of care from loved ones, and thwarted belongingness increase suicidal thoughts in DV victims. Peers and parents’ proximity may prevent risk behaviors in DV victims.