Janne Winther Christensen

Dr. Janne Winther Christensen

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

16Years (2011-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2021 in Applied Animal Behaviour Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JCJanne Winther Christensen
Janne Winther Christensen
RMRikke Munk
Rikke Munk
LHLesley Hawson
Lesley Hawson
RPRupert Palme
Rupert Palme
TLTorben Larsen
Torben Larsen
MRMaria Vilain Rørvang
Maria Vilain Rørvang

14 January 2021 in Scientific Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JCJanne Winther Christensen
Janne Winther Christensen
LALine Peerstrup Ahrendt
Line Peerstrup Ahrendt
JMJens Malmkvist
Jens Malmkvist
CNChristine Nicol
Christine Nicol
The mechanisms underlying individual variation in learning are key to understanding the development of cognitive abilities. In humans and primates, curiosity has been suggested as an important intrinsic factor that enhances learning, whereas in domesticated species research has primarily identified factors with a negative effect on cognitive abilities, such as stress and fearfulness. This study presents the first evidence of a link between object-directed curiosity and learning performance in young horses in two very different learning tasks (visual discrimination and pressure-release). We exposed young horses (n = 44) to standardised novel object tests at 5 months and 1 year of age and found consistency in responses. Standard indicators of fearfulness (e.g. heart rate and alertness) were unrelated to learning performance, whereas exploratory behaviour towards the novel objects correlated to performance in both learning tasks. Exploratory behaviour was unreinforced in the novel object tests and likely reflects the animal’s intrinsic motivation (i.e. curiosity), suggesting that this trait is favourable for learning performance. In addition to the insights that these results provide into cognition in a domesticated species, they also raise questions in relation to fostering of curiosity in animals and the impact that such manipulation may have on cognitive abilities.

1 September 2015 in Journal of Animal Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
EHE. Hartmann
E. Hartmann
KBK. E. Bøe
K. E. Bøe
JCJanne Winther Christensen
Janne Winther Christensen
SHS. Hyyppä
S. Hyyppä
HJH. Jansson
H. Jansson
LKLinda Keeling
Linda Keeling
Keeping horses in groups is widely recommended but limited information is available about how this is implemented in practice. The aim of this survey was to describe how horses are kept in the Nordic countries in relation to sex, age, breed, and equestrian discipline and to assess owners' attitudes toward keeping horses in groups. Horse owners in Denmark, Finland, Norway, and Sweden were approached using a web-based questionnaire, which was translated into 4 languages and distributed online via equestrian forums, organizations, and social media. The number of respondents was 3,229, taking care of 17,248 horses. Only 8% of horses were never kept in groups, 47% were permanently grouped for 24 h/d, and 45% were stabled singly but grouped during turnout. Yearlings were most often permanently kept in groups (75%), mares and geldings more commonly during parts of the day (50 and 51%, respectively), and stallions were often kept alone (38%). Icelandic horses were more likely to be permanently kept in groups (36%) than warmbloods (16%) and ponies (15%). Twice as many competition horses (51%) were never grouped compared with horses used for breeding (20%) or leisure purposes (15%). The majority of respondents (86%) strongly agreed that group housing benefits horse welfare and that it is important for horses to have the company of conspecifics (92%). Nevertheless, not all horses were kept in groups, showing that attitudes toward group housing may not necessarily reflect current management. The risk of injury was a concern of many respondents (45%), as was introducing unfamiliar horses into already established groups (40%) and challenges in relation to feeding in groups (44%). Safety of people (23%) and difficulties handling group-kept horses (19%) were regarded as less problematic. Results suggest that the majority of horses have the possibility to freely interact with other horses, either as fulltime members of a group during 24 h/d or during turnout. Future research should address the extent to which being a part-time member of a group affects horse welfare. For permanent group housing to become more widespread, such as it is the case for most farm animals, future research could focus on solving some of the reoccurring problems perceived with keeping horses in groups. The dissemination of evidence-based information on all aspects around keeping horses in groups can ultimately stimulate further positive changes in the management of group-kept horses.

1 January 2011 in Applied Animal Behaviour Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JCJanne Winther Christensen
Janne Winther Christensen
TZTatjana Zharkikh
Tatjana Zharkikh
ECElodie Chovaux
Elodie Chovaux

9 February 2021 in Animals
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EHElke Hartmann
Elke Hartmann
TRTherese Rehn
Therese Rehn
JCJanne Winther Christensen
Janne Winther Christensen
Per NielsenPer Nielsen
Per Nielsen
PMPaul McGreevy
Paul McGreevy
The study investigated equine responses to novelty and handling, aiming to reveal whether horse–human relationships reflect criteria of an attachment bond. Twelve adult Standardbreds were subjected to a fear-eliciting test (novel objects presented close to two humans) and a handling test (being led passing novel objects) to study attachment-related behaviours and ease of handling. The tests were performed both before (pre-test) and after (post-test) horses had been trained by the same female handler (10 sessions of 15 min). Horses were assigned to three groups of four, each of which underwent different operant conditioning protocols: negative reinforcement (NR; pressure, release of lead, and whip tap signals) or combined NR with either positive reinforcement using food (PRf) or wither scratching (PRs). Results showed that neither familiarity of the person nor training method had a significant impact on the horses’ behavioural responses in the post-tests. However, horses showed decreased heart rates between pre- and post-tests, which may indicate habituation, an effect of training per se, or that the presence of the familiar trainer served to calm the horses during the challenging situations. There were large individual variations among the horses’ responses and further studies are needed to increase our understanding of horse–human relationships.

22 September 2015 in Animal Cognition
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JCJanne Winther Christensen
Janne Winther Christensen